Kripke’de Özel Adlar, Fiziksel Durumlar ve Zihinsel Durumlar İçin İleri Sürülen Özdeşlik Tezi Tartışması

Discussion of the Propounded Identicalness Thesis for Proper Nouns, Physi- cal Situations and Mental Situations in Kripke

In this study, Kripke's claim, that within the framework of the possible worlds argument, the identification of mental processes by being reduced to physical events doesn't have an imperative base is addressed. Theories of physicalism and identity aims to explain the mental processes in a thoroughly physical way, thus trying to reduce it to the physical one, through brain events. According to Kripke, there must be an imperativeness for the identification of mental states with physical states. According to him, however, it is not possible to show that physical events necessarily reveal mental processes. According to Kripke, in order to be imperatively correct for one statement, it must be correct in all possible worlds. Kripke uses the concept of "rigid designator" to describe this situation. According to Kripke, the thesis of identity between rigid designators must be metaphysically imperative correct. This situation does not apply to mental events. So then, the aim of this article is to reveal why the thesis of identity proposed in the explanation of physical and mental situations in terms of Kripke is not valid

PDF

___

Baykent, U. Ö. (2017). Dil Felsefesinde Anlam Sorunu. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 56 (3), 497-508.
Churchland, P. M. (2012). Madde ve Bilinç: Zihin Felsefesine Güncel Bir Bakış (çev. B. Ersöz). İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
Güçlü, A. vd. (2008). Felsefe Sözlüğü. Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları.
Günday, Ş. (2003). Zihin Felsefesi. Bursa: Asa Kitabevi.
İnan, İ. (2012). Dil Felsefesi. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Fakültesi Yayınları.
Kripke, S. (2005). Adlandırma ve Zorunluluk (çev. B. Açıl). İstanbul: Litera Yayıncılık.
Levine, J. (1983). Materialism and Qualia: the Explanatory Gap. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64, 354-361.
Priest, S. (1991). Theories of the Mind. London: Penguin Books.
Putnam, H. (1973). Meaning and Reference. The Journal of Philosophy, 70 (19), Seventieth Annual Meeting of the American Philosophical Association Eastern Division. Nov. 8, pp. 699-711.
Revonsuo, A. (2016). Bilinç: Öznelliğin Bilimi (çev. S. Değirmenci). İstanbul: Küre Yayınları. Rossi, J. G. (2001). Analitik Felsefe (çev. A. Altınörs). İstanbul: Paradigma Yayınları.
Searle, J. R. (2004). Zihnin Yeniden Keşfi (çev. M. Macit). İstanbul: Litera Yayınları.
Shaffer, J. A. (2005). Zihin Felsefesi (çev. T. Koç). İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık.
Soames, S. (2003). Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, vol. 2. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeston University Press.
Speaks, J. (2007). A Guide to Kripke’s Attack on Descriptivism in Lectures I & II of Naming & Necessity. January 24.
Tura, S. M. (2010). Madde ve Mana: Rasyonalitenin Kökeni. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.