From rigidity to ephemerality: Architecture as a socio-spatial assemblage of heterogeneous components

This study discusses the idea of ephemeral architecture as an alternative approach to overcoming the rigidity issue of the built environment. Ephemeral architecture is an architectural space that appears and disappears in a short period of time. The ephemerality of such a space indicates that there are components that are not permanently available in the built environment. The question then arises as to what these components are, in what way they are present or available, and how they relate to each other to temporarily form a certain architectural space in the built environment. Using assemblage as the theoretical approach, the study investigates these questions through the case of trader space in the courtyard of the Sunda Kelapa mosque in Jakarta. The research makes three main findings regarding: (1) the heterogeneity of entities that act as architectural components, including everyday items such as clothes, socks and plastic rugs; (2) the process of spatial assemblage in which these entities relate and interact; and (3) social assemblage as the non-physical structure that frames this spatial process.

___

Amborst, T., D’Orca, D., & Theodore, G. (2016). Architecture takes time. In H. Castle & K. A. Frank (Eds.), Architecture timed: designing with time in mind (pp. 108-113). London: John Wiley & Sons.

Anderson, B., Kearnes, M., Mc- Farlane, C., & Swanton, D. (2012). On Assemblages and Geography. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2(2) 171-189, https://doi. org/10.1177/2043820612449261

Bonnemaison, S., & Macy, C., eds. (2008). Festival Architecture. London, England: Routledge.

Cohen, D., & Crabtree, B. (2006, July). Qualitative Research Guidelines Project. Retrieved from http://www. qualres.org/HomeSemi-3629.html

DeLanda, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London, England: Continuum.

Delbeke, M. (2008). Framing history: The Jubilee of 1625, the dedication of new Saint Peter’s and the Baldacchino. In S. Bonnemaison & C. Macy (Eds.), Festival Architecture (pp. 129- 154). London, England: Routledge.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1980).

Dovey, K., Wood, S. (2015). Public/ private urban interfaces: type, adaptation, assemblage. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 8(1) 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.201 4.891151

Edwards, R., & Holland, J. (2013). What is qualitative interviewing? London, England: Bloomsbury.

Frank, K. A. (2016). Designing with Time in Mind [Introduction]. In H. Castle & K. A. Frank (Eds.), Architecture timed: designing with time in mind (pp. 8-17). West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Getz, D. (2007). Event Studies: Theory, Research and Policy for Planned Events. Oxford: Butterworth‐Heinemann.

Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597-606. Retrieved from http:// nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol8/iss4/6

Harris, O. J.T. (2016). Affective architecture in Ardnamurchan: assemblages at three scales. In M. Bille & T. F. Sørensen (Eds.), Elements of architecture: assembling archaeology, atmosphere and the performance of building spaces (pp. 195-212). London, England: Routledge.

Haque, U. (2004). The Choreography of Sensations: Three Case Studies of Responsive Environment Interface. Retrieved from https://www.haque. co.uk/papers/choreography-of-sensations. pdf

Karandinou, A. (2013). No Matter: Theories and Practices of the Ephemeral in Architecture. (C. Eamonn, Ed.). Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.

Kennedy, R., Zapasnik, J., McCann, H., & Bruce, M. (2013). All those little machines: Assemblage as transformative theory. Australian Humanities Review, (55) 45-66.

Lifschutz, A. (2017). Long Life, Loose Fit, Low Energy [Introduction]. In A. Lifschutz (Ed.), Loose-fit architecture: designing buildings for change (pp. 6-17). West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.

Matthews, D. (2008). Special Event Production: The Process. Oxford, England: Butterworth–Heinemann.

Mcfarlane, C. (2011). The city as assemblage: Dwelling and urban space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(4) 649-671. https://doi. org/10.1068/d4710

Mehrotra, R., & Vera, F. (2015). Reversibility: Disassembling the biggest ephemeral mega city. ARQ (Santiago), (90) 14-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/ S0717-69962015000200003

Müller, M. (2015). Assemblages and Actor–networks: Rethinking Socio- material Power, Politics and Space. Geography Compass, 9, 27-41. https:// doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12192

Murray, P., & Brand, S. (2017). Learning from the West Coast: Long-Termism and Change. In A. Lifschutz (Ed.), Loose-fit architecture: designing buildings for change (pp. 24-29). West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.

Monin, E. (2003). The Construction of Fantasy: Ephemeral Structures and Urban Celebrations in France during The Eighteenth Century. In F. S. Huerta (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History: Madrid, 20th-24th January 2003, (3) 1475-1487, ISBN: 84-9728-073-3. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo? codigo=4186498

Pallasmaa, J. (2014). Space, place and atmosphere. Emotion and peripherical perception in architectural experience. Lebenswelt: Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience, (4) 230-245. https://doi. org/10.13130/2240-9599/4202

Partridge, E. (1966). Origins: An Etymological Dictionary of Modern English. London, England: Routledge.

Tschumi, B. (1994). Architecture and Disjunction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2564-7474
  • Yayın Aralığı: 3
  • Başlangıç: 2005
  • Yayıncı: İTÜ Rektörlüğü