Comparison of carcinoid tumors with the other tumors of appendix

Comparison of carcinoid tumors with the other tumors of appendix

Aim: Carcinoid tumor is the most frequent primary tumor of the appendix which may reach up to 60% of all appendiceal neoplasms.We aimed to evaluate the incidental appendiceal carcinoid tumors following acute appendicitis analyzing the demographics, clinical,laboratory, pathological features and follow-up results of the patients.Material and Methods: We evaluated the patients retrospectively who had been operated for acute appendicitis between January2006 and May 2018 .Results: We found 29 patients with carcinoid tumor among 7122 cases (0.4%) between 2006-2018. Median size of tumors was foundto be 7.5 mm (Min: 0.8, max: 20 mm). While appendectomy was sufficient for 27 of the patients, right hemicolectomy was performedfor 2 cases. When labaratory values were analysed the neutrophil / WBC ratio was significantly higher and lymphocyte count in thestudy group was significantly lower than control group (p < 0.05). The neutrophil / lymphocyte ratio was significantly higher thancontrol group (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Evaluation of laboratory values at admission, histopathological examination of appendiceal specimens, early diagnosisof cancer and performing the appropriate treatment are required for the survival of patients.

___

  • 1. Ariyarathenam AV, Nachimutu S, Tang TY, et al. Enterobius vermicularis infestation of the appendix and management at the time of laparoscopic appendectomy: case series and literature review. Int J Surg 2010;8:466-69.
  • 2. Wani I, Maqbool M, Amin A, et al. Appendiceal ascariasis in children. Ann Saudi Med 2010;30:63-6.
  • 3. Singh NG, Mannan AA, Kahvic M. Acute amebic appendicitis: report of a rare case. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2010;53:767- 68.
  • 4. Akbulut S, Tas M, Sogutcu N, et al. Unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: A retrospective analysis and literature review. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:1961-70.
  • 5. Agarwala N, Liu CY. Laparoscopic appendectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003;10:166-8.
  • 6. Tchana-Sato V, Detry O, Polus M, et al. Carcinoid tumor of appendix: a cosecutive series from 1237 appendectomies. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:6699-701.
  • 7. Sieren LM, Collins JN, Weireter LJ. et al. The incidence of benign and malignant neoplasia presenting as acute appendicitis. Am Surg 2010;76:808-11.
  • 8. Shapiro R, Eldar S, Sadot E, et al. The significance of occult carcinoids in the era of laparoscopic appendectomies. Surg Endosc 2010;24:2197-99.
  • 9. Ma KW, Chia NH, Yeung HW, et al. If not appendicitis, then what else can it be? A retrospective review of 1492 appendectomies. Hong Kong Med J 2010;16:12-7.
  • 10. Khan GM, Grillo IA, Abu-Eshy SA, et al. Pathology of the appendix. J Natl Med Assoc 2000;92:533-35.
  • 11. Hogan MJ. Appendiceal abscess drainage. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;6:205-14.
  • 12. Okafor PI, Orakwe JC, Chianakwana GU. Management of appendiceal masses in a peripheral hospital in Nigeria: review of thirty cases. World J Surg 2003;27:800-3.
  • 13. Senapathi PS, Bhattacharya D, Ammori BJ. Early laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicular mass. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1783-85.
  • 14. Tannoury J, Abboud B. Treatment options of inflammatory appendiceal masses in adults. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:3942-50.
  • 15. Bucher P, Mathe Z, Demirag A, et al. Appendix tumors in the era of laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 2004;18:1063-66.
  • 16. Duzgun AP, Moran M, Uzun S, et al. Unusual findings in appendectomy specimens: Evaluation of 2458 cases and review of the literature. Indian J Surg 2004;66:221-26.
  • 17. Willemsen PJ, Hoorntje LE, Eddes EH, et al. The need for interval appendectomy after resolution of an appendiceal mass questioned. Dig Surg 2002;19:216-20.
  • 18. Cakar E, Bayrak S, Bektas H, et al. Carcinoid tumor of the cecum presenting with acute appendicitis: A case report. Chirurgia 2015;110:171-74.
  • 19. Connor SJ, Hanna GB, Frizelle FA. Appendiceal tumors: retrospective clinicopathologic analysis of appendiceal tumors from 7970 appendectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:75-80.
  • 20. Emre A, Akubulut S, Bozdag Z, et al. Routine histopathologic examination of appendectomy specimens: Retrospective analysis of 1255 patients. Int Surg 2013;98:354-62.
  • 21. O’Hanlan KA, Fisher DT, O’Holleran MS. 257 incidental appendectomies during total laparoscopic hystrectomy. JSLS 2007;11:428-31.
  • 22. Machado NO, Chopra P, Pande G. Appendiceal tumourretrospective clinicopathological analysis. Trop Gastroenterol 2004;25:36-9.
  • 23. Jones AE, Phillips AW, Jarvis JR, et al. The value of routine histopathological examination of appendicectomy specimens. BMC Surg 2007;7:17.
  • 24. Hatzipantelis E, Panagopoulou P, Sidi-Fragandrea V, et al. Carcinoid tumors of appendix in children: experience from a tertiary center in northern Greece. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2010;51:622-25.
  • 25. Parker SE, Muir KR, al Sheyyab M, et al. Carcinoid tumors of the appendix in children 1957-1986: incidence, treatment and outcome. Br J Surg 1993;80:502-4.
  • 26. Goede AC, Caplin ME, Winslet MC. Carcinoid tumour of the appendix. Br J Surg 2003;90:1317-22.
  • 27. Modlin IM, Lye KD, Kidd M. A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors. Cancer 2003;97:934-59.
  • 28. Hermans JJ, Hermans AL, Risseeuw GA, et al. Appendicitis caused by carcinoid tumor. Radiology 1993;188:71-2.
  • 29. De Vita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA. Cancer of the endocrine system. In Cancer: principles and practice of oncology. 4th edition. Edited by morton AJ, Levin B, Jensen RT. Philadelphia: Lippincott Company; 1993;1371.
  • 30. Deans GT, Spence RA. Neoplastic lesions of the appendix. Br J Surg 1995;82:299-306.
  • 31. Blair NP, Bugis SP, Turner LJ, et al. Review of the pathologic diagnoses of 2, 216 appendectomy specimens. Am J Surg 1993;165:618-20.
  • 32. Roggo A, Wood WC, Ottinger LW. Carcinoid tumors ofthe appendix. Ann Surg 1993;217:385-90.
Annals of Medical Research-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: 12
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Assessment of patients’ psychosocial needs by surgeons

Sevinç MERSİN, Cemal GOKTAS

Claudin-5 (tight junction) expression level changes in achilles tendon healing

Soner CANKAYA, Derya ÇIRAKOĞLU, Alper CİRAKLİ, Havva ERDEM, Erdal UZUN

The effect of smoking cessation with or without bupropion on p wave duration and amplitude

Mert Ilker HAYİROGLU, Duygu ILKE YİLDİRİM, Mehmet Ali ERYILMAZ

Comparison of anterior segment parameters and corneal endothelial changes in patients with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation syndrome

Mahmut ATUM, Erel İÇEL, Yücel KARAKURT, Nurdan Gamze TASLI, Turgay UÇAK

Predictive value of CRP/albumin ratio for in-hospital atrial fibrillation development in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

Kamuran KALKAN

The predictivity of thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy varies depending on the radiologist experience: A retrospective cohort study

Bora BARUT, Bulent UNAL, Saadet ALAN, Yasin DALDA, Fatih GONULTAS, Koray KUTLUTURK

Comparison of different arm positions and angles with ultrasound for infraclavicular b

Evren BÜYÜKFIRAT, Orhan BİNİCİ

Evaluation of the quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate dental students

Fatih AKSOY, Uğur AYDIN

The relationship between P wave dispersion and left atrial volume index in patients with metabolic syndrome

Uğur AKSU

The comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy in women with abnormal uterine bleeding: A single center experience

Nefise Nazlı YENİGÜL, Fatma YAZICI YILMAZ, Neslihan BAHAT, Serpil KİRİM YİLMAZ