Döngüsel Ekonomi Modeli ve Atık Yönetiminde Döngülerin Tasarımına İlişkin Bir Değerlendirme

İlk iki sanayi devriminden sonra teknolojik, sosyal ve ekonomik gelişmelerle hızla ilerleyen lineer ekonominin çevre üzerinde geri dönüşü olmayan olumsuz sonuçları olmuştur. Küresel kaynak kullanım hızlı bir oranda artarken, tek kullanımlık yaşam tarzlarımız gezegeni al, yap, kullan, at dünyası haline getirmiş ve atık oluşumu lineer ekonominin en belirgin sorunlarından olmuştur. Mevcut lineer ekonomi modelinin sürdürülebilir olmadığı daha da açık hale gelmektedir, bunun yanında artan nüfus ve kaynaklar üzerindeki talep bu modeli daha da sürdürülemez kılmaktadır. Mevcut tahminler, toplam küresel tüketimin gezegenin kendini yenileme kapasitesini şimdiden %50 oranında aştığını göstermektedir. Doğal kaynakların kullanımının rasyonelleşmesi ve sürdürülebilir olmayan üretim ve tüketim kalıplarının değiştirilmesi için bir şey yapılmadığı takdirde, zaten kritik olan bu durum giderek daha da kötüleşmeye devam edecektir. Toplumu, daha az doğal kaynak girdisiyle daha fazla değer yarabilen bir topluma geçirmek amacıyla, hammadde, kaynak ve yenilenebilir enerji kullanımlarını esas alan yeni bir ekonomik sistemin ortaya çıkması neredeyse bir zorunluluk haline gelmiştir. Bu bağlamda, güncel bir paradigma olan ’Döngüsel Ekonomi’, küresel sürdürülebilirlik baskılarını azaltmaya yardımcı olacak umut verici bir yaklaşım olarak görülmektedir. Literatür araştırmasına dayalı bu çalışma, döngüsel ekonomi modeline odaklanmakta, modeli ve sistemin temelini oluşturan döngüleri incelemekte, model altında önerilen ilgili ürün tasarım stratejilerini atık yönetimi kapsamında değerlendirmektedir. Döngülerin kapatılması ve yavaşlatılması için tasarım stratejilerinin incelenmesi girişimi temelinde, öncü temel çalışmalar kapsamında önerilen modeller ve stratejiler kullanılmıştır. Çalışmalara dayanarak, döngüsel ekonominin atık ve kaynak yönetimi için etkili bir araç olacağı açıktır. Ancak, genel olarak geri dönüşümün, yani döngülerin kapatılmasının döngülerin yavaşlatılmasıyla karşılaştırıldığında daha fazla öne çıktığı görülmektedir. Atık yönetimi hiyerarşisinde, atıkların oluşumundan önce oluşmadan önlenebilmesi önceliklidir; bu doğrultuda döngülerin yavaşlatılmasının döngülerin kapatılmasından daha önemli olduğu değerlendirilmektedir. Diğer taraftan, yalnızca üretim kalıplarının değiştirilmesi yeterli olmayacaktır, tüketim kalıplarının da mutlaka değiştirilmesi gerekmektedir.

An Evaluation on the Circular Economy Model and the Loops Design in the Context of Waste Management

The linear economy, which has grown further with the technological, social and economic developments after the first two industrialrevolutions, had irreversible negative consequences on the environment. While the global resource use has increased rapidly, ourdisposable lifestyles have transformed the planet into a ‘take-make- use and throw’ world and waste generation has become one of theprominent problems of this economy. It is now much clearer that the business as usual linear economy model is not sustainable;besides, increasing population along with the demand on resources makes this model even more unsustainable. Current estimatesshow that total global consumption has already exceeded 50% of the planet's self-renewal capacity. If nothing is done to rationalizethe use of natural resources and to change those unsustainable production and consumption patterns, the situation that is alreadycritical will continue to deteriorate further. To turn the society into a one that can create more value with less natural resource input, anew economic system based on the sustainable use of raw materials, resources and renewable energy is almost a necessity. In thisrespect, a recent paradigm, ‘Circular Economy’, is viewed as a promising approach to help to reduce our global sustainabilitypressures. Based on a narrative literature review, this study focuses on the circular economy, examines the model and the loopsunderlying the system, then analyses the respective product design strategies under the model within the scope of waste management.In its attempt to provide an analysis of the design strategies for slowing and closing the loops, the models and strategies proposed bysome key earlier studies are utilized. Based on the studies, it is evident that the circular economy model would be an effective tool forwaste and resource management. However, in general, it is seen that closing loops through recycling is more prominent compared toslowing loops. In the waste management hierarchy, preventing waste before it is generated has the highest priority, accordingly it isconcluded that slowing loops is even more important than closing loops. Furthermore, changing only the production patterns wouldnot be enough, it is imperative to change the consumption patterns as well.

___

  • Andrews, D., (2015), The Circular Economy, Design Thinking and Education for Sustainability, Local Economy, 30(3), 305-315.
  • Anonymous (2018), Basel Convention. www.basel.int, Accessed: 21.05.2008.
  • Bocken, N. M., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & Van der Grinten, B., (2016), Product Design and Business Model Strategies for a Circular Economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308-320.
  • Buruzs, A., & Torma, A., (2016), A Review on the Outlook of the Circular Economy in the Automotive Industry, https://www.waset.org/downloads/15/papers/17ae060075[6].pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 11.12.2018.
  • The Circularity Gap Report, (2018), https://www.circle-economy.com/the-circularity-gap-report-our-world-is-only-9-circular/ Erişim: 24 Şubat 2018
  • European Academies Science Advisory Council (EASAC) (2015), Circular Economy: A Commentary from the Perspectives of the Natural and Social Sciences. http://www.easac.eu/fileadmin/PDF_s/ reports_statements/EASAC_Circular_Economy_. Web.pdf, Accessed: 20.10.2017.
  • European Commission (EC) (2008), Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008L0098, Accessed: 21.05.2008.
  • European Environment Agency- EEA (2014), Waste Prevention Report, https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/waste-prevention-ineurope-2014, Accessed: 03.11.2017.
  • EEA (2016), Circular Economy in Europe- Developing the Knowledge Base, https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/circulareconomy-in-europe, Accessed: 04.02.2017
  • EEA (2017), Circular by Design – Products in the Circular Economy, EEA Report No 6/2017, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation- EMF (2015a), Towards the circular economy. Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications/towards-a-circular-economy-business-rationale-for-anaccelerated-transition, Accessed: 20.12.2017.
  • EMF (2015b), Delivering the Circular Economy – A Toolkit for Policymakers. https://tinyurl.com/ztd4f2u. Accessed: 11.12. 2017.
  • Haas, W., Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., & Heinz, M.,(2015), How circular is the global economy?: An Assessment of Material Flows, Waste Production, and Recycling in the European Union and the World in 2005, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(5), 765-777.
  • Huda, K. M. N., (2008), Municipal Solid Waste Management - Bangladesh Perspective. Dhaka: Academic Press and Publishers Library.
  • IPCC (2013), Fifth Assessment Report - Climate Change 2013 - IPCC.
  • Jurgilevich, A.et al., (2016), Transition towards Circular Economy in the Food System, Sustainability, Vol. 8, No. 1.
  • Korhonen, J., Nuur, C., Feldmann, A., & Birkie, S. E., (2018), Circular Economy as an Essentially Contested concept. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 544-552.
  • McDonough, W., (1993), Design, ecology, ethics and the making of things: centennial sermon on the 100th anniversary of the Cathedral of St. John the Divine, New York City, Retrieved 7 February, 2010.
  • McDonough, W. and Braungart M., (2002), Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the way we make things, New York, NY: North Point Press.
  • Murray, A., Skene K. and Haynes. K., (2017), The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and its Application in a Global Context, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 140, No.3, pp. 369-380.
  • Murray, S. J., Foster, P. N., & Prentice, I. C., (2012), Future Global Water Resources with respect to Climate Change and Water Withdrawals as Estimated by a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model, Journal of Hydrology, 448, 14-29.
  • OECD (2011), Indicators. Towards Green Growth Monitoring progress.
  • Preston, F. A Global Redesign? Shaping the Circular Economy Briefing Paper. London: Chatham House (2012): 1-20. Erişim Tarihi: Ağustos 2, 2018. https://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/papers/view/182376.
  • Rizos, V., Tuokko, K.& Behrens, A. (2017), The Circular Economy: A review of definitions, processes and impacts. CEPS Research Report No 2017/8, April 2017.
  • Sapmaz Veral, E. (2019), The Recent Measures and The Strategies of The EU Member States Towards Circular Economy Transition, Ankara Review of European Studies, 17 (2), 463-488. DOI: 10.32450/aacd.511998
  • Schaffartzik, A., Mayer, A., Gingrich, S., Eisenmenger, N., Loy, C., & Krausmann, F., (2014), The Global Metabolic Transition: Regional Patterns and Trends of Global Material Flows, 1950–2010. Global Environmental Change, 26, 87-97.
  • Stahel, W. R., (1998), From Products to Services: Selling performance instead of goods, IPTS Report, 27.
  • UN DESA (2015), World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables, Working Paper No 5ESA/P/WP.241, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York.
  • UNEP (2006), Circular Economy: An Alternative for Economic Development.
  • Wilson, D.C., L. Rodic, A. Scheinberg et al., (2012), Comparative Analysis of Solid Waste Management in 20 Cities, Waste Management & Research, 30(3), 237-254
  • Wilson, D. C., Rodic, L., Modak, P., Soos, R., Carpintero Rogero, A., Velis, C. & Simonett, O., (2015), Global Waste Management Outlook (GWMO); Prepared for United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and International Solid Waste Association (ISWA); Wilson, DC, Ed. UNEP International Environment Technology Centre (IETC): Osaka, Japan.