Investigation of Vegetable Production Amount and the Size of Cultivation Areas in Kahramanmaraş with the Econometric Model

Investigation of Vegetable Production Amount and the Size of Cultivation Areas in Kahramanmaraş with the Econometric Model

In this study, it is to determine the relationship between the size of the agricultural land planted between 2016-2020 and its average yield in Afşin, Andırın, Dulkadiroğlu, Ekinözü, Elbistan, Göksun, Nurhak, Onikisubat, Pazarcık, Türkoğlu and Çağlayancerit districts of Kahramanmaraş province. For this, according to the data obtained from TUIK, 5 products selected in grain, which are thought to be produced more widely in the region, are respectively; Wheat, corn, barley, chickpea and sugar beet, while the others are probably 5 products selected in fruit, respectively; Apple, cherries, strawberries, mulberries and walnuts and others, which are considered to be produced more than 5 vegetables selected, respectively; pepper, cucumber, acur, tomato and garlic. For the estimation results obtained in the research, VAR (vector autoregressive model) analysis, which is an econometric program, and unit root test were used. According to the estimation results, it was determined that there is a 0.99 correlation between the size of the agricultural land planted and the amount of yield in selected products according to the years in Kahramanmaraş districts between the years 2016-2020, and as a result of the VAR analysis, the most appropriate delay size was the 10th delay. In addition, the average productivity of 1 decare of total cultivated land in the districts according to the selected years is 0.6909 in Afşin, 0.4397 in Andırın, 0.6732 in Dulkadiroğlu, 0.4057 in Ekinözü, 0.6371 in Elbistan, 0.5208 in Göksun, 0.3068 in Nurhak, Onikişubat. 0.5542 tons in Pazarcık, 0.5891 tons in Türkoğlu, 0.6827 tons in Çağlayancerit and 0.6046 tons in Çağlayancerit.

___

  • Awasthi MK. 2014. Socioeconomic determinants of farmland value in India, Land Use Policy, 39:78–83.
  • Akıncı İ, Topakcı M, Çanakçı M. 1997. Agricultural Structure and Mechanization Characteristics of Antalya Region Agricultural Enterprises, 17th National Congress of Agricultural Mechanization, 17-19 September 1997, Proceedings Book, p. 45-57, Tokat.
  • Bayramoğlu Z. 2014. The Effects of Risk Behaviors of Cherry Growers on Business Income, the case of Akşehir District, Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, Agricultural Economy Research Institute, Ankara.
  • Comart A. 2016. Determination of Agricultural Structure, Production and Mechanization Characteristics of Agricultural Enterprises in Antalya Province, Master Thesis, Akdeniz University, Institute of Science, Antalya.
  • Cakir C, Miran B, Isin S. 1991. The Relationship Between Productivity and Business Size of Agricultural Enterprises Producing Herbal Production in the Aegean Region, I. Productivity Congress, MPM Publications No: 454.
  • Fuller WA. 1996. Introduction to Statistical Time Series 2nd edition, John Wiley and Sons Inc.
  • Gacener A. 2005. Analysis of the Validity of Wagner's Law for Turkey, Dokuz Eylul University, Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 20(1):103-122.
  • Johansen S. 1995. Likelihood Based Inference in Cointegrated vector Autoregressive Models Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Karakayacı Z. 2005. Investigation of the Difference Between Income Method and Market Value Method Applied in Appraisal of Agricultural Lands in Konya Province Ereğli District, Master Thesis, Selcuk University, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Agricultural Economics, Konya.
  • Keles I. 2015. Determination of Agricultural Structure and Mechanization Characteristics of Çumra District Agricultural Enterprises, Master Thesis, Selcuk University, Institute of Science and Technology, Konya.
  • Özden A, Armağan G. 2005. Determination of the Efficiency of Crop Production Activities in Aydın Province Agricultural Enterprises, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 11(2):111-121.
  • Özkan G, Kadağan Ö. 2019. An Evaluation of the Development of Bursa Province Agricultural Potential, Turkish Studies, 14(2):503-522.
  • Öztürk D, İslam A, Turan A, Köse MA. 2021. Investigation of Agricultural Enterprises and Production Activities in Bulancak District, Black Sea Journal of Social Sciences, 13(24): 148-163.
  • Tarı R. 2012. Econometrics, Umut Tepe Bookstore, 8th Edition, Kocaeli.
  • Topçu P. 2012. Policies for the Protection and Effective Use of Agricultural Lands, Planning Specialization Thesis, General Directorate of Economic Sectors and Coordination, T.R. Ministry of Development, Publication No: 2836, ISBN 978-975-19-5771-4.
  • Yılmaz H, Demircan V, Association Z. 2006. Agricultural Structure, Production and Development Potential of Isparta Province, Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Agriculture, 1(2):1-16.
  • Yomralıoğlu T, Çete M. 2005. The Need for a Sustainable Land Policy for Turkey, TMMOB Chamber of Surveying and Cadastre Engineers, 10. Turkey Scientific and Technical Mapping Congress, 28 March-1 April 2005, Ankara.