Correlation between perforated appendicitis and total bilirubin

Correlation between perforated appendicitis and total bilirubin

Aim: In this study, we aimed to examine to what extent total bilirubin (TB) measurements can help us in diagnosing perforatedappendicitis.Material and Methods: The TB levels of the patients for whom a surgery was planned with a preliminary diagnosis of appendicitis,were measured and then recorded. The patients with a TB level of 1.20 mg/dL and below were considered “normal”, and those with aTB value of 1.21 mg/dL and above were considered “high”. The appendectomy materials were divided into three groups, namely nonappendicitis,perforated appendicitis and non-perforated appendicitis, according to postoperative pathology report. The statisticalcorrelation between the postoperative pathological findings of appendectomy materials and the groups formed according to TBresults was analyzed.Results: Of the patients included in our study, 80 (46%) were female and 96 (54%) were male. The average age was 27.48±12.08years, and the median age was 25 years. As per the pathology report, 15 patients had no appendicitis (negative laparotomy), 2 (13%)of whom had a high TB level whereas 24 patients had perforated appendicitis, 8 (33%) of whom had a high TB level and 135 patientshad non-perforated appendicitis, 28 (21%) of whom had a high TB level.Conclusion: Our study found that the TB level in perforated appendicitis was 1.6 times higher than that in non-perforated appendicitisand 2.5 times higher than that in negative laparatomies. The bilirubin value differences between the groups were statisticallysignificant (p< 0.05).

___

  • 1. Prystowsky JB, Pugh CM, Nagle AP. Appendicitis. Curr Probl Surgery 2005;42:688-742.
  • 2. Coskun T, Kaya Y. Acute Appendicitis. Iskender Sayek. In: Basic Surgery. 4 Edition. 2013;114:1342-50.
  • 3. Tatli F, Ekici U, Kanlioz M, et al. Ultrasonosonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Ital Chir 2016;87:152- 4. 4. Kanlioz M, Ekici U, Tatli F, et al. Is there any relationship between complicated appendicitis and leucocyte counts. J Turgut Ozal Med Center 2016;23:125-5.
  • 5. Tatli F, Ekici U, Kanlioz M, et al. Effeciency of alvarado score in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Turgut Ozal Med Center 2016;23:152-5.
  • 6. Adams HL, Jaunoo SS. Hyperbilirubinaemia in appendicitis: the diagnostic value for prediction of appendicitis and appendiceal perforation. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2016;42:249-52.
  • 7. Sandstrom A, Grieve DA. Hyperbilirubinaemia: its utility in non-perforated appendicitis. ANZ J Surg 2017;87:587-90.
  • 8. McGowan DR, Sims HM, Zia K, et al. The value of biochemical markers in predicting a perforation in acute appendicitis. ANZ J Surg 2013;83:79-83.
  • 9. Bonadio W, Bruno S, Attaway D, et al. Lack of utility of measuring serum bilirubin concentration in distinguishing perforation status of pediatric appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35:885-8.
  • 10. Muller S, Falch C, Axt S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of hyperbilirubinaemia in anticipating appendicitis and its severity. Emerg Med J. 2015;32:698-702.
  • 11. Alanis-Rivera B, Zúñiga-Vázquez LA, Silva-Escamilla MC. Hyperbilirrubinemia as a predictive factor of perforated appendicitis. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2016;54:552- 61.
  • 12. Eren T, Tombalak E, Ozemir IA, et al. Hyperbilirubinemia as a predictive factor in acute appendicitis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2016;42:471-6.
  • 13. Käser SA, Fankhauser G, Willi N, et al. C-reactive protein is superior to bilirubin for anticipation of perforation in acute appendicitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010;45:885-92.
  • 14. Emmanuel A, Murchan P, Wilson I, et al. The value of hyperbilirubinaemia in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2011;93:213-7.
  • 15. Giordano S, Pääkkönen M, Salminen P, et al. Elevated serum bilirubin in assessing the likelihood of perforation in acute appendicitis: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2013;11:795-800.
  • 16. D'Souza N, Karim D, Sunthareswaran R. Bilirubin; a diagnostic marker for appendicitis.Int J Surg 2013;11:1114- 7.