Kalipso, Tanrıçalar Arasında Bir İlahi Varlık: Homeros'tan Star Trek'e Alegorizasyonu, Sembolizasyonu ve Alımlanışı

ÖZET Homeros'un Odysseia'sına göre Odysseus'un Truva Savaşı'ndan eve dönmesi on yıl sürmüş, ancak bunun yedi gününü güzel bir adada, kendisi kadar güzel bir tanrıçanın refakatinde geçirmiştir. Kalypso -tanrıçalar arasında bir ilahi varlık (Homeros tarafından defalarca dile getirildiği gibi)-, yalnızca Odysseus'u büyülemekle kalmamış, aynı zamanda milyonlarca okuyucunun ilgisini çekerek akademisyenlere, yazarlara ve sanatçılara ilham vermiştir. Bu makale, alımlama ve yeniden yorumlama çalışmalarıyla geçen 2700 yıllık akademik maratondan hareketle Kalipso'nun Odysseus’a misafirperverliğini ve -başarısız olsa da- ölümsüzlüğü sunuşundan bu yana geçirdiği dönüşümlerin izini sürmektedir. Makalede Tanrıça Kalypso'nun (geniş anlamda tanımlanmış) kültürel önemi, Odysseia'da ilk ortaya çıkışıyla başlayıp yirminci yüzyıldan alımlama örneklerinin bir seçkisiyle sona ererek tartışılmaktadır. İlk olarak, Kalypso'nun Odysseia'deki rolü ve işlevi, adının ve ona atanan lakapların analiziyle birlikte tartışılmıştır. Daha sonra, Kalypso'nun alımlanmasının üç ana yönü ele alınmaktadır: bilimdeki alegorik ve sembolik yorumlar, görsel tasvirler ve popüler alımlama. Alegorik ve sembolik okumaların tüm bu alanlarda önemli bir rol oynadığı ve birçoğunun Odysseia'dan kaynaklanan hermenötik meydan okumalar ve metinsel boşluklardan kaynaklandığı gösterilmiştir.

Kalypso, the Divine Among the Goddesses: Allegorisation, Symbolisation and Reception from Homer to Star Trek

According to Homer’s Odyssey, Odysseus takes ten years to return home from the Trojan War, yet seven of these he spends on a beautiful island in the company of an equally beautiful goddess. Not only did Kalypso, “the divine among the goddesses” (as she is repeatedly called by Homer), enchant Odysseus, she has also intrigued millions of readers and inspired scholars, writers and artists. In a tour de force through 2700 years of scholarship, reception and reworkings, this article traces, by way of example, the different paths that Kalypso has taken ever since she offered Odysseus hospitality and – albeit unsuccessfully – immortality. The cultural significance (broadly defined) of the goddess Kalypso is discussed, beginning with her first appearance in the Odyssey and ending with a selection of examples of reception from the twentieth century. First, Kalypso’s role and function in the Odyssey is discussed, along with an analysis of her name and the epithets assigned to her. Thereafter, three major aspects of Kalypso’s reception are considered: allegorical and symbolic interpretations in scholarship, visual depictions, and popular reception. It is demonstrated that allegorical and symbolic readings play an important role in all these areas and that many of them are rooted in hermeneutic challenges and textual gaps that stem from the Odyssey.

___

  • Ackerman, R. (1990). The Myth and Ritual School: J.G. Frazer and the Cambridge Ritualists. Garland Press.
  • Alden, M.J. (1985). The Rôle of Calypso in the Odyssey. Antike & Abendland, 31, 97–107.
  • Anderson, W.S. (1958). Calypso and Elysium. The Classical Journal, 54, 2–11.
  • Bär, S. (2020). The Nature and Characteristics of the Gods in Classical Mythology. Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium, 30, 7–46.
  • Bär, S. (2021). The Second Divine Council at Odyssey 5.1–42 Reconsidered. Akrote-rion, 66, 1–16.
  • Bärtschi, A. (2022). Ungeheuer oder Mobbing-Opfer? Die ambivalente Charakteri¬sierung des antiken Kyklopen in modernen Bildmedien. In K. Dolle & S.A. Dreiling (Eds.), Space Oddities: Die homerische Irrfahrt in Bildkünsten und Populärkultur 1800–2021 (Europa–USA–Südamerika). ART-Books. 359–381.
  • Beck, D. (2005). Odysseus: Narrator, Storyteller, Poet? Classical Philology, 100, 213–227.
  • Canevaro, L.G. (2018). Women of Substance in Homeric Epic: Objects, Gender, Agency. Oxford University Press.
  • Caprino, C. (1959). Calipso. Enciclopedia dell’arte antica classica e orientale, 2, 276–277.
  • Clayton, B. (2004). A Penelopean Poetics: Reweaving the Feminine in Homer’s Odyssey. Lexington Books.
  • Crane, G. (1988). Calypso: Backgrounds and Conventions of the Odyssey. Athenäum.
  • Csapo, E. (2005). Theories of Mythology. Blackwell.
  • Dirlmeier, F. (1967). Die “schreckliche” Kalypso. In H. Meller & H.-J. Zimmermann (Eds.), Lebende Antike: Symposium für Rudolf Sühnel. Erich Schmidt. 20–26.
  • Felson, N. (1994). Regarding Penelope: From Character to Poetics. Prince University Press.
  • Focke, F. (1943). Die Odyssee. Kohlhammer.
  • Frazer, J.G. (1994). The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. New abridge-ment from the 2nd and 3rd ed. Oxford University Press.
  • Garvie, A.F. (1994). Homer: Odyssey Books VI–VIII. Cambridge University Press.
  • Graf, F. (1993). Greek Mythology: An Introduction (T. Marier, Trans.). The Johns Hop¬kins University Press (German original: Griechische Mythologie: Eine Einfüh¬rung, 1987).
  • Green, P. (1998). Homer for the Kiddies. Arion, 5(3), 145–154.
  • Güntert, H. (1919). Kalypso: Bedeutungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiet der indogermanischen Sprachen. Max Niemeyer.
  • Hainsworth, J.B. (1988). Commentary Odyssey Books V–VIII. In A. Heubeck, S. West & J.B. Hainsworth (Eds.), A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey: Volume I: Introduction and Books I–VIII. Oxford University Press. 249–288.
  • Hall, E. (2008). The Return of Ulysses: A Cultural History of Homer’s Odyssey. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Hansen, W. (2004). Handbook of Classical Mythology. ABC-CLIO.
  • Harder, R. (1960). Odysseus und Kalypso. In W. Marg (Ed.), Richard Harder: Kleine Schriften. C.H. Beck. 148–163 (originally from 1957, unprinted).
  • Heubeck, A. (1965). KE-RA-SO. Untersuchungen zu einem mykenischen Personen¬namen. Kadmos, 4, 138–145.
  • Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Frag-ments (E. Jephcott, Trans.). Stanford University Press (German original: Dia-lektik der Aufklärung: Philosophische Fragmente, 1987).
  • Hunger, H. (1954). Allegorische Mythendeutung in der Antike und bei Johannes Tzetzes. Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinischen Gesellschaft, 3, 35–54.
  • Iser, W. (1976). Der Akt des Lesens: Theorie ästhetischer Wirkung. UTB.
  • Jones, P.V. (1988). Homer’s Odyssey: A Commentary based on the English Translation of Richmond Lattimore. Bristol Classical Press.
  • de Jong, I.J.F. (1992). The Subjective Style in Odysseus’ Wanderings. The Classical Quarterly, 42, 1–11.
  • de Jong, I.J.F. (2001). A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kahl, J. (2008). Grenzen der Liebe. Zwischen Begehren und Verweigern: Eine Bildmeditation zu Max Beckmanns “Odysseus und Kalypso” (1943). http://www.kahl-marburg.privat.t-online.de/beckmann.pdf.
  • Kaiser, E. (1964). Odyssee-Szenen als Topoi. Museum Helveticum, 21, 197–224.
  • Kanavou, N. (2015). The Names of Homeric Heroes: Problems and Interpretations. De Gruyter.
  • Kardulias, D.R. (2001). Odysseus in Ino’s Veil: Feminine Headdress and the Hero in Odyssey 5. Transactions of the American Philological Association, 131, 23–51.
  • Kranz, W. (1915). Die Irrfahrten des Odysseus. Hermes, 50, 93–112.
  • Laman, B. (1999). Ein Gespräch mit Michael Köhlmeier am 9. April 1998 in Dickinson, North Dakota. Modern Austrian Literature, 32, 94–104.
  • Lamer, H. (1919). Kalypso (Καλυψώ) 1. Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Alter-tumswissenschaft, X.2, 1772–1799.
  • Lesky, A. (1947). Thalatta: Der Weg der Griechen zum Meer. Rohrer.
  • Lohmann, D. (1998). Kalypso bei Homer und bei James Joyce: Eine vergleichende Unter¬suchung des 1. und 5. Buches der Odyssee und der 4. Episode (Calypso) im Ulysses von J. Joyce. Stauffenburg.
  • Louden, B. (1999). The Odyssey: Structure, Narration, and Meaning. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Louden, B. (2011). Homer’s Odyssey and the Near East. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lüthy, A. (1992). Ino-Leukothea: Ursprung und Zusammenfall zweiter Gottheiten in Mythos und Kult (MA Thesis). University of Zurich.
  • Martin Samuel, K. (2012). Disney’s Tia Dalma: A Critical Interrogation of an “Imagineered” Priestess. Black Women, Gender, and Families, 6, 97–122.
  • Mauritsch, P. (1992). Sexualität im frühen Griechenland: Untersuchungen zu Norm und Abweichung in den homerischen Epen. Böhlau.
  • Meillet, A. (1919). Le nom de Calypso et la formation désidérative. Revue des études grecques, 32, 384–387.
  • Moraw, S. (2020). Die Odyssee in der Spätantike: Bildliche und literarische Rezeption. Brepols.
  • Myrsiades, K. (2019). Reading Homer’s Odyssey. Bucknell University Press.
  • Nagy, G. (2020, October 9). Percy Jackson’s visit to Lotus Hotel, viewed through a Homeric lens. Classical Inquiries. https://classical-inquiries.chs.harvard. edu/percy-jacksons-visit-to-lotus-hotel-viewed-through-a-homeric-lens.
  • Nickel, R. (1972). Der Zwang der Kalypso (Odyssee 5,151–155). Philologus, 116, 137–138.
  • Paglia, C. (1997). Homer on Film: A Voyage Through The Odyssey, Ulysses, Helen of Troy, and Contempt. Arion, 5(2), 166–197.
  • Peradotto, J. (1990). Man in the Middle Voice: Name and Narration in the Odyssey. Princeton University Press.
  • Peterli, G. (1976/77). Bildbetrachtung: Telemach auf der Insel der Kalypso von Angelica Kauffmann. Bündner Schulblatt, 36, 206–211.
  • Pontani, F. (2013). Speaking and concealing – Calypso in the eyes of some (ancient) interpreters. Symbolae Osloenses, 87, 30–60.
  • Radermacher, L. (1915). Die Erzählungen der Odyssee. Alfred Hölder.
  • Rafn, B. (1990). Kalypso. Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae, V.1, 945–948.
  • Reinhardt, K. (1948). Die Abenteuer der Odyssee. In H. Küpper (Ed.), Von Werken und Formen: Vorträge und Aufsätze. Küpper. 52–162. Quoted after the reprint in: Becker, C. (Ed.). 1960. Tradition und Geist: Gesammelte Essays zur Dichtung. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 47–124.
  • Riordan, R. (2008). Percy Jackson: The Battle of the Labyrinth. Miramax Books.
  • Schulze, H. (2022). Kalypso, Kirke und die Sirenen: Motive der Odyssee bei Max Beckmann und seinem Meisterschüler Ottokar Gräbner. In K. Dolle & S.A. Dreiling (Eds.), Space Oddities: Die homerische Irrfahrt in Bildkünsten und Populärkultur 1800–2021 (Europa–USA–Südamerika). ART-Books. 461–483.
  • Scully, S. (1987). Doubling in the Tale of Odysseus. The Classical World, 80, 401–417.
  • Small, S.G.P. (1949). On Allegory in Homer. The Classical Journal, 44, 423–430.
  • Thornton, A. (1970). People and Themes in Homer’s Odyssey. Routledge.
  • von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1884). Homerische Untersuchungen. Weidmann.
  • von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1927). Die Heimkehr des Odysseus: Neue homeri-sche Untersuchungen. Weidmann.
  • Wehrli, W. (1928). Zur Geschichte der allegorischen Deutung Homers im Altertum. Noske.
  • West, D.T. (2020). Shipwrecked Spouses: Leukothea’s Veil and Marital Reunion in The Odyssey. New England Classical Journal, 47(2), 1–14.
  • West, E.B. (2004). The Hero’s Handmaid: Female Helpers in the Homeric Epics and the Mahabharata (PhD Thesis). The University of Minnesota.
  • West, M.L. (1966). Hesiod: Theogony. Edited with Prolegomena and Commentary. Clarendon.
  • Woodhouse, W.J. (1930). The Composition of Homer’s Odyssey. Clarendon Press.
  • Zusanek, H. (1996). Kalypso: Untersuchungen zum dios-Begriff 1. Peter Lang.