Local data: A new approach to data in architecture

Data, information and knowledge terms are often used interchangeably. The intention of this paper is to provide a better understanding to data, information and knowledge relation with a relative perspective and to explain the usage of the term data in scientific studies. In addition to that, it is aimed to develop a classification of data for architecture. When the origin of the data is investigated, it shows natural or cultural references. This relation can be used at fundamental classification of data as natural or cultural. Besides, data is inherently associated with place in architecture. In the determination of the parameters related to the place, architectural studies, site planning studies, and legal regulations in architecture and planning are evaluated to construct a data framework. Local data framework has been developed to classify data that are used in architectural design. For the use of architectural site survey, local data provides a systematic classification in relation to location. The architect can easily access the data associated with the place. This approach supports the architect in design by using the local data. This study revisits data with a new approach as local data for use in architecture.

Kaynakça

Ackoff, R. L. (1999). Ackoff ’s Best, From Data to Wisdom. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 170-172.

Aksoy, E. (1975). Mimarlıkta Tasarım, İletim ve Denetim. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul, 81-91.

Anderson, J. (2011). Basics architec-ture 03: Architectural design. AVA Publishing SA, 83-99.

Baker, G. H. (2003). Design strategies in architecture: an approach to the anal-ysis of form. Taylor & Francis, 3-13.

Baskarada, S., & Koronios, A. (2013). Data, information, knowledge, wisdom (DIKW): a semiotic theoret-ical and empirical exploration of the hierarchy and its quality dimension. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, Volume 18 Number 1, 5-24.

Bayazıt, N. (2004). Endüstriyel tasarımcılar için tasarlama kuramları ve metotları. Birsen Yayınevi, 149-150.

Beer, A., & Higgins, C. (2000). En-vironmental Planning for Site Development: A manual for sustainable local planning and design. Routledge, 1-83.

Bielefeld, B., & El Khouli, S. (2017). Basics Design Ideas. Birkhäuser, 11-38.

Birkeland, J. (2002). Design for Sustainability: A Sourcebook of Ecological Design Solutions. Earthscan, London, 52-73.

Boyacıoğlu, C., Pulat Gökmen, G., & Ayıran, N. (2017). Anthropocene idea in modern avant-garde architecture: a retrospective discussion on Wright and Fuller. A | Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 14(2), 105-117.

Brooks, R. G. (1988). Site Planning: Environment, Process, and Develop-ment. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 37-54.

Carmona, M., Tiesdell, S., Heath, T., & Oc, T. (2010). Public Places - Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Architectural Press, 77-266.

Chen, M., Ebert, D., Hagen, H., Laramee, R., Ribarsky, W., Scheuer-mann, G., & Silver, D. (2009). Data, Information and Knowledge in Visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 29(1), 12-19.

Childe, G. (2010). Kendini yaratan insan. Varlık Yayınları, İstanbul, 79-103.

Crouch, D. P., & Johnson, J. G. (2001). Traditions in Architecture: Afri-ca, America, Asia, and Oceania. Oxford University Press, New York, 1-4.

Demir, Y. (2000). An Architecture Information Management System (IMS) for Consideration of Multi-Dimensionality within Wholeness (Un-published doctoral dissertation). İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul, 7-8.

Demir, Y. (2016). Multidimensionality and Unity as Part of Architecture & Nature & Culture Relations. Surviving between Pedagogy and Practice in Architectural Design, İdeal Kültür Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 33-46.

Eco, U. (1998). Faith in Fakes: Travels in Hyper reality. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., Vintage, 135-144.

Farrelly, L. (2012). The fundamentals of architecture. Bloomsbury Publish-ing, 12-33.

Fawcett, A. P. (2007). Architecture design notebook. Routledge, 13-38.

Giannakidou, E., Vakali, A., & Mavridis, N. (2014). Towards a Frame-work for Social Semiotic Mining. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (WIMS14), 21.

Güvenç, B. (1994). İnsan ve Kültür. Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul, 95-101.

Haila, Y. (2000). Beyond the nature-culture dualism. Biology and philosophy, 15(2), 155-175.

Hey, J. (2004). The Data, Informa-tion, Knowledge, Wisdom Chain: The Metaphorical link. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, 26 (De-cember), 1–18.

LaGro, J. A. (2013). Site analysis: Informing context-sensitive and sus-tainable site planning and design. John Wiley & Sons, 29 -188.

Leatherbarrow, D. (1993). The roots of architectural invention: site, enclo-sure, materials. Cambridge University Press, 18-27.

Liew, A. (2007). Understanding Data, Information, Knowledge and Their inter-relationships. Journal of knowledge management practice, 8(2), 1-16

Lynch, K. (1971). Site planning. MIT press, 1-24.

McBride, S. B. (1999). Site Planning and Design. Retrieved from: http://www.rri.wvu.edu/WebBook/McBride/ section3.html (accessed 15 December 2018).

National Planning Policy Frame-work (2018). Website of National Planning Policy Framework. Retrieved from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/740441/National_Planning_Policy_Frame-work_web_accessible_version.pdf (ac-cessed 13 December 2018).

Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli, New York, 6-23.

Ogden, C. K., & Richards, I. A. (1989). The Meaning of Meaning. Har-court Brace Jovanovich, Orlando, Florida, 1-23.

Pitts, A. (2004). Planning and design strategies for sustainability and profit: pragmatic sustainable design on build-ing and urban scales. Architectural Press, 27-84.

Rapoport, A. (2005). Culture, archi-tecture and design. Locke science publishing Company, 92.

Rapoport, A. (2008). Some further thoughts on culture and environment. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, 2(1), 16–39.

Regulation on Making Spatial Plans (2014). Mekansal Planlar Yapım Yönetmeliği. Retrieved from: http://mpgm.csb.gov.tr/mekansal-plan-lar-yapim-yonetmeligi-i-4583 (ac-cessed 15 December 2018).

Rowley, J. (2007). The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163–180.

Sanders, J. (2016). Defining terms: Data, information and knowledge. In SAI Computing Conference (SAI), IEEE, 23-228.

Spreiregen, P. D., & De Paz, B. (2005). Pre-design. Kaplan AEC Architecture, 3-25.

Tekeli, İ. (2010). Toplu eserler (12) gündelik yaşam, yaşam kalitesi ve yerellik yazıları. Tarih Vakfı, 170.

Thomas, D. (2002). Architecture and the urban environment: A vision for the New Age. Architectural Press, 135-193.

Towers, G. (2005). An Introduction to Urban Housing Design: At Home in the City. Architectural Press, 61-110.

Unwin, S. (1997). Analysing Architecture. Routledge, 85-98.

Webster, M. (2018a). Information. Retrieved from: https://www.merri-am-webster.com/dictionary/informa-tion (accessed 13 October 2018).

Webster, M. (2018b). Local. Re-trieved from: https://www.merri-am-webster.com/dictionary/local (ac-cessed 05 December 2018).

Weisdorf, J. L. (2005). From foraging to farming: explaining the Neolithic Revolution. Journal of Economic surveys, 19(4), 561-586.

White, E. T. (1983). Site analysis: Diagramming information for architectural design. Architectural Media, 6-39.

White, L. A. (2016). The evolution of culture: the development of civilization to the fall of Rome. Routledge, 3-30.

Wright, F. L. (1957). A testament. Ann Arbor, MI: Horizon Press.

Zins, C. (2007). Conceptual Approaches for Defining Data, Information, and Knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (January), 479–493.

Kaynak Göster