Determining Landscape Character Areas and Types in District Scale: The Sample of Artvin-Savsat-Turkey

Bu çalışmada, -Peyzaj Karakter Analiz? yöntemi, Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi'nde ilçe ölçeğindepeyzaj karakter alanları ve tiplerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla kullanılmıştır. Peyzaj karakter alanlarının turizm ve korunma potansiyelinin belirlenmesinde, bölgesel politikaların geliştirilmesinde ve mevcut arazi kullanım politikalarına entegrasyonunda yerel düzeyde peyzaj karakter analizi yönteminin rolü tartışılmıştır. Çalışma alanının doğal ve kültürel verileri toplanmış, sayısal ortama aktarılmıştır. Peyzaj karakter tiplerinin tanımlanması ve ekolojik analizler Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) kullanılarak değerlendirilirken, peyzaj karakter alanları yerinde gözlem ile -Arazi Sörvey Formu?ndan yararlanılarak tanımlanmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucu 854 peyzaj karakter tipi, 13 peyzaj karakter alanı tespit edilmiştir. Her bir peyzaj karakter alanı için alanı tanımlayıcı kartlar hazırlanmıştır. Sonuç olarak biyolojik çeşitliliğin korunması, kırsal kalkınma ve turizm stratejilerinin geliştirilmesinde PKA yönteminin önemi vurgulanmıştır

İlçe Ölçeğinde Peyzaj Karakter Alanları ve Tiplerinin Belirlenmesi: Artvin-Şavşat Örneği, Türkiye

In this study, the landscape character assessment (LCA) methodology was tested at the district scale in Savsat, which is located in the Turkish Eastern Black Sea Region. In addition, the role of the LCA at a district scale in the determination of the tourism and protection potential of the landscape character areas, the development of the regional policies, and integrating them into current land use policies are also discussed in the study.We usedthe LCA methods in this study. The natural and cultural datawere collected in thestudy areas. The determination of thelandscape character areas and ecological analyses were evaluated in GIS; moreover, thelandscape character areas were identified with ―Area Survey Forms‖. As a result of theanalyses, 854 different landscape character types and 13 landscape character areas were determined. We also prepared identity cards to determinethe landscape character areas.As a result, the importance of LCA Method in protecting biodiversity, rural development, and tourism strategies were emphasized in the study

PDF

___

Anonymous, 2008. Seventh meeting of the Workshops of the Council of Europe for the implementation of the Europe an Landscape Convention. Piestany, Slovak Republic.
Atik, M., Canay İsikli, C., Ortaçeşme, V., Yildirim, E., 2015. Definition of landscape character areas and types in Side region, Antalya-Turkey With Regard To Land use planning. Land Use Policy, vol. 44, pp. 90-100.
Atik, M., Canay Işıklı, R., Ortaçeşme, V., 2016. Clusters Of Landscape Characters As A Way Of Communication İn Characterisation: A Study From Side, Turkey, Journal of Environmental Management v:182, p:385-396
Brabayn, L., 2005. Solutions for characterising natural landscapes in New Zealand using geographical information systems. Journal of Environmental Management 76: 23–34
Chuman, T.,Romportl, D., 2010. Multivariate Classification Analysis of Cultural Landscapes: An Example from The Czech Republic. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.98, pp. 200–209
Erdoğan, A., 2014. Peyzaj Karakter Analizi: Artvin-Şavşat İlçesi Örneği, Atatürk Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilimdalı, Doktora Tezi, Erzurum
Eroğlu, E., 2012. Dağlık Alan Yol Koridorlarında Peyzaj Karakterini Belirleyen Doğal Bitki Kompozisyonlarının Tanımlanması; Ataköy-Sultanmurat-Uzungöl Yol Güzergâhı Örneği. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilimdalı, Doktora Tezi, Trabzon.
Fairclough, G., Lambrick, G., Hopkins, D., 2002a. Historical landscape characterisation in England and a Hampshire case study. In: Fairclough, G., Rippon, S., Bull, D. (Eds.),
Europe’s Cultural Landscape: Archaeologists and The Management of Change. Europae Archaeologiae Consilium, pp. 69–80.
Fairclough, G., Rippon, S., Bull, D. (Eds.), 2002b. Europe’s Cultural Landscape: Archaeologists and The Management of Change. Europae Archaeologiae Consilium, Brussels.
Fairclough, G., Macinnes, L., 2003. Landscape Character Assessment. Guidance for England and Scotland. Topic Paper 5—Understanding Historic Landscape Character. The Countryside Agency, Scottish Natural Heritage, http://www.ccnetwork.org.uk/lca topic 5.htm
Gomez-Sal, A., Belmontes, J.A., Nicolau, J.M., 2003. Assessing Landscape Values: A Proposal for a Multidimensional Conceptual Model. Ecological Modelling, vol.168, pp.319– 341.
Gulinck, H., M. Múgica, J. V. Delucio, and J. A. Atauri. 2001. A framework for comparative landscape analysis and evaluation based on land cover data, with an application in the Madrid region (Spain). Landscape and Urban Planning,vol.55, pp.257–270.
Guneroglu , N., Acar, C., Guneroglu, A., Dihkan, M., 2015. Coastal land degradation and character assessment of Southern Black Sea landscape, Ocean & Coastal Management, v:118 , p: 282-28.
Heritage Council, 2006. Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) in Ireland: Baseline Audit and Evaluation. Final Report to the Heritage Council. Heritage Council, Kilkenny, Ireland.
James, P.,Gittins, J.W., 2007. Local Landscape Character Assessment: An Evaluation of Community-Led Schemes İn Cheshire.Landscape Research, Vol. 32:4, pp.423-442
Jessel, B., 2006. Elements, characteristics and character – information functions of landscapes in terms of indicators. Ecol. Indic. Vol.6, pp.153–167.
Kim, K, H. and Pauleit, S., 2007. Landscape Character, Biodiversity and Land Use Planning: The Case of Kwangju City Region, South Korea.Land Use Policy, vol.4, pp.264– 274.
Luginbühl Y (2002). Landscape identification, assessment and quality objectives using cultural and natural resources. First conference ofthe contracting and signatory states to the European LandscapeConvention Council of Europe, Palais de l’Europe, Strasbourg.
Martin, J., 2004. Applications of Landscape Character Assessment. In: Bishop, K., Phillips, A. (Eds.), Countryside Planning. Earthscan, London, pp. 203–221.
Mücher, C.A., 2010. A new European Landscape Classification (LANMAP): A transparent, flexible and user-oriented methodology to distinguish landscapes. Ecological Indicators, vol. 10, pp:87–103.
Swanwick, C., 2002. Landscape Character Assessment. Guidance for England and Scotland. Countryside Agency, Cheltenham/Scottish National Heritage, Edinburgh.
Swanwick, C., 2004. The assessment of countryside and landscape character in England: an overview. In: Bishop, K., Phillips, A. (Eds.), Countryside Planning: New Approaches to Management and Conservation. Earthscan, London, pp. 109–124.
Swanwick, C., 2006. The Role of Landscape Character Assessment in `Farming, Forestry and the National Heritage – Towards a more Integrated Future´. Davison, R. and Galbraith, C. (eds) The Stationery Office, Edinburgh.
Therivel, R., Paridario, R., 1996. Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment. Earthscan, London
Turner, S.C., 2005. Devon Historic Landscape Characterisation. Devon County Council Historic Environment Service/English Heritage, Exeter.
Uzun, O., Dilek, E.F., Çetinkaya, G., Erduran, F., veAçıksöz, S., 2010, Bozkır-Seydişehir-Ahırlı Yalıhüyük, İlçeleri ve Suğla Gölü Mevkii Peyzaj Yönetimi Koruma ve Planlama Projesi Sonuç Raporu. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı Doğa Koruma ve Milli Parklar Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
Uzun, O., Dilek, E.F., Çetinkaya, G., Erduran, F., veAçıksöz, S., 2011, National and regional landscape classification and mapping of Turkey: Konya closed basin, Sula Lake and its surrounding area. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, Vol. 6(3), pp. 550-565.
Van Eetvelde, V., Antrop, M., 2007. Integrating cultural themes in landscape typologies. In: Roca, Z., Spek, T., Terkenli, T., Höchtl, F. (Eds.), European Landscapes and Lifestyles: The Mediterranean and Beyond. Proceedings of the 21st PECSRL Conference ―One Region, Many Stories: Mediterranean Landscapes in a Changing Europe‖, Limnos and Lesvos, 2004. Lisboa: Edic¸˝ oesUniversitáriasLusófonas. Edic¸˝ oesUniversitáriasLusófonas, Lisboa, pp. 399–411.
Van Eetvelde, V., Antrop, M., 2009. A stepwise multi-scaled landscape typology and characterisation for trans-regional integration, applied on the federal state of Belgium. Landsc. Urban Plan, vol. 91, pp. 160–170.
Vogiatzakis, I.N., Griffiths, G.H., Melis, M.T., Marini, A., Careddu, M.B., 2006. Landscape typology in the Mediterranean context: a tool for habitat restoration. J. Mediterr. Ecol., vol. 7, pp.23–30.
Wascher, D.M., 2005. European Landscape Character Areas.Typologies, Cartography and Indicatorsfort he Assessment of Sustainable Landscapes. Landscape Europe, Oxford
Wascher, D. M., Groom, G., Mücher, S., Kindler, A. , Blustt, G., Damarad, T., Nieto A., Delbaere, B. et al., 2005. ―European Landscape Character Areas Typologies, Cartography and Indicators for the Assessment of Sustainable Landscapes‖. Final Project Report Project: FP5 EU Accompanying Measure Contract: ELCAI-EVK2- CT-2002-80021, Home page: www.elcai.org, Co ordinator: Dirk Wascher. Alterra Report No: 1254/December 2005.
Wrbka, T., Reiter, K., Szerencsits, E., Mandl, P., Bartel,A., Schneider, W. and Suppan, F., 1999. Landscape structure derived from satellite images as indicator for sustainable landuse. In: Nieuwenhuis, G.J.A., Vaughan, R.A. and Molenaar, M. (eds). Operational Remote Sensing for Sustainable Development. pp. 119–129, Balkema, Rotterdam