Şenay Burçin ALKAN, Rukiye SOYAL, Erdi SEÇKİN, Musa ACAR, Ismet TOLU, Seher SARİCAT, Rabia YILDIZ

Morphometric analysis of cervical vertebrae with multidetector computerized tomography

Aim: We aimed to present some morphometric values of the cervical vertebra in our study.Materials and Methods: The study was performed on 100 individuals (50 females-50 males) aged between 20 and 80 years withmultidetector computed tomography and cervical vertebrae. Parameters are measured and recorded in our work; sagittal diameterof foramen vertebra, transverse diameter of foramen vertebra, sagittal diameter of corpus vertebra, transverse diameter of corpusvertebra and corpus vertebra height.Findings: We investigated whether there was a statistically significant difference between men and women. Sagittal diameter ofcorpus vertebra and transverse diameter of corpus vertebra values were significantly higher in all cervical vertebrae than in females(p

PDF

___

1. Barut Ç, Sevinç Ö, İş M, ve ark. Alt Servikal Bölgede Vertebra ve Disk Morfometrisinin Değerlendirilmesi Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi 2008;39:111-6.
2. Arıncı K, Elhan A, Anatomi. I cilt, Güneş Kitabevi, Ankara 2006:58-9.
3. Çimen A. Omurganın Servikal Bölümü ve Ağrı Ağrı 2007;19:13-9.
4. Karaeminogulları O, Aydınlı U. Dejeneratif Lomber Spinal Stenoz. TOTBİD Dergisi 2004;3:3-4.
5. Morishita Y, Naito M, Hymanson H, et al. The relationship between the cervical spinal canal diameter and the pathological changes in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 2009;18:877–83.
6. Evangelopoulos D, Kontovazenitis P, Kouris S, et al. Computerized Tomographic Morphometric Analysis of the Cervical Spine. Open Orth J 2012;6:250-4.
7. Göçmez C, Kamaşak K. Önemli bir tetraparezi nedeni: Servikal spondilotik miyelopati. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 2013;40:513-20.
8. Wang Z, Leng J, Liu J, et al. Morphological study of the posterior osseousstructures of subaxial cervical spine in a population from northeastern China. J Orth SurgRes2015;10:53.
9. Payne EE, Spillane JD. The cervical spine: an anatomicopathologicalstudy of 70 specimens (using a special technique) with particular reference to the problem of cervical spondylosis. Brain 1957;80:571-96.
10. Gupta SK, Roy RC, Srivastava A. Sagittal diameter of thecervical canal in normal Indian adults. Clin Radiol 1982;33:681-5.
11. Desdicioğlu K, Öztürk K, Çizmeci G, et al. Vertebralara ait anatomik yapıların morfometrik olarak incelenmesi ve klinik açıdan değerlendirilmesi: anatomik çalışma. Sdü Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 2017;1.
12. Tatarek N. Variation in the human cervical neural canal. Spine J 2005;5:623–31.
13. Saluja S, Patil S, Vasudeva N. Morphometric analysis of sub-axial cervical vertebrae and its surgical implications. J ClinDiagnostic Re 2015;9:1-4.
14. Matveeva N, Janevski P, Nakeva N, et al. Morphometric analysis of the cervical spinal canal on mri. contributions. Sec Med Sci ,2013;2: XXXIV.
15. Abuzayed B, Tutunculer B, Kucukyuruk B, et al. Anatomic basis of anterior and posterior instrumentation of the spine: morphometric study. Surg Radiol Anat 2010;32:75–85.
16. Bazaldúa C.JJ, González LA, Gómez SA, et al. Morphometric study of cervical vertebrae c3-c7 in a population from northeastern Mexico. Int J Morphol 2011;29:325-30.
17. Acar M, Ulusoy M, Zararsız İ, et ol. Lumbal vertebraların multidedektör komputerize tomografi yöntemi ile morfometrik analizi. Eur J Basic Med Sci 2013;3:34-7.