COVID-19 Salgınında Sağlık Çalışanlarının Kişisel Koruyucu Ekipman Kullanımları ile Depresyon, Anksiyete, Stres Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişkinin Belirlenmesi

Amaç: Çalışmamızda COVID-19 salgınında sağlık çalışanlarının kişisel koruyucu ekipman kullanımları ile depresyon, anksiyete, stres düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Mayıs 2020’de gerçekleştirilen tanımlayıcı tipteki araştırmamıza bir pandemi hastanesinde çalışan 384 sağlık çalışanı katılmıştır. Veri toplama aracı olarak; tanımlayıcı özellikler, kişisel koruyucu ekipman kullanım durumları ve Depresyon-Anksiyete-Stres Ölçeği’nden (DASS-21) oluşan bir form kullanılmıştır. Formlar, sağlık çalışanlarına çevrimiçi ortamdan ulaştırılmış ve yanıtlar da bu şekilde toplanarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: Çalışmamızda kadın sağlık çalışanlarının Anksiyete ve Stres puanları ile bekâr sağlık çalışanlarının “DASS-21 anksiyete puanı” istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde yüksek saptanmıştır (p=0,008; p=0,001; p=0,019; p0,05). COVID-19 salgını boyunca siperlik ya da gözlük/ koruyucu gözlük kullanım durumlarına göre sağlık çalışanlarının Depresyon, Anksiyete ve Stres puanları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık saptanmıştır (p

Determining the Relationship Between Personal Protective Equipment Uses of Medical Healthcare Workers and Depression, Anxiety and Stress Levels in the COVID-19 Pandemic

Aim: In our study, it was aimed to determine the relationship between the use of personal protective equipment by healthcare workers in the COVID-19 epidemic and their depression, anxiety and stress levels. Material and Methods: 384 healthcare professionals working in a pandemic hospital participated in our descriptive study conducted in May 2020. The data collection tools; A form consisting of descriptive features, personal protective equipment use cases and Depression-Anxiety-Stress Scale (DASS-21) was used. The forms were delivered to healthcare professionals online and the responses were collected and analyzed in this way. Results: In our study, the Anxiety and Stress scores of female healthcare workers and the “DASS-21 anxiety score” of single healthcare workers were found to be statistically significantly higher (p=0.008; p=0.001; p=0.019; p0.05). During COVID-19 pandemic, statistically significant differences were found between Depression Anxiety and Stress scores of healthcare workers according to their visor or goggles / protective glasses use(p

PDF

___

1. Sohrabi C, Alsafi Z, et al. World Health Organization declares global emergency: A review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Int J Surg. 2020;76:71-76.
2. World Health Organization. Novel Coronavirus (‎2019- nCoV)‎: Situation report, 12. World Health Organization. 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/330777.
3. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Haberleri. https://www.saglik.gov. tr/TR,64383/koronavirus-alacagimiz-tedbirlerden-gucludegildir.html.11.03.2020 (Erişim tarihi: 03.07.2020)
4. Zhou F, Yu T, et al. (2020). Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1054-1062.
5. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. https:// covid19.who.int/ (Erişim tarihi: 01.08.2020)
6. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Korona Tablosu. https://COVID19. saglik.gov.tr/ (Erişim tarihi: 01.08.2020)
7. Rothe C, Schunk M, et al. Transmission of 2019-nCoV Infectionfroman Asymptomatic Contact in Germany. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(10):970-971.
8. Kampf G, Todt D, Pfaender S, Steinmann E. Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents. J Hosp Infect. 2020;104(3):246-251.
9. World Health Organization, Novel Coronavirus (2019- nCoV) Advice for the Public, (2020) https://www.who.int/ emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-forpublic.
10. Maunder RG, Lancee WJ, et al. Factors associated with the psychological impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on nurses and other hospital workers in Toronto. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2004;66(6):938-942.
11. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales, 2nd ed. Sydney, Australia: Pychology Foundation of Australia; 1995.
12. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1995;33:335-343.
13. Saricam H. The psychometric properties of Turkish version of Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) in health control and clinical samples. Journal of CognitiveBehavioral Psychotherapy and Research. 2018;7(1):19-30.
14. ChanAO,HuakCY. Psychological impact of the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak on health care workers in a medium size regional general hospital in Singapore. Occup Med (Lond). 2004,54:190-196.
15.Wang C, Pan R, et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1729.
16. Li Z, Ge J, et al. Vicarious traumatization in the general public, members, and non-members of medical teams aiding in COVID-19 control. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;88:916-919.
17. Goulia P, Mantas C, et al. General hospital staff worries, perceived sufficiency of information and associated psychological distress during the A/H1N1 influenza pandemic. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:322.
18. Zhang C, Yang L, et al. Survey of insomnia and related social psychological factors among medical staff involved in the 2019 novel coronavirus disease outbreak. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:306.
19. Clegg A. Occupational stress in nursing: A review of the literatüre. J Nurs Manag. 2001;9(2):101-106.
20. Leung G.M. The impact of community psychological responses on outbreak control for severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57(11):857-863.