Mustafa CANBOLAT, Davut OZBAG, Deniz SENOL, Furkan CEVİRGEN

An anatomic overview to “manspreading” campaign

There is a campaign called “manspreading”. The campaign which started to draw attention to men’s making passengers uncomfortable by sitting with open legs in public transportation, attracted too much attention. When we glance through communal living spaces, we see men mostly sitting with their legs open. Can there be a morphological background of this sitting position? Basically, the pelvis of men and women are different from each other. Angulus subpubicus is bigger in women. In women, the femur head is located to lateral due to excess angulus subpubicus. However, the lower end of femur has to direct to medial toadjust with tibial condyle, that is, it gets closer to midline. Anteversion angle of acetabulum is higher in women. Anteversion with a higher angle means more anteriorly located acetabulum. That is, both femurs have to be more located to the midline. In women, the collodiaphyseal angle and femur neck length is smaller than men. Both of these situations cause femurs to be located close to the midline. Q angle which is used in the assessment of the mechanic and situation of knee joint is higher in women. High Q angle meansthat femur lower ends are close to the midline. Due to anatomical differences listed above, women’s femurs are located closer to the midline, while the femurs of men are located more laterally. This difference is also reflected in the way they sit.

PDF

___

Woodland LH, Francis RS. Parameters and comparisons of the quadriceps angle of college-aged men and women in the supine and standing positions. Am J Sports Med 1992; 20:208-11.
Conley S, Rosenberg A, Crowninshield R. The female knee: anatomic variations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007;1:S31-6.
Mihalko WM, Boachie-Adjei Y, Spang JT, et al. Controversies and techniques in the surgical management of patellofemoral arthritis. Instr Course Lect 2008;57:365-80.
Smith TO, Hunt NJ, Donell ST. The reliability and validity of the Q-angle: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:1068-79.
Hughston JC. Patellar subluxation. a recent history. Clinical Sports Medicine 1989;8:153-62.
Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the Musculoskeleteal System. Foundations for Physical Rehabilitation 1st ed. Mosby Inc; 2002 p: 477-522.
Genser-Strobl B, Sora MC. Potential of P40 plastination for morphometric hip measurements. Surg Radiol Anat 2005;27:147-51.
Nieves JW, Formica C, Ruffing J, et al. Males have larger skeletal size and bone mass than females, despite comparable body size. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20:529-35.
Nissen N, Hauge EM, Abrahamsen B, et al. Geometry of the proximal femur in relation to age and sex: a cross-sectional study in healthy adult Danes. Acta Radiol 2005;46:514-8.
Crabtree N, Lunt M, Holt G, et al. Hip geometry, bone mineral distribution, and bone strength in European men and women: the EPOS study. Bone 2000;27:151-9.
Levangie PK, Norkin CC. Joint Structure and Function. A Comprehensive Analysis. 4th ed. F.A Davis Company; 2005 p: 437-76.
Stem ES, O’Connor MI, Kransdorf MJ, Computed tomography analysis of acetabular anteversion and abduction. Skeletal Radiol 2006;35:385-9.
Wang SC, Brede C, Lange D, et al. Gender differences in hip anatomy: possible implications for injury tolerance in frontal collisions. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med 2004;48:287-301.
Nakahara I, Takao M, Sakai T, et al. Gender differences in 3D morphology and bony impingement of human hips. J Orthop Res 2011;29:333-9.
Maruyama M, Feinberg JR, Capello WN, et al.D’Antonio JA. The Frank Stinchfield Award: Morphologic Features of the Acetabulum and Femur: Anteversion Angle and Implant Positioning. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;393:52-65.
Slawski DP, Howard RF. Surgical management of refractory trochanteric bursitis. Am J Sports Med 1997;25:86-9.
Thomas Byrd JW. Gross anatomy. In: Thomas Byrd JW, editor. Operative Hip Arthroscopy, 2nd ed. New York: Springer Science Business Media, Inc; 2005. p.100-9.
Bird PA, Oakley SP, Shnier R, et al. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging and physical examination findings in patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44:2138-45.
Arifoğlu Y. Eklemler. In: Her Yönüyle Anatomi. 1st edition. İstanbul Tıp Kitabevi, İstanbul, 2016; 49-50.
Arıncı K, Elhan A. Alt Ekstremite Eklemleri. In: Anatomi 1. volume. 4th edition. Güneş Kitabevi, Ankara, 2006; 20-1.
Snell RS. Alt Ekstremite. In: Yıldırım M, ed. Snell Klinik Anatomi, 6th Edisyon. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri; 2004. p. 545-6.