Transformation in a housing- design story: Reading the spatial typologies of apartment projects in Hatay-Izmir

The politics of central government or incentives determine new design-systems of housing plots as well as housing units. Especially after the enactment of the law of urban regeneration for risky areas, regeneration of areas under disaster risk, there has been an acceleration in knocking down old buildings and construct- ing new ones in inner cities. Thus, this paper focuses on the changes in housing typologies in Hatay-Izmir, in terms of space syntax parameters through the time period 1960-2000, and interprets the final plan-solutions within the perspective of urban regeneration. By accelerating implementations of the urban transformation projects in Hatay region, alternative plan-typologies coming from the past have undergone the so- called “re-design and transformation” process; however, they have actually been substituted by the “never-changing” plan-templates of the apartment typology. We will examine these changes in plan typologies and spatial organisations of the mentioned apartment-projects on the same plots by utilizing the method of space syntax and visibility analysis (VGA). Transformations in spatial configuration in two periods are interpreted through their relationships to shifts in meaning of privacy and daily life represented by degree of permeability and connectivity of housing-unit-plans based on spatial analysis.

___

Ançel, Ö. (2008). Mimar/Arkitekt Dergisinde Konut Sorununun Ele Alınışı 1931‐1946 (Unpublished master thesis) Gazi University, Ankara.

Akcan, E. (2005). Ambiguities of Transparency and Privacy in Seyfi Arkan’s Houses for the New Turkish Republic. METU JFA 22(2), 25–49.

Alitajer, S.; Nojoumi, G. (2016). Privacy at Home: Analysis of Behavioural Patterns in the Spatial Configuration of Tradition and Modern Houses in the City of Hamedan based on the Notion of Space Syntax. Frontiers of Architectural Research 5, 341–352.

Amorim, L. (2001). Houses of Recife: from diachrony to synchrony. Paper presented at the meeting of the 3rd In-ternational Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.

Archives of Izmir Metropolitan Municipality. 2016. Izmir.

Archives of Izmir Karabağlar Municipality. 2016. Izmir.

Archives of Izmir Konak Municipality. 2016. Izmir.

Batur, A. (1998). Modernleşmenin ve Toplumsal Hareketliliğin Yörüngesinde Mimarlık, in Y. Sey (Ed.). 75 Yıl- da Değişen Kent ve Mimarlık. Istanbul: History Foundation Publications.

Baydar, G. (1993). Between Civilization and Culture: Appropriation of Traditional Dwelling Forms in Early Republican Turkey, Journal of Architectural Education 47,66–74.

Baydar, G. (2002). Tenuous bound- aries: women, domesticity and nation- hood in 1930s Turkey, The Journal of Architecture 7(Autumn), 229–244.

Bourdieu, P. (1996). Physical Space, Social Space, Habitus. Oslo: Institutt for sosiologi og samfunnsgeografi, Uni- versititet Oslo.

Bourdieu, P. (1998). Social space and Symbolic space, in Practical Reason. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Bozdoğan, S. (2001). Modernism and Nation Building: Turkish Architectural Culture in the Early Republic. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Brösamle, M.; Hölcher, C.; Vrachliotis, G. (2007). Multilevel Complexity in terms of Space Syntax: a Case Study. Paper presented at the meeting of the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey.

Deleuze, G.; Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Digital Archives of Erginci Construction Company. 2016. Izmir. Digital Archives of Güler Construc- tion Company. 2016. Izmir.

Eldem, S.H. (1983). Türk Evi, in Elli Yıllık Meslek Jübilesi. Istanbul: Mimar Sinan University.

Griz, C.; Amorim, L. (2015). Luxury is Necessary: Apartment Projects in Recife-Brazil. Paper presented at the meeting of the 10th International Space Syntax Symposium, London, England.

Günay, R. (1998). Türk Ev Geleneği ve Safranbolu Evleri. Istanbul: YEM. Güner, D. (2005). Pekel Apartmanı, in İzmir Mimarlık Rehberi 2005. Izmir: Izmir Chamber of Architects.

Güney, Y.İ.; Wineman, J. (2008). The Evolving Design of 20th Century Apartments in Ankara, Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design 35(4), 627–646.

Güney, Y.İ. (2007). Analyzing Vis- ibility Structures in Turkish Domestic Houses, Paper presented at the meeting of the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey.

Küçükerman, Ö.; Güner, Ş. (1973). The Rooms in the Traditional Turkish House of Anatolia from the Aspect of Spatial Organization. Istanbul: Apa Of- set.

Nişli, F. (1961). Bir Apartman, İzmir, Arkitekt 302, 6–8.

Soyak. (2009). Soyak Mavişehir. Available from Internet: http://www. soyak.com.tr/images/pdf/mavisehir_ brosur.pdf Tetik, K. (1937). Kira Evi (İzmir), Arkitekt 4, 105–106.

Ueno, J.; Nakazawa, A.; Kishimo- to, T. (2009). An Analysis of Pedestri- an Movement in Multilevel Complex by Space Syntax Theory in the Case of Shibuya Station. Paper presented at the meeting of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Stockholm: KTH. Ünsal, B. (1939). Kubik yapi ve konfor, Arkitekt 9(3-4), 60–62.

Vogels, J. 2012. Way finding in Complex Multilevel Buildings: A case study of University Utrecht Langeveld Building (Unpublished Master thesis). Utrecht University, Netherland. Ziya, A. (1931). Binanın İçinde Mi- mar, Mimar 1, 13–17.