Comparison of different arm positions and angles with ultrasound for infraclavicular b

Aim: Nerve blocks are used more frequently with the introduction of ultrasound. Anesthesiologists prefer the infraclavicular nerveblock because of its ease of administration and lack of complications. During the infraclavicular block, it is unclear to what angle thearm is to be given and in what position it is to be made. In our study, we aimed to measure and compare the distances of the axillaryartery from the skin by giving different angles to the arm in the presence of ultrasound.Material and Methods: A total of 30 volunteers between the ages of 20-65 included in the study. While the forearm was in theanatomic position (Group A), the arm abducted from the shoulder at 0.45 and 90 degrees. At each angle, the distances of the differentpoints of the axillary artery (posterior, anterior and central) to the skin compared. The same measurements repeated by flexing theforearm at 90 degrees from the elbow (Group B).Results: In Group A and Group B, the distances of all points of the axillary artery to the skin found to be inversely proportional to theabduction angle. In all measurements, the shortest skin distance found at 90 degrees of abduction angle (p< 0.05). There was nostatistically significant difference between Group A and Group B in the same anglesConclusion: When performing ultrasound guided infraclavicular block, anesthesiologists should prefer the easiest method. We foundthat the distance of the axillary artery to the skin and needle entry decreased as the abduction angle of the arm increased in threedifferent measurements. As a result of our study, we believe that the best angle for the infraclavicular block can be done by giving90 degree abduction angle to the arm.

PDF

___

1. Valentin N, Lomholt B, Jensen JS, et al. Spinal or general anaesthesia for surgery of the fractured hip? A prospectivestudy of mortality in 578 patients. Br J Anaesth 1986;58:284-91.
2. Vorobeichik L, Brull R, Bowry R, et al. Should continuous rather than single-injection interscalene block be routinely offered for major shoulder surgery? A meta-analysis of the analgesic and side-effects profiles. Br J Anaesth 2018;120:679-92.
3. Gianesello L, Pavoni V, Burzio I, et al. Respiratory effect of interscalene brachial plexus block vs combined infraclavicular plexus block with suprascapular nerve block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. J Clin Anesth 2018;44:117-8.
4. Stern C, Newsom CT. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block for regional anaesthesia of the lower arm. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015;13:35-6.
5. Fuzier R. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block. Ann Fr AnesthReanim 2012;31:e211-2.
6. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39:175- 91.
7. Rodríguez J, Bárcena M, Taboada-Muñiz M, et al. A comparison of single versus multiple injections on the extent of anesthesia with coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 2004;99:1225-30.
8. Gauss A, Tugtekin I, Georgieff M, et al. Incidence of clinically symptomatic pneumothorax in ultrasound-guided infraclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Anaesthesia 2014;69:327-36.
9. Ootaki C, Hayashi H, Amano M. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: an alternative technique to anatomical landmark-guided approaches. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000;25:600-4.
10. Sauter AR, Smith HJ, Stubhaug A, et al. Use of magnetic resonance imaging to define the anatomical location closest to all three cords of the infraclavicular brachial plexus. Anesth Analg 2006;103:1574-6.
11. Cornish PB, Nowitz M. A magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the infraclavicular region: can brachial plexus depth be estimated before needle insertion? Anesth Analg 2005;100:1184-8.
12. Ruíz A, Sala X, Bargalló X, et al. The influence of arm abduction on the anatomic relations of infraclavicularbrachial plexus: an ultrasound study. Anesth Analg 2009;108:364-6.
13. Bigeleisen P, Wilson M. A comparison of two techniques for ultrasound guided infraclavicular block. Br J Anaesth 2006;96:502-7.
14. Zaragoza-Lemus G, Hernández-Gasca V, Espinosa- Gutiérrez A. [Ultrasound-guided continuous infraclavicular block for hand surgery: technical report arm position for perineural catheter placement]. Cir Cir. 2015;83:15-22.
15. Wang FY, Wu SH, Lu IC, et al. Ultrasonographic examination to search out the optimal upper arm position for coracoid approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus block--a volunteer study. Acta Anaesthesiol 2007;45:15-20.