In recent decades, the design in various fields has undergone remarkable changes that many theoreticians have tried to define and present new models to promote efficiency or provide more creativity during a design process. But most of the time, designers have to apply processes that are restricted to fixed and repetitive steps, unchangeable copy, or an adaptation of what they have learned from other designers during education in the past. From the authors’ point of view, one of the main issues is how the design process can sufficiently be flexible to be used in all situations. The concept of flexibility is the capability of being used by both experienced and novice designers or architects, the ability of adaptability to unpredictable conditions and time changes, and the ability to avoid fixed and unchangeable steps. In this article, according to library resources, it has been endeavored to disclose six general principles as a flexible framework for design which has crucial effects on the development of creativity in the design process. Based on Delphi’s methodology, the suggested principles are assessed by 20 experts to approve the profound impact of them on improving design process creativity and flexibility. By using these principles and based on the strategies of architects, a wide variety of flexible design process can be organized. "> [PDF] Principles of flexibility in design process, with the approach to creativity in design | [PDF] Principles of flexibility in design process, with the approach to creativity in design In recent decades, the design in various fields has undergone remarkable changes that many theoreticians have tried to define and present new models to promote efficiency or provide more creativity during a design process. But most of the time, designers have to apply processes that are restricted to fixed and repetitive steps, unchangeable copy, or an adaptation of what they have learned from other designers during education in the past. From the authors’ point of view, one of the main issues is how the design process can sufficiently be flexible to be used in all situations. The concept of flexibility is the capability of being used by both experienced and novice designers or architects, the ability of adaptability to unpredictable conditions and time changes, and the ability to avoid fixed and unchangeable steps. In this article, according to library resources, it has been endeavored to disclose six general principles as a flexible framework for design which has crucial effects on the development of creativity in the design process. Based on Delphi’s methodology, the suggested principles are assessed by 20 experts to approve the profound impact of them on improving design process creativity and flexibility. By using these principles and based on the strategies of architects, a wide variety of flexible design process can be organized. ">

Principles of flexibility in design process, with the approach to creativity in design

Principles of flexibility in design process, with the approach to creativity in design

In recent decades, the design in various fields has undergone remarkable changes that many theoreticians have tried to define and present new models to promote efficiency or provide more creativity during a design process. But most of the time, designers have to apply processes that are restricted to fixed and repetitive steps, unchangeable copy, or an adaptation of what they have learned from other designers during education in the past. From the authors’ point of view, one of the main issues is how the design process can sufficiently be flexible to be used in all situations. The concept of flexibility is the capability of being used by both experienced and novice designers or architects, the ability of adaptability to unpredictable conditions and time changes, and the ability to avoid fixed and unchangeable steps. In this article, according to library resources, it has been endeavored to disclose six general principles as a flexible framework for design which has crucial effects on the development of creativity in the design process. Based on Delphi’s methodology, the suggested principles are assessed by 20 experts to approve the profound impact of them on improving design process creativity and flexibility. By using these principles and based on the strategies of architects, a wide variety of flexible design process can be organized.

___

  • Abo, W., Eman Sabry, A. & Osama Khalil, M. (2016). Design Process and Strategic Thinking in Architecture. In proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Architecture, Structure and Civil Engineering (ICASCE’16), London.
  • Akpinar, A., Xu, M. & Brooks, K. R. (2017). Design Thinking: A Model Development Based on Archived Documents. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 34(1), 151-169.
  • Alexioua, K., Zamenopoulosa, T. & Johnson, J. H. (2009). Exploring the neurological basis of design cognition using brain imagining: some preliminary results. Design Studies, 30(6), 623- 647.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Colorado: Westview Press.
  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R. C., Lazwnby, J. & Herron, M. (1999). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154- 1184.
  • Antoniades, A. (1992). Poetics of Architecture: Theory of Design. Toronto: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Augustsson, D. (2018). Collaborative Media in Educational Settings: Teaching as a Design Profession. The International Journal of Design Education, 13(2), 1-19.
  • Boden, M. (1991). The creative mind - myths and mechanisms. London: Wiedenfeld & Nicholson.
  • Broadbent, G. (1973). Design in Architecture: Architecture and the Human Sciences. London: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Casakin, H. (2007). Metaphors in design problem solving: implications for creativity. International Journal of Design, 1(2), 21-33.
  • Chiaradia, A. J., Sieh, L. & Plimmer, F. (2017). Values in urban design: A design studio teaching approach. Design Studies, 49, 66-100.
  • Cho, J. Y. (2017). An investigation of design studio performance in relation to creativity, spatial ability, and visual cognitive style. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 67-78.
  • Couger, J. D. (1995). Creative Problem Solving and Opportunity Finding. Danvers: Boyd and Farser.
  • Crilly, N. (2015). Fixation and creativity in concept development: The attitudes and practices of expert designers. Design Studies, 38, 54-91.
  • Crilly, N. & Cardoso, C. (2017). Where next for research on fixation, inspiration and creativity in design?. Design Studies, 50, 1-38.
  • Daemei, A. B. & Safari, H. (2018). Factors affecting creativity in the architectural education process based on computer-aided design. Frontiers of Architectural Design, 7(1), 100-106.
  • Dalkey, N. & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458–467.
  • Dalkey, N. C. (1971). Studies in the quality of life: Delphi and decision-making. In the Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. Lexington: Lexington Books.
  • Danaci, H. M. (2015). Creativity and knowledge in architectural education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174: 1309-1312.
  • De Bono, E. (2006). Thinking Course: Powerful Tools to Transform Your Thinking. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H. & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes. Glenview: Scott Foresman.
  • Dorst, K. (2009). Layers of design: understanding design practice. In proceedings of IASDR 2009, International Association of Societies of Design Research, Seoul.
  • Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521-532.
  • Dorst, K. & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425-437.
  • Eilouti, B. (2018). Concept evolution in architectural design: an octonary framework. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7, 180-196.
  • Elton, L. (2006). Assessing creativity in an unhelpful climate. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 5(2), 119-130.
  • French, M. (1994). Invention and evolution design in nature and engineering (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • French, M. (1998). Conceptual Design for Engineers (3rd ed.). London: Springer-Verlag.
  • Gero, J. S. (2000). Creativity, emergence and evolution in design. Knowledge Based Systems, 9(7), 435-448.
  • Goel, V. & Pirolli, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16(3), 395-429.
  • Goldschmidt, G. & Smolkov, M. (2006). Variance in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies, 27(5), 549- 569.
  • Green, S., Southee, D. & Boult, J. (2014). Towards a Design Process Ontology. The Design Journal, 17(4), 515- 537.
  • Habibi, A., Sarafrazi, A. & Izadyar, S. (2014). Delphi Technique Theoretical Framework in Qualitative Research. The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 3(4), 8-13.
  • Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J. & Dekoninck, E. (2007). Creativity in the engineering design process. In proceedings of ICED 2007, 16th International Conference on Engineering Design, Paris.
  • Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J. & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29(2), 160-180.
  • Idi, D. & Khaidzir, K. (2015). Concept of Creativity and Innovation in Architectural Design Process. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 6(1), 16-20.
  • Irdayanti, M. N., Ramlee, M. & Abdullah, Y. (2015). Delphi technique: enhancing research in technical and vocational education. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 7(2), 12-23.
  • Johnson, P. & Indvik, J. (1992). The Mindful Use of Mental Capital in Career Development. International Journal of Career Management, 4(2), 8-14.
  • Kalin, N. M. & Barney, D. T. (2014). Hunting for Monsters: Visual Arts Curriculum as Agonistic Inquiry. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 33(1), 19-31.
  • Khurana, A., Rosenthal, S. R. (1997). Integrating the fuzzy front end of new product development. MIT Sloan Management Review, 38(4), 103-20.
  • Kowaltowski, D., Bianchi, G. & De Paiva, V. (2010). Methods that may stimulate creativity and their use in architectural design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(4), 453-76.
  • Kroes, P. (2002). Design methodology and the nature of technical artefacts. Design Studies, 23(3), 287-302.
  • Lawson, B. (2006). How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
  • Lessio, D., Philip, M., Wynn, D. C. & Clarkson, P. J. (2009). Communication and design process planning: initial insights from literature and industry interviews. In proceedings of ICED09, The 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, California.
  • Ludwig, B. (1997). Predicting the future: Have you considered using the Delphi methodology? Journal of Extension, 35(5), 1–4.
  • Maher, M.L. (2001). A model of co-evolutionary design. Engineering with Computers, 16:195-208.
  • Maher, M. L. & Poon, J. (1996). Modelling design exploration as co-evolution. Microcomputers in Civil Engineering, 11, 195-209.
  • Maher, M. L. & Tang, H. H. (2003). Co-evolution as a computational and cognitive model of design. Research in Engineering Design, 14(1), 47-64.
  • Mahmoodi, A. S. (2001). The design process in Architecture: A Pedagogic approach using interactive thinking (Doctoral dissertation). University of Leeds, Leeds.
  • Mahmoodi, A.S. (2005). Thinking in design, interactive thinking in design education. Fine Arts, 20, 27-36.
  • Nagai, Y., Taura, T. & Mukai, F. (2009). Concept blending and dissimilarity: factors for creative concept generation process. Design Studies, 30(6), 648-75.
  • Othman, A. E. & Abdelwahab, N. M. (2018). Achieving sustainability through integrating risk management into the architectural design process. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 16(1), 25-43.
  • Ozsoy, A. (2007). New approaches to creativity and creative thinking. ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 4(2), 1-5.
  • Rahmann, H. & Jonas, M. (2010). Creativity in spatial design processes: establishing a non-routine design approach. In proceedings of ICDC 2010, the First International Conference on Design Creativity, Kobe.
  • Roberts, A. S., Pearce, M., Lieberman, O. & Matsika, W. (2006). The development of values in the studio: a hidden curriculum. In proceedings of CSAAR 2006, The International Conference of the Center for the Study of Architecture in the Arab Region, Rabat.
  • Roozenburg, N. F. & Eekels, J. (1995). Product design: Fundamentals and methods. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Rowe, P. (1987). Design thinking. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Roy, D. & Brine, J. (2013). Design Thinking in EFL Context: Studying the Potential for Language Teaching and Learning. The International Journal of Design Education, 6(2), 1-21.
  • Seggern, H. V. (2008). Exploration: Creativity, understanding and idea. In Seggern, H. V., Werner, J. & Grosse-Bachle, L. (Eds), Creating knowledge. Berlin: Jovis.
  • Smith, S. M. (1995). Getting into and out of mental ruts: a theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. In Sternberg R. J. & Davidson, J. E. (Eds), The nature of insight. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Taura, T. & Nagai, Y. (2013). Concept generation for design creativity: A systematized theory and methodology. London: Springer-Verlag.
  • Van Aken, J. E. (2005). Valid knowledge for the professional design of large and complex design processes. Design Studies, 26(4), 379-404.
  • Williams, A., Ostwald, M. & Askland, H. (2010). Assessing creativity in the context of architectural design education. In proceedings of DRS 2010, The International Conference of Design & Complexity, Montreal.
  • Zainudin, A. (2012). Research Methodology and Data Analysis. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Uitm Press.
A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2564-7474
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2005
  • Yayıncı: İTÜ Rektörlüğü
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

User behaviour and circulation in an Indonesian student communal housing facility: Combining space syntax and Actor Network Theory

Rossa Turpuk GABE, Joko ADIANTO, Dwiki Febri RISTANTO

Mapping relations as a design strategy, physical attraction forces correlation for design thinking

Pelin DURSUN ÇEBİ, Aslı ALDEMİR ÇELEN, Nilufer KOZİKOĞLU

The using of urban park as perceived by visually impaired

Hayriye EŞBAH TUNÇAY, Duygu ÖZGÜR

Reading 19th century architectural and interior space reflections of modernization through the literary space: Émile Zola’s Nana

Büşra AYDIN, Zeynep TUNA ULTAV, Bahar SEZEN, Gizem GÜLER NAKIP

Determination of the difference between environmental attitudes of 1st and 4th year students of landscape architecture

Emine TARAKÇI EREN, Tuğba DÜZENLİ

Critical success factors(CSFs) for e-Business technologies adoption in architectural practice in Nigeria

Eziyi O. IBEM, Egidario B. ADUWO, Emmanuel A. AYO-VAUGHAN, Adedeji O. AFOLABI

Integration of the management theories for enhancing green marketing implementation in the construction industry

Ahmet TUZ, Begüm SERTYEŞİLIŞIK

Walking experience in mixed use developments in Lagos, Nigeria

Adedapo Adewunmi OLUWATAYO, Funmi AKANDE, Ohuntoluwase OLIYIDE, Ajibola AGBOLA, Bolaji ADEREMI LATEEF, Titilope SAMUEL

Decision-making method for choosing best alternatives for internal walls based on cost and sound insulation performance

Bilge ŞAN ÖZBİLEN, Nurgün BAYAZIT

Principles of flexibility in design process, with the approach to creativity in design

Pouya MOLAEI, Mehrdad JAVAHERIAN, Maryam AFZALIPOUR