A growing problem of methanol poisonings: A retrospective analysis of 47 patients in a single-center in Turkey

Aim: The present study was aimed to determine the epidemiological features, clinical signs, and risk factors of methanol poisonings in our region. As all countries, methanol poisoning continues to be a serious problem in Turkey. The epidemiology of methanol poisoning varies between countries, even between regions of the same country. It is important to evaluate the regional factors to decrease morbidity and mortality. Materials and Methods: This descriptive retrospective study was conducted in a regional tertiary hospital. The medical records of all methanol poisoning-related admissions to the emergency department between January 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Etiology of poisoning, demographic characteristics, laboratory results including methanol levels, administered treatments, and mortality were recorded. Results: 47 patients aged 18-67 years (mean 31.55±14,88 years) were included in the study. Thirty-nine (82.9%) of the patients were male and 8 (17.1%) of them were female. The vast majority of patients (n = 33, 70.3%) had nausea and vomiting. Twenty (42.5%) patients had blurred vision and 1 (2.1%) patient had blindness. Three (6.3%) patients were in a stupor and 4 (8.5%) were in a coma. The mortality rate of methanol poisonings was 12.7% (n=6). 28 (59.5%) patients survived without complications, whereas, 13 (27.6%) patients survived with a neurological sequel. Conclusions: Methanol poisoning is a serious problem among developing countries, where alcohol is not legal and cheap. High serum methanol levels are associated with a poor prognosis. Time spent from ingestion to treatment is critical to avoid complications and mortality, therefore clinicians should keep in mind methanol poisoning during differential diagnosis in such patients.

PDF

___

1. Chan AP, Chan TY. Methanol as an unlisted ingredient in supposedly alcohol-based hand rub can pose serious health risk. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:1440.
2. Slørdal L, Skogholt A, Aarstad K, et al. Methanol poisonings in 2007-08. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2010;130:146-8. .
3. Hantson PE. Acute methanol intoxication: physiopathology, prognosis and treatment. Bull Mem Acad R Med Belg 2006;161:425-34; discussion 34.
4. McKellar MJ, Hidajat RR, Elder MJ. Acute ocular methanol toxicity: clinical and electrophysiological features. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1997;25:225-30.
5. McMahon DM, Winstead S, Weant KA. Toxic alcohol ingestions: focus on ethylene glycol and methanol. Adv Emerg Nurs J 2009;31:206-13.
6. Paasma R, Hovda KE, Tikkerberi A, et al. Methanol mass poisoning in Estonia: outbreak in 154 patients. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2007;45:152-7.
7. Dawson AH, Whyte IM. Therapeutic drug monitoring in drug overdose. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999;48:278-83.
8. Gulen M, Satar S, Avci A, et al. Methanol poisoning in Turkey: Two outbreaks, a single center experience. Alcohol 2020;88:83-90.
9. Kalkan S, Cevik AA, Cavdar C, et al. Acute methanol poisonings reported to the Drug and Poison Information Center in Izmir, Turkey.Vet Hum Toxicol 2003;45:334-7.
10. Hassanian-Moghaddam H, Pajoumand A, Dadgar S, et al. Prognostic factors in methanol poisoning. Hum Exp Toxicol 2007;26:583-6.
11. Davis LE, Hudson D, Benson BE, et al. Methanol poisoning exposures in the United States: 1993–1998. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2002;40:499-505.
12. Hovda KE, Hunderi OH, TAFJORD AB, et al. Methanol outbreak in Norway 2002–2004: epidemiology, clinical features and prognostic signs. J Intern Med 2005;258:181-90.
13. Gonda A, Gault H, Churchill D, et al. Hemodialysis for methanol intoxication. Am J Med 1978;64:749-58.