___

• Albert, J., Zientek, L. R., & Manage, A. (2018). Attendance: A case-study in developmental mathematics classrooms. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 48(3), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2018.1472941
• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Author.
• Bahr, P. R. (2008). Does mathematics remediation work?: A comparative analysis of academic attainment among community college students. Research in Higher Education, 49(5), 420–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9089-4
• Bangert, A. W. (2004). The seven principles of good practice: A framework for evaluating online teaching. The International Higher Education, 7(3), 217-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.06.003
• Cafarella, B. V. (2014) Exploring best practices in developmental math. Research & Teaching in Developmental Education, 30(2), 35–64.
• Chickering, A., & Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 30(7), 3–7.
• Chickering A. W., Gamson, Z. F., & Barsi, L. M. (1991). Seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education faculty inventory. In A. W. Chickering & Z. F. Gamson (Eds.), Applying the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education (pp. 71–85). Josey-Bass.
• Clarke, S., Arnab, S. Morini, L., & Heywood, L. (2018). Remixing dungeons and dragons: A playful approach to student self-reflection. Proceedings of the European Conference on Games Based Learning (pp. 872–875).
• Cousins, C. L. (2012). A case study of community college students’ perceptions of linked courses instructors’ use of Chickering and Gamson’s (1987). (UMI No. 3508225). (Ed.D. Dissertation, University of Hartford). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database.
• Cumming, G. (2011). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analyses. Routledge.
• Cumming, G., & Finch, S. (2001). A primer on the understanding, use, and calculation of confidence intervals that are based on central and noncentral distributions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(4), 532-574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164401614002
• Dewey, J. (1997). How we think. Dover Publications, INC. Mineola, New York.
• Dinman, S. M. (1996). What college teachers need to know. In R. J. Menges & M. Weimer (Eds.), Teaching on solid ground (pp. 297–314). Jossey-Bass.
• Fong, C. J., & Zientek, L. R. (2019). Instructional practices in developmental mathematics: A multilevel analysis of community college student perceptions. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 49(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2018.1514283
• Ganga, E., Mazzariello, A., & Edgecombe, N. (2018). Developmental education: An introduction for policymakers. Center for the Analysis of Postsecondary Readiness.
• https://www.ecs.org/developmental-education-an-introduction-for-policymakers/
• Garofalo, J., & Trinter, C. (2013). Using simulations to foster preservice mathematics teachers’ self-assessment, learning, and reflections on teaching. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 1(2), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.1.2.0162
• Hendrix, J. C. (1996). Cooperative learning: Building a democratic community. Clearing House, 69(6), 333-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.1996.10114333
• Hopkins, Z. H., Moreno, C., & Secrest, A. M. (2019). Lack of confidence interval reporting in dermatology: A call to action. British Journal of Dermatology. 180(4), 910-915. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17126
• Howard, L., & Whitaker, M. (2011). Unsuccessful and successful mathematics learning: Developmental students’ perceptions. Journal of Developmental Education, 35(2), 1–16.
• Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
• Majzub, R. M. (2013). Teacher trainees’ self-evaluation during teaching practicum. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102(22), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.733
• National Association of Developmental Education (n.d.). NADE-Mission, vision, and goals.
• Nasser, F., & Fresko, B. (2002). Faculty views of student evaluation of college teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(2), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930220128751
• Negron-Morales, P.,Vazquez-Rodriquez, I., & Leon-Lozada, A. D. (1996). Good practices in undergraduate education from the students’ and faculty’s view: Consensus or disagreement (ED397729). ERIC.
• Oberst, J. E. (1995). Seven principles student inventory: An indicator of success? (UMI No. 9544938). (Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database.
• Olina, Z., & Sullivan, H. J. (2004) Student self-evaluation, teacher evaluation, and learner performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504672
• Porter, J. (2017). Why you should make time for self-reflection (Even if you hate doing it). Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2017/03/why-you-should-make-time-for-self-reflection-even-if-you-hate doing-it
• Rolheiser, C., & Ross, J. A. (2001). Student self-evaluation: What research says and what practice shows. In R. D. Small, & A. Thomas (Eds.), Plain talk about kids (pp. 43-57). Center for Development and Learning.
• Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. A. (2007). Teacher self-assessment: A mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(2), 146–-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.035
• Smith, E. G. (2014). Faculty integration of technology in undergraduate courses at private colleges and universities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2444
• Smittle, P. (2003). Principles for effective teaching in developmental education. Journal of Developmental Education 26(3), 10–12, 14, 16.
• Spinney, K. (2017). The importance of self-evaluation and self-reflection throughout the year (not just at performance review time). Retrieved from https://katherinespinney.com/importance-selfreflection selfevaluation-throughout-year-not-just-performance-review-time/
• Stallings, V., & Tascoine, C. (1996). Student self-assessment and self-evaluation. The Mathematics Teacher, 89(7), 548–554.
• Thompson, B. (2003). Score reliability: Contemporary thinking on reliability issues. Sage.
• Tinto, V. (2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. The University of Chicago Press.
• Tursini, U. (2017). Exploring changes in teachers’ instructional practice through self-evaluation as a meditational activity: A case study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(3), 556–564. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0803.14
• Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Inviting confidence in school: Invitations as a critical source of the academic self-efficacy beliefs of entering middle school students. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 12, 7–16.
• Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54(8), 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594
• Zientek, L. R., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2008). Reporting practices in quantitative teacher education research: One look at the evidence cited in the AERA panel report. Educational Researcher, 37(4), 208-216. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08319762
• Zientek, L. R., Ozel, Z. E. Y., Fong, C. J., & Griffin, M. (2013). Student success in developmental mathematics courses. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 37(12), 990–1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2010.491993
• Zientek, L. R., Yetkiner Ozel, Z. E., Ozel, S., & Allen, J. (2012). Reporting confidence intervals and effect sizes: Collecting the evidence. Career and Technical Education Research, 37(3), 277-295.
• Zientek, L. R., Yetkiner, Z. E., & Thompson, B. (2010). Characterizing the mathematics anxiety literature using confidence intervals as a literature review mechanism. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(6), 424-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383093
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2