Abd Almanya ve Türkiye hisse senedi piyasaları arasndaki ilişkinin MS-VAR modeli ile analizi

Bu çalışmada ABD, Almanya ve Türkiye hisse senedi piyasaları arasındaki dinamik ilişkiler Markov Rejim Değişim-Vektör Otoregresif (MS-VAR) model ile araştırılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, MS-VAR modelin piyasalar arasındaki ilişkileri betimlemede doğrusal VAR modele göre daha iyi sonuçlar verdiği belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca; düzgünleştirilmiş geçiş olasılıklarına göre, MS-VAR modelden elde edilen rejimlerin kazandıran ve kaybettiren piyasa dönemleri olarak adlandırılabileceği sonucuna varılmıştır. Rejimlere bağlı Granger nedensellik testi ve etki-tepki analizi sonuçları hisse senedi piyasaları arasındaki ilişkilerin kazandıran ve kaybettiren piyasa dönemlerine göre farklılaştığını göstermektedir.

Analyzing relationship among stock markets of Us, Germany and Turkey with MS-VAR odel

In this study, the presence of dynamic relations among stock markets of the US, Germany and Turkey is examined by means of Markov regime switching-Vector Autoregressive (MS-VAR) model. Empirical results suggest that the MS-VAR model provides a better characterization of relation among stock markets than the linear VAR model. In addition, it is determined that regimes are obtained from the MS-VAR model can be named as bear and bull markets according to smoothed transition probabilities. Regime-dependent Granger causality test and impulse-response functions results show that the^relations among the stock markets have varied due to bear and bull market periods.

___

  • 1. Bayri, O., ve Güloğlu, B.. (2005). Hisse Senedi ve Yabancı Para Piyasalarının Entegrasyonu: Türkiye, AB ve ABD Örneği. İktisat, İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, Sayı (234): 13-34.
  • 2. Ceylan, N. B.. (2006). G-7 Ülkelerinin Borsalarının İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsası Üzerindeki Etkileri. İMKB Dergisi, 32: 37-55.
  • 3. Chang, T., Nieh, C. C. ve Wei, C. C.. (2006). Analysis of Long-run Benefits from International Equity Diversification between Taiwan and its Major European Trading Partners: An Empirical Note. Applied Economics, 38: 2227-2283.
  • 4. Chen S-W.. (2008). Non-Stationarity and Non-Linearity in the Stock Prices: Evidence from the OECD Countries. Economics Bulletin, 3: 1-11.
  • 5. Chen S-W.. (2010) Regime Non-Stationarity and Non-Linearity in Inflation Rates: Evidence from OECD Countries. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 463: 47-57.
  • 6. Cho, J. ve White, H.. (2007). Testing for Regime Switching. Econometrica, 75: 1671-1720.
  • 7. Çıtak, L. ve Gözbaşı, O.. (2007). İMKB İle Bazı Önde Gelen Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülke Borsaları Arasındaki Bütünleşmenin Temel Endeks ve Ana Sektör Endeksleri Temelinde Analizi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 22(2): 103-125.
  • 8. Click, W. R. ve Plummer, G. M.. (2005). Stock Market Integration in ASEAN after the Asian Financial Crisis. Journal of Asian Economics, 16: 5-28.
  • 9. Davies, R. B.. (1987). Hypothesis Testing When The Nuisance Parameter Is Present Only Under the Alternative. Biometrika, 74: 33-43.
  • 10.Efendioğlu, E. ve Yörük, D.. (2005). Avrupa Birliği Sürecinde Türk Hisse Senedi Piyasası ile Avrupa Birliği Hisse Senedi Piyasalarının Bütünleşmesi: İMKB Örneği. http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/yeni/iletisimgm/Enver_Efendioglu-Demet_Yoruk.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 12.12.2011)
  • 11.Egert, B. ve Kocenda, E.. (2007). Interdependence between Eastern and Western European Stock Markets: Evidence from Intraday Data. Economic Systems, 31: 184-203.
  • 12.Ehrmann, M., Ellison, M. ve Valla, N.. (2003) Regime-dependent Impulse Response Functions in A Markov Switching Vector Autoregression Model, Economics Letters, 78: 295-299.
  • 13.Garcia, R.. (1998). Asymptotic Null Distribution Of The Likelihood Ratio Test In Markov Switching Models. International Economic Review, 39: 763-788.
  • 14.Gupta, R. ve Guidi, F.. (2012). Cointegration Relationship and Time Varying Co-movements among Indian and Asian Developed Stock Markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 21: 10-22.
  • 15. Hamilton, J.. (1989). A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle. Econometrica, 57, 357-384.
  • 16.Hamilton, J.. (1994). Time Series Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
  • 17. Hansen, B.. (1992). The Likelihood Ratio Test Under Non-Standard Conditions: Testing The Markov Switching Model of GNP. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 7:61-82.
  • 18. Hansen, B.. (1996). Erratum for the Likelihood Ratio Test Under Non-Standard Conditions: Testing The Markov Switching Model of GNP. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11: 195-198.
  • 19.Hatemi-J, A.. (2012). Is the UAE Stock Market Integrated with the USA Stock Market? New Evidence from Asymmetric Causality Testing. Research in International Business and Finance, 26: 273-280.
  • 20.İsmail, M. T. ve Rahman, R. A.. (2009). Modelling the Relationship between US and Selected Asian Stock Markets. World Applied Sciences Journal, 7 (11): 1412-1418.
  • 21.Kanas, A. ve Genius, M.. (2005). Regime (Non)Stationarity in the US/UK Real Exchange Rate. Economics Letters, 87: 407-413.
  • 22.Kanas, A.. (2006). Purchasing Power Parity and Markov Regime Switching. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 38: 1669-1687.
  • 23.Kanas, A.. (2009). Real Exchange Rate, Stationarity, and Economic Fundamentals. Journal of Economics and Finance, 33: 393-409.
  • 24. Korkmaz, T., E. Atukeren ve Çevik, E. İ.. (2012). Return and Volatility Spillovers among CIVETS Stock Markets. Emerging Markets Review, 13 (2): 230-252.
  • 25. Korkmaz, T., S. Zaman ve Çevik, E. İ.. (2009). İMKB ile Uluslararası Hisse Senedi Piyasaları Arasındaki Entegrasyon İlişkisinin Yapısal Kırılma Testleri İle Analizi. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, Mayıs: 40-71.
  • 26. Korkmaz, T., S. Zaman ve Çevik, E. İ.. (2008). İMKB'nin Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye'nin Yüksek Dış Ticaret Hacmine Sahip Ülke Borsaları ile Entegrasyon İlişkisi. Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4 (8): 19-44.
  • 27.Krolzig, H.. (1997). Markov-Switching Vector Autoregressions Modeling, Statistical Inference, and Application to Business Cycle Analysis. Springer, Berlin.
  • 28.Küçükçolak, N.. (2008). Co-integration of the Turkish Equity Market with Greek and other European Union Equity Markets. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 13: 58-73.
  • 29.Narayan, P. K. ve Smyth, R.. (2004). Modelling the Linkages between the Australia and the G7 Stock Markets: Common Stochastic Trends and Regime Shifts. Applied Financial Economics, 14: 991-1004.
  • 30.Narayan, P. K. ve Smyth, R.. (2005). Cointegration of Stock Markets Between New Zealand, Australia and the G7 Economies: Searching for Comovement under Structural Change. Australian Economic Papers, 44 (3): 231-247.
  • 31 .Onay, C.. (2006). A Co-integration Approach to European Union Integration: The Case of Acceding and Candidates Countries, European Integration Online Papers (ELOP), 10 (7), 1-11, http://eiop.org/eiop/texte/2006-007a.htm, (Erişim Tarihi: 11.01.2012).
  • 32.Onay, C. ve Ünal, G.. (2012). Cointegration and Extreme Value Analyses of Bovespa and the Istanbul Stock Exchange. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 62 (1): 66-91.
  • 33.Qiao, Z., Li, Y. ve Wong, W.-K.. (2011). Regime-Dependent Relationships among the Stock Markets of the US, Australia and New Zealand: A Markov-switching VAR Approach, Applied Financial Economics, 21: 1831-1841.
  • 34.Syriopoulos, T.. (2004). International Portfolio Diversification to Central European Stock Markets. Applied Financial Economics, 14(17): 1253-1268.
  • 35.Tahai, A., Rutledge, R. W. ve Khondkar, K. E.. (2004). An Examination of Financial Integration for the Group of Seven (G7) Industrialized Countries Using an l(2) Cointegration Model. Applied Financial Economics, 14: 327-335.
  • 36.Tarı, R.. (2006). Ekonometri, Avcı Ofset, İstanbul.
  • 37.Taştan, H.. (2005). Dynamic Interdependence and Volatility Transmission in Turkish and European Equity Markets, Turkish Association Discussion Paper 2005/10, http://www.tek.org.tr/dosyalar/turkishvoltrans.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 11.06.2011)
  • 38.Ülkü, N.. (2011). Modeling Comovement among Emerging Stock Markets: The Case of Budapest and Istanbul. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 61 (3): 277-304.
  • 39.Yu, J. S. ve Hassan, M. K.. (2008). Global and Regional Integration of the Middle East and North African (MENA) Stock Markets. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48: 482-504.