Pre-pubertal labial adhesion surgery: The first study to compare manual or surgical separation
Pre-pubertal labial adhesion surgery: The first study to compare manual or surgical separation
Aim: Labial adhesion (LA) is one of the most common causes of admission to the pediatric surgery outpatient clinic among theprepubertal girls. There is no consensus on the best interventional technique (manual or surgical separation) for LA. The aim of thisstudy is to compare the results of the manual and surgical separation of LA, and to decide which one is superior.Material and Methods: We reviewed the medical records of sixty-six patients with LA operated between July 2016 and Mart 2018by the same surgeon. The patients were divided into two groups: patients treated with a manual separation technique (group 1) andwith a surgical separation technique (group 2). Patients were evaluated regarding age at presentation, referral indication, symptoms,surgical technique, recurrence and time of recurrence.Results: There were 27 cases in Group 1 and 39 cases in Group 2. There were 14 recurrences in Group 1 (51.8%) and 5 recurrences inGroup 2 (12.8%). The recurrence rate was significantly higher in Group 1. This difference between groups was statistically significant(p=0.0006). The relative risk for recurrence in Group 1 was found to be 4.0444 (OR 7.3231; p=0.0012), and 0.2473 in Group 2 with asignificance level of p=0.0022.Conclusion: The treatment of labial adhesion with the surgical separation technique is superior to manual separation in terms of thepossibility of recurrence. Additional prospective studies are still needed to strengthen these data.
___
- 1. Bacon JL. Prepubertal labial adhesions. Evaluation of a
referral population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:327-32.
- 2. Eyk NV, Allen L, Giesbrecht E, et al. Pediatric vulvovaginal
disorders: A diagnostic approach and review of the literature.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009;31:850-62.
- 3. Leung AKC, Robson WLM, Tay-Uyboco J. The incidence
of labial fusion in children. J Paediatr Child Health
1993;29:235-6.
- 4. Garden AS. Vulvovaginitis and other common childhood
gynaecological conditions. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed
2001;96:73-8.
- 5. Bacon JL, Romano ME, Quint EH. Clinical recommendation:
Labial adhesions. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2015;28:405-9.
- 6. McCann J, Wells R, Simon M, et al. Genital findings in
prepubertal girls selected for nonabuse: A descriptive study.
Pediatrics 1990;86:428-39.
- 7. Rubinstein A, Rahman G, Risso P, et al. Labial adhesions:
Experience in a children’s hospital. Arch Argent Pediatr
2018;116:56-68.
- 8. Norris JE, Elder CV, Dunford AM, et al. Spontaneous
resolution of labial adhesions in pre-pubertal girls. J
Paediatr Child Health 2018;54:748-53.
- 9. Muram D. Treatment of prepubertal girls with labial
adhesions. J PediatrAdolesc Gynecol 1999;12:67-70.
- 10. Capraro VJ, Greenberg H. Adhesions of the labia minora. A
study of 50 patients. Obstet Gynecol 1972;39:65-9.
- 11. Aribarg A. Topical estrogen therapy for labial adhesions in
children. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975;82:424-5.
- 12. Khanam W, Chogtu L, Mir Z, et al. Adhesion of the labia
minora-a study of 75 cases. Obstet Gynecol Surv
1978;33:364-5.
- 13. Cağlar MK. Serum estradiol levels in infants with and
without labial adhesions: the role of estrogen in the etiology
and treatment. Pediatr Dermatol 2007;24:373-5.
- 14. Eroglu E, Yip M, Oktar T, et al. How should we treat
prepubertal labial adhesions? Retrospective comparison
of topical treatments: Estrogen only, betamethasone only,
and combination estrogen and betamethasone. J Pediatr
Adolesc Gynecol 2011;24:389-91.
- 15. Mayoglou L, Dulabon L, Martin-Alguacil N, et al. Success
of Treatment Modalities for Labial Fusion: A Retrospective
Evaluation of Topical and Surgical Treatments. J Pediatr
Adolesc Gynecol 2009;22:247-50.
- 16. Hutson JM, O’Brien M, Beasley SW, et al. Part IV: Abdomen:
anus perineum and female genitalia. in: hutson jm, o’brien
m, beasley sw, teague wj, king sk, editors. jones’ clinical
paediatric surgery. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2015. pp. 164-
71.
- 17. Nurzia M, Eickhorst K, Ankem M, et al. The surgical treatment
of labial adhesions in pre-pubertal girls. J Pediatr Adolesc
Gynecol 2003;16:2-3.
- 18. Bussen S, Eckert A, Schmidt U, et al. Comparison of
conservative and surgical therapy concepts for synechia
of the labia in prepubertal girls. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd
2016;76:390-5.
- 19. Watanabe T, Matsubara S, Fujinaga Y, et al. Manual
separation followed by local cleanliness for pediatric labial
adhesion. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2010;36:667-70.
- 20. Silva D, Jayalath GK, Ranaweera AK, et al. A new method of
surgical treatment for recurrent labial adhesions in a prepubertal
girl. Ceylon Med J 2012;57:168-9.
- 21. Balcı O, Karaman A, Erturk A, et al. [Labial Fusion in
Prepubertal Girls]. Turkish J Pediatr Dis 2015;3:195-7.
- 22. Christensen EH, Oster J. Adhesions of labia minora (synechia
vulvae) in childhood. A review and report of fourteen cases.
Acta Paediatr Scand 197160:709-15.
- 23. Nowlin P, Adams JR, Nalle BC. Vulvar fusion. J Urol
1949;62:75-9.