SOME PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE BUILDING STONES FROM SOUTHEASTERN ANATOLIA REGION

In this study, some of the physical properties of the Karacadag stone from Diyarbakir, Sanliurfa stone from Sanliurfa, Mardin and Midyat stones from Mardin and Hasankeyf stone from Batman which have been used extensively as a building material in Southeastern Anatolia Region were investigated. The stones having different features have been used as building materials in every places all over the region for ages. Heat and mechanical properties of these stones have not been searched yet. The aim of this work is to find out how suitable these rocks are as structural materials. For this aim, two specimens from different sources for each stone chosen from various places in Southeastern Anatolia Region, have been taken. After chemical analysis, the experiments for determining the heat conductivity and heat capacity, water absorption and mechanical strength were carried out. The results are compared with the other building materials especially in the aspects of energy saving, strength and natural comfort conditions.  

SOME PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE BUILDING STONES FROM SOUTHEASTERN ANATOLIA REGION

In this study, some of the physical properties of the Karacadag stone from Diyarbakir, Sanliurfa stone from Sanliurfa, Mardin and Midyat stones from Mardin and Hasankeyf stone from Batman which have been used extensively as a building material in Southeastern Anatolia Region were investigated. The stones having different features have been used as building materials in every places all over the region for ages. Heat and mechanical properties of these stones have not been searched yet. The aim of this work is to find out how suitable these rocks are as structural materials. For this aim, two specimens from different sources for each stone chosen from various places in Southeastern Anatolia Region, have been taken. After chemical analysis, the experiments for determining the heat conductivity and heat capacity, water absorption and mechanical strength were carried out. The results are compared with the other building materials especially in the aspects of energy saving, strength and natural comfort conditions.

___

  • 1. Devecioglu A.G. (2001), An investigation on the heat conduction parameters of porous building stones, Master Thesis, Firat University.
  • 2. Devecioglu A.G., Biçer Y. & Kavak E. (2001), Diyarbakır Karacadağ taşının bazı fiziksel özellikleri, II. GAP ve SANAYİ Kongresi, 29-30 Eylül, TMMOB Makina Mühendisleri Odası, 401-406, Diyarbakir.
  • 3. Bicer Y., Yildiz C. & Pehlivan D. (1996), Some physical properties of the building stones from Mardin and Its Districts, TIEES-96 First Trabzon International Energy and Environment Symposium, July 29-31, Vol. 3, 1005-1009, July 29-31, Trabzon-Turkey.
  • 4. Bicer Y., Tanyildizi V., Pehlivan D. & Yildirim, S. (1993), A research on the physical features of the natural building materials available in Firat Basin, Cukurova University Journal of Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Vol 8 (2), 53-60.
  • 5. Biçer Y., Devecioglu A.G &Akpinar E.K. (2004), Effective thermal conductivity of porous stones, Firat University Turkish Journal of Science & Technology, 15(4), 613-622. 6. TS 500 and TS 699, (2000), The test and experiment methods of natural building stones, TSE, Ankara.
  • 7. Bicer A. & Kar F. (2017), The effects of apricot resin addition to the light weight concrete with expanded polystyrene, Journal of Adhesion Science and technology, 31(21), 2335-2348.
  • 8. Kaya A, & Kar F. (2017), Thermal and mechanical properties of gypsum plaster mixed with expanded polystyrene and tragacanth, Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 1, 59-65.
  • 9. Kaya A & Kar F. (2016), Properties of concrete containing waste expanded polystyrene and natural resin”, Construction and Building Materials, 105: 572-578.
  • 10. Toksoy M. (1988) Thermal conductivity coefficients of industrial materials, Journal of Engineers and Machinery, 347, 12-15.