The effect of nitrogen (urea) and zinc applied in different doses from the soil and leaves on the development, dry matter amount and mineral content of wheat and corn plants

The effect of nitrogen (urea) and zinc applied in different doses from the soil and leaves on the development, dry matter amount and mineral content of wheat and corn plants

This study was carried out to determine the effects of nitrogen and zinc applied in different doses (0.0, 5.0, 10.0 and 15.0 kg N/da and 0.0 and 2.5 ppm Zn) to the soil sample taken from Erzurum Atatürk University Faculty of Agriculture Farm land on the dry matter content and mineral content of wheat and maize. It was carried out under greenhouse conditions in 96 pots (2 plants, 2 application methods, 4 nitrogen doses, 2 zinc doses and 3 replications). As a base fertilizer, it was applied to all pots before planting at doses of 10.0 kg P2O5/da (TSP: 44.0% P2O5) and 10.0 kg K2O/da (K2SO4: 50.0% K2O). Considering the applications, Urea and Zinc fertilizers were applied to the soil before planting in soil application, and from foliar application 5 times in every 2 weeks, starting one week after germination in foliar application. 90 days after sowing, the plants were harvested, dried, their dry weights were determined, the necessary analyzes were made and the plant mineral content was determined. According to the results obtained, nitrogen application from the soil was more effective, and the highest dry matter amount and plant height in both plants were obtained from the soil application of 15.0 kgN/da urea and 2.5 ppm Zn. Depending on the applications, the dry matter increase is 77.5% in wheat and 80.4% in corn in application from soil. In foliar application, the dry matter increase is 11.4% in wheat and 30.6% in corn. A similar change has also emerged in plant height, the plants applied fertilizer from the soil are taller, with an average of 62.5 cm in wheat and 75.5 cm in maize. These values are on average 55.0 cm and 64.0 cm in plants applied foliar fertilizer. The mineral content of the plants applied foliar fertilizer is higher.

___

  • Akman, H. ve Topal, A., 2010. Makarnalık Buğdayda Farklı şekillerde Üre Uygulamasının Verim, Verim Unsurları ve Kaliteye Etkisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 24 (3), p: 41-51
  • Anonim, 2015. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu Verileri.
  • Aydın, A., ve Sezen, Y., 1995. Toprak Kimyası Laboratuvar Kitabı. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Yayınları No: 174.
  • Ayyıldız, T., 1982. Dünya’da Beslenme Sorunu ve Buğday Pazarlarının Durumu. Tarım ve Mühendislik Dergisi, Sayı:9, Ankara.
  • Aşalma, D. 1999. Azotlu Gübrelerin Kolzanın Verim ve Verim Öğelerine Etkisi. Ankara Üni. Ziraat Fakültesi Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 8, (1-2).
  • Bayraklı, F., 1987. Toprak ve Bitki Analizleri. 19 Mayıs Üni. Yayın No:17. Samsun (Çeviri), Yazanlar: Ir. J. Ch. Van Schonwerburg, Dr. Ir. V. J.G. Houba, Dr. Ir. I. Novozanisky ve I. Walinga
  • Demiralay, İ., 2013. Toprak Fiziksel Analizleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Yayınları No:143
  • Gree, G. W., ve Hortage, K. H., 1986. Particle-Size Analysis. Methods of soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Minerological Methods Second Edition. Agronomy No. 9. P:383-441
  • Güçdemir, İ. H., Türker, U., Karabulut, A., Usul, M., Bozkurt, M., Arcak, Ç., 2008. Çukurova’da Mısır Tarımında Hassas Tarım Tekniklerini Kullanarak Değişken Oranlı Gübre Uygulamaları. 4. Ulusal Bitki Besleme ve Gübreleme Kongresi Konya 2008, 116- 125.
  • Güzel, N., Gülüt, Y. K., ve Büyük, G., 2002. Toprak Verimliliği ve Gübreler Ders Kitabı. Ç. Ü. Ziraat Fak. Genel Yayın No: 246, Ders Kitapları Yayın No: A-80 Adana.
  • Kacar, B., 1972. Bitki ve Toprağın Kimyasal Analizleri II. Bitki Analizleri. Ankara Üniv. Yayın No: 453, Ziraat Fakültesi Uygulama Klavuzu 155.
  • Karaca, S., Çimrin, K.M., (2002). Adi fiğ (Visia sativa L.) + Arpa (Hordeum vulgare L) Karışımında Azot ve Fosforlu Gübrelemenin Verim ve Kaliteye Etkileri. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 12, 47-52 IBM, SPSS Statistics 19.0, 2010
  • Lindsay, W. L. ve W. A. Norvell, 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil. Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. Vol.:42, p:421-428.
  • McLean, E. O., 1982. Soil pH and Lime Requirement. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties Second Edition. Agronamy. No: 9 Part 2. Edition P: 199- 224.
  • Nazar, H. (2012). Ekmeklik buğdayda (Triticum aestivum L.) farklı besin maddesi içerikteki yaprak gübrelerinin verim, verim öğeleri ve bazı kalite özelliklerine etkisinin belirlenmesi (Master's thesis, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü).
  • Nelson, D. W., ve Sommers, L. E., 1982. Organic Matter. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties Second Edition. Agronamy. No: 9 Part 2. Edition P: 574- 579.
  • Nelson, R. E., 1982. Carbonate and Gypsum. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties Second Edition. Agronamy. No: 9 Part 2. Edition P: 191- 197.
  • Olsen, S. R., ve Sommers, L. E., 1982. Phosphorus. Meyhods of Soil Analysis Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties Second Edition. Agronamy. No: 9 Part 2.Edition P: 403- 427.
  • Rhoades, J. D., 1982a. Cation Exchange Capacity. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties Second Edition. Agronamy. No: 9 Part 2. Edition P: 149- 157.
  • Rhoades, J. D., 1982b. Exchangeable Cations. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties Second Edition. Agronamy. No:9 Part 2. Edition P: 159- 164.
  • Rhoades, J. D., 1996. Salinity: Electrical Conductivity and Dissolved Soilds. In: Methods of Soil Analysis Part III. Chemical Methods 2 Edition. Agronamy. No: 15, Madison, Visconsin. USA, P: 417- 436.
  • Söğüt, T., (2005). Aşılama ve Azotlu Gübre Uygulamasının Bazı Soya Çeşitlerinin Verim ve Verim Özelliklerine Etkisi. Akdeniz Üniv. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(2), 213-218