___

• Artigue, M., & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM, 45(6), 797-810.
• Awofala, A. O. A. (2014). Examining personalization of instruction, attitudes towards and achievement in mathematics word problems among Nigerian senior secondary school students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(4), 273-288.
• Baki, A. (2008). Kuramdan uygulamaya matematik eğitimi. Ankara: Harf Yayınları.
• Baki, A., & Şahin, S. M. (2004). Bilgisayar destekli kavram haritası yöntemiyle öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel öğrenmelerinin değerlendirilmesi. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(2), 91-104.
• Blum, W., & Leiß, D. (2007). How do students and teachers deal with modelling problems. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum and S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling: Mathematical Modelling: Education, Engineering and Economics - ICTMA 12 (pp. 222-231). Chichester: Horwood Publishing.
• Channon, S., & Crawford, S. (1999). Problem-solving in real-life-type situations: The effects of anterior and posterior lesions on performance. Neuropsychologia, 37(7), 757-770.
• Chapman, O. (1999). Inservice teacher development in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 121-142.
• Christou, C., Mousoulides, N., Pittalis, M., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2005). Problem solving and problem posing in a dynamic geometry environment. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 2(2), 125-143.
• Coşkun, S. (2011). A multiple case study investigating the effects of technology on students' visual and non-visual thinking preferences: Comparing paper-pencil and dynamic software-based strategies of algebra Word problems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
• Creswell, J. W. (2007) Qualitative enquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Çıldır, S. (2012). Limit konusunun bilgisayar ortamında görselleştirilmesi ve fizik öğretmen adaylarının konu hakkındaki görüşleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 42, 143-153.
• Çiftci, O., & Tatar, E. (2014). Pergel-cetvel ve dinamik bir yazılım kullanımının başarı etkilerinin karşılaştırılması. Journal of Computer and Educational Research, 2(4), 111-133.
• Demircioğlu, H., Argün, Z., & Bulut, S. (2010). A case study: Assessment of preservice secondary mathematics teachers' metacognitive behaviour in the problem-solving process. ZDM, 42, 493-502.
• Dimakos, G., & Zaraniz, N. (2010). The influence of the Geometer's Sketchpad on the geometry achievement of Greek school students. The Teaching of Mathematics, 8(2), 113-124.
• Engin, A. O., Tösten, R., & Kaya, M. D. (2010). Bilgisayar destekli eğitim. Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 5, 69-80.
• Ersoy, E., & Başer, N. E. (2013). Matematiksel düşünme ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 21(4), 1471-1486.
• Eu, L. K. (2013). Impact of Geometer's Skechpad on students' achievement in graph functions. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(1), 19-33.
• Furner, J. M., & Marinas, C. A. (2007). Geometry sketching software for elementary children: Easy as 1, 2, 3. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1), 83-91.
• Goldenberg, E. P. (2000). Think (and talking) about technology in mathematics classroom. Retrieved from http://www2.edc.org/mcc/pdf/iss_tech.pdf
• Goldenberg, E. P., Harvey, W., Lewis, P. G., Umiker, R. J., West, J., & Zodhiates, P. (1988). Mathematical, technical, and pedagogical challenges in the graphical representation of functions. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED294712)
• Halat, E. (2007). Views of pre-service elementary teachers on the use of webquest in mathematics teaching. Elementary Education Online, 6(2), 264-283.
• Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2001). Software tools for geometrical problem solving: Potentials and pitfalls. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6, 235-256.
• Hollebrands, K. F. (2007). The role of a Dynamic software program for geometry in the strategies high school mathematics students employ. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 164-192.
• Idris, N. (2009). The impact of using Geometers' Sketchpad on Malaysian students' achievement and van Hiele geometric thinking. Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 94-107.
• Iranzo, N., & Fortuny, J. M. (2011). Influence of GeoGebra on problem solving strategies. In Model-Centered Learning (pp. 91-103). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
• Kağızmanlı, T. B., & Tatar, E. (2012). Matematik öğretmeni adaylarının bilgisayar destekli öğretim hakkındaki görüşleri: Türevin uygulamaları örneği. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 20(3), 897-912.
• Kayan, F., & Çakıroğlu, E. (2008). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel problem çözmeye yönelik inançları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 218-226.
• Kerrigan, J. (2002). Powerful software to enhance the elementary school mathematics program. Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(6), 364-348.
• Kin, C. W. (2003). A comparative study of from 4 students' problem solving strategies with or without using Geometer's Sketchpad. (Unpublished Master Thesis). The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
• Koyuncu, İ, Akyüz, D., & Çakıroğlu, E. (2015). Investigating plane geometry problem-solving strategies of prospective mathematics teachers in technology and paper-and-pencil environments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(4), 837- 862.
• Köse, N. Y., Tanışlı, D., Erdoğan, E. Ö., & Ada, T. Y. (2012). İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmen Adaylarının Teknoloji Destekli Geometri Dersindeki Geometrik Oluşum Edinimleri. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(3), 102-121.
• Laborde, C., Kynigos, C., Hollebrands, K., & Strässer, R. (2006). Teaching and learning geometry with technology. In A. Guttierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 275-304), The Netherlands: Sences Publishers.
• Leong, Y. H. (2001). Effects of Geometers' Sketchpad on spatial ability and achievement in transformation geometry among secondary 2 students in Singapore. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
• Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 763-804). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
• McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education: Evidence based inquiry (6thed.). Boston: Pearson.
• Miles M., & Huberman, M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis (2nd Ed.). California: Sage Publications.s
• Ministry of National Education. (2013). Ortaokul matematik dersi (5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Middle school mathematics education program (5, 6, 7 ve 8. grade]. Retrieved from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/dosyalar/programlar/ilkogretim/matematik_5-8.rar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2005). Technology supported mathematics learning environments. Reston, VA: Author.
• O'Donnell, A. (2011). Using Geometer's Sketchpad to Improve Student Attitude in the Mathematics Classroom. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). College of Arts and Sciences, Minot State University, ND.
• Özdemir, S., & Reis, Z. A. (2013). The effect of dynamic and interactive mathematics learning environments (DIMLE), supporting multiple representations, on perceptions of elementary mathematics pre-service teachers in problem solving process. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 3(3), 85-94.
• Özen, D., & Yavuzsoy-Köse, N. (2013). Investigating pre-service mathematics teachers' geometric problem solving process in dynamic geometry environment. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 4(3), 61-74.
• Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it (2nd Ed.). Priceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Polya, G. (1949). On solving mathematical problems in high school. In S. Krulik & R. E. Reys (Eds.), Problem solving in school mathematics 1980 yearbook (pp. 1-2). Reston, VA: NCTM.
• Poon, K. K., & Wong, H. (2011). Problem solving through an optimization problem in geometry. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 30(2), 53-61.
• Saltan, F., Arslan, K., & Gök, A. (2010, March). Teachers' acceptance of interactive white boards: A case study. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2360-2365), San Diego, CA.
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 334-370). New York: MacMillan.
• Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19-28.
• Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2005). Validation of solutions of construction problems in dynamic geometry environments. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 10(1), 31-47.
• Wilson, J. W., Fernandez, M. L., & Hadaway, N. (1993). Mathematical problem solving. In P. S. Wilson (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics (pp. 57-77). New York: Macmillan.
• Yavuz, G., Arslan, Ç., & Gülten, D. C. (2010). The perceived problem solving skills of primary mathematics and primary social sciences prospective teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1630-1635.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (7thed.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
• Yiğit, M. (2014). A review of the literature: How pre-service mathematics teachers develop their technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(1), 26-35.