Rotary Drum Filter Effectiveness in Suspended Solids Removal from Trout Farm Discharges - A Case Report

Rotary Drum Filter Effectiveness in Suspended Solids Removal from Trout Farm Discharges - A Case Report

Utilization of micro-screen filters for mitigation of aquaculture impacts onreceiving water bodies has been widened in recent years. However, there arelimited practical data on treatment efficiencies of rotary drum filters (RDF) in farmswith high production capacities and flow rates. The present study aimed to assesseffluent suspended solids treatment efficiencies of RDFs with 200 μm mesh size in8 flow-through rainbow trout farms. The average concentrations of totalsuspended solids (TSS) were between 2.6±1.1 mg/L and 6.0±4.3 mg/L in farm outletwaters. The average treatment efficiencies of RDFs for total suspended solids werebetween 18 and 32%, while they were between 28 and 53% for farm-derivedsuspended solids. Treatment efficiency of RDFs did not relate linearly to inlet andoutlet total suspended solids concentrations as well as farm-derived suspendedsolids (FSS) (P>0.05). The results indicate that relatively low TSS concentrationsresulting from rainbow trout aquaculture in flow-through farms can reducetreatment efficiency of RDFs. The study also shows that the average treatmentefficiency of RDFs with a mesh size of 200 μm in removal of FSS may reach up to40%.

___

  • Ali, S.A. (2013). Design and evaluate a drum screen filter driven by undershot waterwheel for aquaculture recirculating systems. Aquacultural Engineering, 54, 38-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2012.10.006
  • APHA, AWWA & WEF (1998). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
  • Aubin, J., Tocqueville, A., & Kaushik, S.J. (2011). Characterisation of waste output from flow-through trout farms in France: comparison of nutrient mass- balance modelling and hydrological methods. Aquatic Living Resources, 24, 63-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/alr/2011008
  • Bergheim, A., &Brinker, A. 2003. Effluent treatment for flow through systems and European Environmental Regulations. Aquacultural Engineering, 27, 61-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8609(02)00041-9
  • Bergheim, A., Cripps, S.J., & Liltved, H. (1998). A system for the treatment of sludge from land-based fish-farms. Aquatic Living Resources, 11, 279-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0990-7440(98)80013-2
  • Boyd, C.E. (2003). Guidelines for aquaculture effluent management at the farm-level. Aquaculture, 226, 101- 112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00471-X
  • Brinker, A., & Rösch, R. (2005). Factors determining the size of suspended solids in a flow-through fish farm. Aquacultural Engineering, 33, 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2004.10.003
  • Cripps, S.J. (1994). Minimizing outputs: treatment. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 10, 284-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439- 0426.1994.tb00168.x
  • Cripps, S.J. (1995). Serial particle size fractionation and characterisation of an aquacultural effluent. Aquaculture, 133, 323-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(95)00021-S
  • Cripps, S.J., & Bergheim, A. (2000). Solids management and removal for intensive land-based aquaculture production systems. Aquacultural Engineering, 22, 33- 56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8609(00)00031-5
  • Dolan, E., Murphy, N., & O’Hehir, M. (2013). Factors influencing optimal micro-screen drum filter selection for recirculating aquaculture systems. Aquacultural Engineering, 56, 42-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2013.04.005
  • FAO (2006). State of world aquaculture 2006. Fisheries Technical Paper No. 500. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 134pp.
  • Kelly, L.A., Bergheim, A., & Stellwagen, J. (1997). Particle size distribution of wastes from freshwater fish farms. Aquaculture International, 5, 65-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02764788
  • Koçer, M.A.T., & Sevgili, H. (2014). Parameters selection for water quality index in the assessment of the environmental impacts of land-based trout farms. Ecological Indicators, 36, 672-681. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.034
  • Koçer, M.A.T., Kanyılmaz, M., Yılayaz, A., & Sevgili, H. (2013). Waste loading into a regulated stream from land-based trout farms. Aquaculture Environment Interactions, 3, 187-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/aei00059
  • Lekang, O.-I. 2013. Aquaculture engineering. West Sussex, UK, John Wiley & Sons, 432pp.
  • MacMillan, J.R., Huddleston, T., Woolley, M., & Fothergill, K. (2003). Best management practice development to minimize environmental impact from large flow- through trout farms. Aquaculture, 226, 91-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00470-8
  • Maillard, V.M., Boardman, G.D., Nyland, J.E., & Kuhn, D.D. (2005). Water quality and sludge characterization at raceway-system trout farms. Aquacultural Engineering, 33, 271-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.02.006
  • Myers, R.H. Montgomery, D.C., Vining, G.G., & Robinson, T.J. (2010). Generalized linear models: with applications in engineering and the sciences. Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, 544pp.
  • Martins, C.I.M., Eding, E.H., Verdegem, M.C.J., Heinsbroek, L.T.N., Schneider, O., Blancheton, J.P., d’Orbcastel, E.R., & Verreth, J.A.J. (2010). New developments in recirculating aquaculture systems in Europe: A perspective on environmental sustainability. Aquacultural Engineering, 43, 83-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2010.09.002
  • Sindilariu, P.-D. (2007). Reduction in effluent nutrient loads from flow-through facilities for trout production: a review. Aquaculture Research, 38, 1005-1036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2007.01751.x
  • Sindilariu, P.-D., Brinker, A., & Reiter, R. (2009a). Waste and particle management in a commercial, partially recirculating trout farm. Aquacultural Engineering, 41, 127-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2009.03.001
  • Sindilariu, P.-D., Reiter, R.,& Wedekind, H. (2009b). Impact of trout aquaculture on water quality and farm effluent treatment options. Aquatic Living Resources, 22, 93-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/alr/200900
  • Stewart, N.T., Boardman, G.D., & Helfrich, L.A. (2006). Treatment of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) raceway effluent using baffled sedimentation and artificial substrates. Aquacultural Engineering, 35, 166-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2006.01.001
  • Subasinghe, R., Soto, D., & Jia, J. (2009). Global aquaculture and its role in sustainable development. Reviews in Aquaculture, 1, 2-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-5131.2008.01002.x
  • Suhr, K.I., Pedersen, P.B., & Arvin, E. (2013). End-of-pipe denitrification using RAS effluent waste streams: Effect of C/N-ratio and hydraulic retention time. Aquacultural Engineering, 53, 57-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2012.11.005
  • Summerfelt, R.C., & Penne, C.R. (2005). Solids removal in a recirculating aquaculture system where the majority of flow bypasses the microscreen filter. Aquacultural Engineering, 33, 214-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.02.003
  • Tal, Y., Schreier, H.J., Sowers, K.R., Stubblefield, J.D., Place, A.R., & Zohar, Y. (2009). Environmentally sustainable land-based marine aquaculture. Aquaculture, 286, 28- 35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.08.043
  • Tello, A., Corner, R.A., & Telfer, T.C. (2010). How do land- based salmonid farms affect stream ecology? Environmental Pollution, 158, 1147-1158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.11.029
  • True, B., Johnson, W., & Chen, S. (2004). Reducing phosphorus discharge from flow-through aquaculture I: facility and effluent characterization. Aquacultural Engineering, 32, 129-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2004.08.001
  • Wakeman, R. 2007. The influence of particle properties on filtration. Separation and Purification Technology, 58, 234-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2007.03.018
Aquaculture Studies-Cover
  • ISSN: 2618-6381
  • Yayın Aralığı: 6
  • Başlangıç: 2001
  • Yayıncı: SU ÜRÜNLERİ MERKEZ ARAŞTIRMA ENSTİTÜSÜ
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Evaluation of Natural and Synthetic Carotenoid Supplementation on Growth, Survival, Total Carotenoid Content, Fatty Acids Profile and Stress Resistance of European Seabass, Dicentrarchus labrax, Fry

Ashraf Abdelsamee GODA, Ahmed Elsayed SALLAM, Tarek Mohamed Srour

The Effects of Dietary Supplement of Rounded Brittle Fern Weed (Laurencia obtusa) (Hudson) (J.V.Lamouroux, 1813) as a Natural Carotenoid on Pigmentation in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Ali KARACUHA, Dilara KAYA ÖZTÜRK, Birol BAKİ, Murat KERİM, Bora EYÜBOĞLU

Response of Clarias gariepinus (juveniles) Exposed to Sub- lethal Concentrations of Atrazine

Popoola Omoniyi MICHAEL, Ogunrotimi Bosede VEROCANICA, Eitokpah PRISCILLA

Growth, Hematology and Immuno-Modulatory Potential of Ginger (Zingiber officinale) Supplemented Diets in Clarias gariepinus Juvenile (Burchell, 1822)

Stanley C. IHEANACHO, Miracle OGBU, Emmanuel UDE, Ekeziel AYOTUNDE, Emmanuel OGUEJİ

Preliminary Effects of Dietary Protein Levels on Muscle Quality and Digestive Enzyme Activities in GIFT-Oreochromis niloticus

Huizan YANG, Jinzhao HE, Min LV, Gunghua HUANG, Pengfei FENG, Luting WEN, Huawei MA, Tingjun HU, Xianda BI

A Prelimnary Survey on Perception of Turkish Aquaculture Stakeholders on Climate Change-Aquaculture Interactions

Ferit RAD, Tevfik AYTEMİZ, Isa SEN

Rotary Drum Filter Effectiveness in Suspended Solids Removal from Trout Farm Discharges - A Case Report

Faruk PAK, Ozgur AKTAS, Ramazan UYSAL, Mehmet Ali Turan KOCER, Hatice ORUÇ