Murat KURŞAT, Birol BAŞER, Serap AKDENİZ

Asperula ve Galium’un (Rubiaceae) Bazı Taksonlarının Palinomorfolojik Çalışmaları

Bu araştırmada Rubiaceae familyasından Asperula L., Galium L. cinslerine ait; Asperula xylorrhiza Nábelek (siirt belumotu), Asperula orientalis Boiss. & Hohen. (gökçe belumotu), Asperula arvensis L. (tarla belumotu), Galium humifusum M.Bieb. (çimen iplikçiği),Galium consanguineum Boiss. (altın iplikçik), Galium incanum L. subsp. elatius (Boiss.) Ehrend.(gür iplikçik), Galium consanguineum Boiss. (altın iplikçik), Galium mite Boiss. & Hohen. (süpürge iplikçiği), Galium spurium L. subsp. spurium (arsız iplikçik) taksonları palinolojik özellikleri açısından incelenmiştir. Bu taksonlara ait örnekler yapılan arazi çalışmalarında toplanmıştır. Bu familyaya ait 9 takson ışık mikroskobu (LM) ve taramalı elektron mikroskobu (SEM) kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Bu çalışma sonucunda zonokolpat, perforat ve skabrat, olması gibi bazı ortak özellikler bulunmuştur.

Palynomorphological Studies on some Asperula and Galium (Rubiaceae) Taxa

In this research, the genera Asperula L., Galium L.; Asperula xylorrhiza Nábelek (siirt belumotu), Asperulaorientalis Boiss. & amp; Hohen. (gökçe belumotu), Asperula arvensis L. (tarla belumotu), Galium humifusum M.Bieb. (çimen iplikçiği), Galium consanguineum Boiss. (altın iplikçik), Galium incanum L. subsp. elatius (Boiss.)Ehrend. (gür iplikçik), Galium consanguineum Boiss. (altın iplikçik), Galium mite Boiss. & amp; Hohen. (süpürgeiplikçiği), Galium spurium L. subsp. spurium (arsız iplikçik) of the family Rubiaceae, have been studied in termsof palynological properties. Examples of these taxa were collected in the field studies. 9 taxa light microscopy(IM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) belonging to this family were studied. As a result of this studysome common traits of the taxa found out such as zonocolpate, perforate and scabrate.

PDF

___

[1] Ruhsam M., Govaerts R.H.A., Davis A.P. 2008. Nomenclatural changes in preparation for a World Rubiaceae checklist. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 157 (1): 115-124.
[2] Seçmen Ö., Gemci Y., Leblebici E., Görk G., Bekat L. 1995. Tohumlu Bitkiler Sistematiği. Ege Üniv. Fen Fak. Kitaplar Serisi, No: 116, İzmir.
[3] Davis P.H. 1982. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Volume 7. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 722-767.
[4] Davis P.H., Mill R.R., Tan K. 1988. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Volume 10, suppl. 1, Edinburgh Univ. Press. Edinburgh.
[5] Özhatay N. 2000. Flora of Turkey and the east Aegean Islands. Volume 11, suppl. 2, Edinburgh Univ. Press. Edinburgh.
[6] Güner A., Aslan S., Ekim T., Vural M., Babaç M.T. 2012. Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler). Flora Araştırmaları Derneği ve Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi Yayını, İstanbul.
[7] Erdtman G. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy angiosperms. Chronica Botanica Co., Waltham, Massachusettes.
[8] Erdtman G. 1971. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy: Angiosperms. Hafner, New York.
[9] Bremekamp C.E.B. 1952. The African species of Oldenlandia L. sensu Hiern et K. Schuman. Verh. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch., Afd. Natuurk., Tweed Sect., 48: 1-297.
[10] Lobreau-Callen D. 1978. L’aperture composê des Rubiaceae. Extr. Ann. Mines Belg., 2: 167-173.
[11] Van Campo M. 1978. La face interne de l’exine. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 26: 301-311.
[12] Muller J. 1981. Fossil Pollen records of Extant angiosperms. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster), 47: 1-142.
[13] Huysmans S., Dessein S., Smets E., Robbrecht E., 2003. Pollen morphology of NW European representatives confirms monophyly of Rubieae (Rubiaceae). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 127: 219-240.
[14] Dessein S., Huysmans S., Robbrecht E., Smets E. 2002. Pollen of African Spermacoce Species (Rubiaceae) morphology and evolutionary aspects. Grana, 41: 69-89.
[15] Dessein S., Ochoterena H., De Block H., Lens F., Robbrecht E., Schols P., Smets E., Vinckier S., Huysmans S. 2005. Palynological characters and their phylogenatic signal in Rubiaceae. Bot. Rev., 71 (3): 354-414.
[16] Verellen J., Dessein S., Razafimandimbison S.G., Smets E., Huysmans S. 2007. Pollen morphologyof the tribes Naucleeae and Hymenodictyeae (Rubiaceae–Cinchonoideae) and its phylogenetic significance. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 153: 329-341.
[17] Perveen A., Qaiser M. 2007. Pollen flora of Pakistan-Liv Rubiaceae. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39: 999–1015.
[18] Abdel Khalik K., Abd El-Ghani M.M., Elkordy A. 2007. A palynological study of Galium L. (Rubiaceae) in Egypt and its systematic implication. Article in Feddes Repertorium·December, 317: 311-326.
[19] Wodehouse R.P. 1935. Pollen Grains. M.C. Graw, Hill N.Y.
[20] Hesse M., Halbritter H., Zetter R., Weber M., Buchner R., Frosch-Radivo A., Ulrich S. 2009. Pollen Terminology, An illustrated handbook. pp. 15-23. Springer-Verlag/Wien, Austria.
[21] Punt W., Blackmore S., Nilsson S., Le Thomas A. 1994. Glossary of Pollen and Spore Terminology. LPP Foundation, Utrecht, 1-246.
[22] Punt W., Hoen P.P., Blackmore S., Nilsson S., Le Thomas A. 2007. Glossary of Pollen and SporeTerminology. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 143: 1-81.
[23] Utzschneider R. 1947. Der Fruchtknotenbau der Rubiaceeen mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Cinchonoideen. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Munich.
[24] Robbrecht E. 1982. Pollen morphology of the tribes Anthospermeae and Paederieae (Rubiaceae) in relation to taxonomy. Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Bel., 52: 349-366.
[25] Qauser M., Perveen A. 1997. A Palynological survey of flora of Pakistan, In M. Ozturk, O. Secmen and G. Gork (Eds.), Proceedings of Int. Symp. On Plant life of South West Asia and Central Asia.
[26] Minareci E., Yıldız K., Çırpıcı A. 2010. Comparative morphological and palynological study on poorly known Asperula serotina and its closest relative A. purpurea subsp. apiculata. Scientific Research and Essays, 5: 2472-2479.
[27] Minareci E., Yıldız K. 2010. Asperula pseudochlorantha var. antalyensis comb. et stat. nov. (Rubiaceae). Ann. Bot. Fennici, 47: 121-128.