Gülşah ELDEN, Mert TAŞ

Numerical Investigation of Anisotropic Electrical Conductivity Effects in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell

The purpose of this study is to investigate numerically the effects of anisotropic electrical conductivity of gas diffusion layers on charge transport in Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) fuel cell. To achieve this purpose, a single phase, three dimensional and anisotropic model is developed by using COMSOL Multiphysics 4.2a software. The numerical model is validated in experimental data which is obtained at the cell temperature of 343 K for the PEM fuel cell having 5x5 cm2 active surface area. To find out numerically the effects of anisotropic electrical conductivity of gas diffusion layers on charge transport, two cases are examined. In the first case, the in-plane electrical conductivity of its is increased gradually as the through plane electrical conductivity is kept constant. In the second case, while the value of in-plane electrical conductivity is a constant, the through plane electrical conductivity is increased. When the both electrical conductivities are compared for all cases, the through plane conductivity has a greater effect on charge transport in PEM fuel cell than the in-plane plane electrical conductivity.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

PEM fuel cell, anisotropic electrical conductivity, numerical model

Numerical Investigation of Anisotropic Electrical Conductivity Effects in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell

Keywords:

PEM fuel cell, anisotropic electrical conductivity, numerical model,

PDF

___

Bernardi D.M., Verbrugge M.W. 1990. Mathematical model of a gas diffusion electrode bonded to a polymer electrolyte. AIChE Journal 37(8), 1151–1163.
Berning T., Djilali N. 2003. A 3D, multiphase, multicomponent model of the cathode and anode of a PEM Fuel Cell. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 150(12), A1589.
Um S., Wang C.Y. 2004. Three-dimensional analysis of transport and electrochemical reactions in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources 125(1), 40–51.
Dutta S., Shimpalee S., Van Zee J.W. 2000. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of straight channel PEM fuel cells. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 30, 135-146.
Berning T., Lu D. M., Djilali, N. 2002. Three-dimensional computational analysis of transport phenomena in a PEM fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources 106(1), 284–294.
Ramesh P., Duttagupta S.P, 2013. Effect of channel dimensions on micro PEM fuel cell performance using 3D modeling. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research 3(2). 353-358.
Gurau V., Liu H., Kakaç S. 1998. Two-Dimensional Model for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal 44(11), 2410–22.
Um S., Wang C. Y., Chen C.S. 2000. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 147(12), 4485–4493.
u H., Wang C.Y. 2004. Experimental Validation of a PEM fuel cell model by current distribution data. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 151(11), A1954.
Iranzo A., Munoz M., Rosa F., Pino J. 2010. Numerical model for the performance prediction of a PEM fuel cell model results and experimental validation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 35(20), 11533–11
Haghayegh M., Eikani M. H., Rowshanzamir S. 2017. Modeling and simulation of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell using computational fluid dynamics. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42(34), 21944–21954.
Bapat C. J., Thynell S. T. 2008. Effect of anisotropic electrical resistivity of gas diffusion layers (GDLs) on current density and temperature distribution in a Polymer Electrolyte Membrane (PEM) fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources 185(1), 428–432.
Zhou T., Liu, H. 2006. Effects of the electrical resistances of the GDL in a PEM fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources 161(1), 444–453.
Ismail M.S., Hughes K.J., Ingham D.B., Ma L., Pourkashanian, M. 2012. Effects of anisotropic permeability and electrical conductivity of gas diffusion layers on the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Applied Energy 95, 50–63.