Comparison of diagnostic scoring systems with imaging methods for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis

Comparison of diagnostic scoring systems with imaging methods for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis

Aim: Acute appendicitis scores have been developed to better analyze the symptoms and signs of acute appendicitis. In this study, wecompared the success rates of different scoring systems with imaging methods in the diagnostic confirmation of acute appendicitis.Materials and Methods: Patients aged above 18 years, who presented to the emergency department with right lower quadrant painand were suspected to have acute appendicitis, were prospectively and observationally evaluated. The demographic characteristics,imaging modalities, Alvarado score, acute inflammatory response score, and adult appendicitis score were assessed.Results: 237 patients, 46.8% female and 53.2% male, mean age of 34±13 (18-95) years. Appendectomy was performed in 144 (61%)patients with a prediagnosis of acute appendicitis. The pathological results were appendiceal cancer in two patients, lymphoidhyperplasia in 12, and acute appendicitis in 130. Imaging methods were found to be more specific than scores, and positive predictivevalues in scoring systems were more sensitive than imaging methods in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.Conclusion: There is still no effective and guiding scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Due to the low negativepredictive values of the available scoring systems, patients should be evaluated with detailed anamnesis, examination and laboratoryfindings, and computed tomography should be performed if there is clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis.

___

  • 1. Yesiltas M, Karakas DO, Gokcek B, et al. Can Alvarado and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response scores evaluate the severity of acute appendicitis? Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi. TJTES 2018;24:557-62.
  • 2. Shogilev DJ, Duus N, Odom SR, et al. Diagnosing appendicitis: evidence-based review of the diagnostic approach in 2014. West J Emerg Med 2014;15:859.
  • 3. De Castro S, Unlu C, Steller EP, et al. Evaluation of the appendicitis inflammatory response score for patients with acute appendicitis. World J Surg 2012;36:1540- 5.
  • 4. Altieri MS, Yang J, Nie L, et al. Incidence of cholecystectomy after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2018;14:992-6.
  • 5. Ohle R, O'Reilly F, O'Brien KK, et al.The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review. BMC Med 2011;9:139.
  • 6. Frountzas M, Stergios K, Kopsini D, et al. Alvarado or RIPASA score for diagnosis of acute appendicitis? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Int J Surg 2018;56:307-14.
  • 7. Maghrebi H, Maghraoui H, Makni A, et al. Role of the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Pan Afr Med J 2018;29:56.
  • 8. Sammalkorpi H, Mentula P, Savolainen H, et al. The introduction of Adult Appendicitis Score reduced negative appendectomy rate. Scand J Surg 2017;106:196-201.
  • 9. Karami MY, Niakan H, Zadebagheri N, et al. Which One is Better? Comparison of the Acute Inflammatory Response, Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis and Alvarado Scoring Systems. Ann Coloproctol 2017;33:227.
  • 10. Al-Khayal KA, Al-Omran MA. Computed tomography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of equivocal acute appendicitis. A meta-analysis. Saudi Med J 2007;28:173-80.
  • 11. Eng KA, Abadeh A, Ligocki C, et al. Acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, and MRI as second-line imaging tests after an initial US. Radiology 2018;288:717-27.
  • 12. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2078-86.
  • 13. do Nascimento RR, Souza JCG, Alexandre VB, et al. Association between the Alvarado score and surgical and histopathological findings in acute appendicitis. Rev Col Bras Cir 2018;45.
  • 14. Scott A, Mason S, Arunakirinathan M, et al. Risk stratification by the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response score to guide decision-making in patients with suspected appendicitis. Br J Surg 2015;102:563- 72.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: 12
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Divergent prevalence of Warthin tumor in Africa and Asia: A consequence of variation in smoking index?

Jude Ogechukwu OKOYE

Comparison of translucency and flexural strength of fiberreinforced composite resin materials

Nurcan ÖZAKAR İLDAY, Özcan KARATAŞ, Rabia BİLGİÇ, Pınar GÜL

Endovascular treatment of ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms within 24 hours: Clinical and angiographic results

Mehmet KOLU, İsmail Okan YILDIRIM, Kaya SARAÇ, Gulyara ÇİĞDEM, Osman DERE, Veysel KAYA

Evaluation of socio-demographic characteristics of people was determined to use synthetic cannabinoids in Malatya and its surrounding cities / districts and LC-MS/MS analysis method

Mücahit ORUÇ, Osman CELBİŞ, Bedirhan Sezer ÖNER, Semih PETEKKAYA, Özcan SOYLU, Ahmet Hakan DİNÇ

Association of Betatrophin, TNF-α and IL-6 with diabetic microvascular and macrovascular complications

Mehmet Ferit GÜRSU, Burkay YAKAR, Erhan ÖNALAN, Nevzat GOZEL, Elif MELEK

The role of serum Pro- and Anti-inflammatory cytokines as potential diagnostic markers for psoriasis

Gamze VAROL, Dumrul GÜLEN, Hülya ALBAYRAK, Gamze ERFAN, Berna ERDAL, Mine AYDIN KURC, Mehmet Emin YANIK

The potential gastrointestinal side effects of excipients in imatinib preparations

Aydan AKDENİZ, Nalan TİFTİK, Anıl TOMBAK, Eyip Naci TİFTİK, Gülhan OREKİCİ, Mehmet Ali UÇAR, Berrin BALIK, Mahmut Bakır KOYUNCU

Hematological parameters in pediatric patients with primary headache

Erhan AKSOY

Rupture of testicle accompanying multiple traumas: A case report

Hasan GÖKÇE, Şükrü GÜRBÜZ, Serdar DERYA, Muhammed EKMEKYAPAR, Muhammed Gökhan TURTAY, Ömer Faruk SOLGUN

Stigma in head and neck tuberculosis patients: Evaluation and analysis

İsmail AYTAÇ