DOĞUM ÖNCESİ EĞİTİM NULLİPAR KADINLARDA SEZARYEN ORANLARINI AZALTIR MI?

Amaç: Son yıllarda sezaryen oranları artmış ve sağlık sistemleri bu durumu düzeltmek için çeşitli yollar denemiştir. Doğum öncesi eğitim programları bunlardan biridir. Bu çalışmanın amacı doğum öncesi eğitimin nullipar kadınlarda sezaryen oranına etkisini belirlemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif, kohort bir çalışmadır. Çalışmamıza hastanemizde doğum yapmış 200 nullipar kadın (doğum öncesi eğitim alan grup, n = 86 ve doğum öncesi eğitim almayan grup, n = 114) katılmıştır. Veriler doğum öncesi eğitim sınıfı formlarından ve hasta dosyalarından toplanmıştır. Bulgular: Doğum öncesi eğitim alan grupta sezaryen oranı % 30,2, eğitim almayan grupta ise sezaryen oranı % 36,8 olarak bulundu. Bu sonuç istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı (p < 0,05). Sonuç: Doğum öncesi eğitim alan nullipar kadınlarda sezaryen oranı azalmaktadır. Ayrıca, doğum öncesi eğitim programları standartlaştırılmalı ve katılımcıların sayısı tüm dünyada arttırılmalıdır.

Does Antenatal Education Decrease the Cesarean Rates in Nulliparous Women?

Objective: In recent years, cesarean rates have increased and healthcare systems have tried several ways tocorrect this situation. Antenatal education programs are one of them. The aim of this study was to determinethe effect of antenatal education on cesarean rates in nulliparous women.Material and Methods: This is a retrospective, cohort study. In total, 200 nulliparous women who were givenbirth at our hospital (educated group, n=86 and uneducated group, n=114) participated in the study. Datawere collected from the antenatal education class forms and patient files.Results: The rate of cesarean section in the group receiving antenatal education was found 30.2% and the rateof cesarean section in the uneducated group was 36.8%. It was statistically significant (p< 0,05).Conclusion: The rate of cesarean section decreases in nulliparous women who were taken antenataleducation. In addition, antenatal education programs must be standardized and the number of participantsshould be increased all over the world.

PDF

___

1. Toumi M, Lesieur E, Haumonte JB, Blanc J, D'ercole C, Bretelle F. Primary cesarean delivery rate: Potential impact of a checklist. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018;47 (9):419-24.
2. Çintesun E, Al RA. The effect of increased number of cesarean on maternal and fetal outcomes. Ginekol Pol. 2017;88(11):613-9.
3. OECD. Caesarean section. In: Lafortune G. editor. Health at a glance 2015: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD publishing; 2015.
4. Sukru Budak M, Temur M. A national measure to reduce primary cesarean rates in Turkey. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Oct 10:1-4.
5. Brixval CS, Axelsen SF, Lauemøller SG, Andersen SK, Due P, Koushede V. The effect of antenatal education in small classes on obstetric and psycho-social outcomes - a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2015;4:20.
6. Di Giovanni P, Garzarella T, Di Martino G, Schioppa FS, Romano F, Staniscia T. Trend in primary caesarean delivery: a five-year experience in ABRUZZO, ITALY. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):514.
7. World Health Organization Human Reproduction Programme. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Reprod Health Matters. 2015; 23(45):149–50.
8. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016;11(2): e0148343.
9. Ferguson S, Davis D, Browne J. Does antenatal education affect labour and birth? A structured review of the literature. Women Birth. 2013;26(1):e5-8.
10. Kızılırmak A, Başer M. The effect of education given to primigravida women on fear of childbirth. Appl Nurs Res. 2016;29:19-24.
11. Serçekuş P, Başkale H. Effects of antenatal education on fear of childbirth, maternal self-efficacy and parental attachment. Midwifery. 2016;34:166-72.
12. Mehdizadeh A, Roosta F, Chaichian S, Alaghehbandan R. Evaluation of the impact of birth preparation courses on the health of the mother and the newborn. Am J Perinatol. 2005;22(1):7-9.
13. Cantone D, Pelullo CP, Cancellieri M, Attena F. Can antenatal classes reduce the rate of cesarean section in southern Italy? Women Birth. 2017;30(2):e83-e88.
14. Phipps H, Charlton S, Dietz HP. Can antenatal education influence how women push in labour? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49(3):274-8.
15. Escott D, Slade P, Spiby H. Preparation for pain management during childbirth: the psychological aspects of coping strategydevelopment in antenatal education. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29(7):617-22.
16. Fabian HM, Rådestad IJ, Waldenström U. Childbirth and parenthood education classes in Sweden. Women's opinion and possibleoutcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005; 84(5):436-43.
17. Paz-Pascual C, Pinedo IA, Grandes G, de Gamboa GR, Hermosilla IO, de la Hera AB, et al. Design and process of the EMA Cohort Study: the value of antenatal education in childbirth and breastfeeding. BMC Nurs. 2008;7:5.
18. Artieta-Pinedo I, Paz-Pascual C, Grandes G, Remiro-Fernandezdegamboa G, Odriozola-Hermosilla I, Bacigalupe A, et al. The benefits of antenatal education for the childbirth process in Spain. Nurs Res. 2010;59(3):194-202.