Executive Remuneration of Company Directors under EU Law and Turkish Law

Executive Remuneration of Company Directors under EU Law and Turkish Law

The criteria to determine the material scope of executive pay has always been a controversial aspect of corporate law and corporate governance. The controversy stems from the fact that the board of directors generally tends to determine a suitable executive remuneration for its members, not considering the interests of other stakeholders. In some cases, an independent compensation/remuneration committee is appointed by the board of directors and determines the amount of executive pay. Depending on the legislation, this may require additional approval at the annual general meeting by the shareholders. European legislators have differing approaches with regards to regulating this very area of corporate pay. The revised Shareholders Rights Directive requires an enhanced approach for the shareholders’ role by determining the remuneration policy of the company. These amendments can be identified as the promotion of the say on pay, on the remuneration policy, and remuneration report. Furthermore, the previous recommendations have also set the criteria to determine the amount of remuneration. The Directive contains provisions for setting up a clear and transparent corporate remuneration policy and shareholders’ binding vote with temporary derogations. The corporate remuneration system of Turkish law is legislated under Art. 394 TCC (Turkish Commercial Code Nr. 6102), which only requires that board members can be paid an honorarium, salary, bonus, premium, and a portion of the annual profit, provided that this amount is determined by the articles of association, or by way of a general meeting resolution. Art. 408 TCC also stipulates a binding general meeting approval of the remuneration policy, whereas Art. 513 TCC requires the framework with regard to bankruptcy procedures.

___

  • Armour J, Enriques L and et. al. The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach (3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2017). google scholar
  • Arslanlı H, Anonim Şirketler C.II-III (Fakülteler Matbaası 1960). google scholar
  • Badak Z, Türk Ticaret Kanunu’na Göre Anonim Şirkette Pay Sahibinin Kar Payı Hakkı (On İki Levha, 2018). google scholar
  • Birsel M. T, Anonim Şirketler Hukukunda Kâr Kavramı Ciltl (Ege Üniversitesi Matbaası 1973). google scholar
  • Domaniç H, Anonim Şirketler (Eğitim Yayınları, 1978). google scholar
  • Ferrarini G, Moloney N and Ungureanu M C, ‘Understanding Directors’ Pay in Europe: A Comparative and Empirical Analysis’ (2009) SSRN ECGI - Law Working Paper 126/2009, 5 accessed 10 April 2023. google scholar
  • Ferrarini G and Ungureanu M C, in J. Gordon and G. Ringe (eds) ‘Executive Remuneration. A Comparative Overview’ (2014) Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press, European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) - Law Working Paper 268/2014) 5 < https://ssrn.com/abstract=2509968 >, accessed 10 April 2023. google scholar
  • Georgiev M and Kolev M, ‘Die überarbeitete Aktionärsrechterichtlinie (RL 2017/828/EU): Mehr Rechte und erhöhte Transparenz für die Aktionäre’ (2018) GWR 107. google scholar
  • Gordon J N, ‘What Enron Means for the Management and Control of the Modern Business Commission’s Proposal Corporation: Some Initial Reflections’ (2002) 69 University of Chicago Law Review 1233-1250. google scholar
  • Habersack M, ‘Vorstands- und Aufsichtsratsvergütung - Grundsatz- und Anwendungsfragen im Lichte der Aktionärsrechterichtlinie’ (2018) (127) NZG 129. google scholar
  • İmregün O, Kara Ticaret Hukuku Dersleri (Filiz Kitabevi 1996). google scholar
  • Kendigelen A, Yeni Türk Ticaret Kanunu, Değişiklikler Yenilikler ve İlk Tespitler (3rd edn., On İki Levha 2016). google scholar
  • Kubilay H, ‘Anonim Ortaklıkta Yönetim Kurulu Üyelerinin Ücretlerinin Belirlenmesi’ in Ticaret Hukuku ve Yargıtay Kararları Sempozyumu XXIV(2010) BTHAE 9-76. google scholar
  • Manavgat Ç, Kırca İ and Şehirali Çelik F. H, Anonim Şirketler Hukuku C. 1 (BTHAE 2013). google scholar
  • Masouros, P E, ‘Is the EU Taking Shareholder Rights Seriously? An Essay on the Impotence of Shareholdership in Corporate Europe’ (2010) 7(5) European Company Law 195-203. google scholar
  • Nijland j and Dijkhuizen T C A, ‘Say on Pay and Focus on Sustainability of Companies: A Revised Shareholders’ Rights Directive’ (2017) 14 (5) European Company Law Journal 188-189. google scholar
  • Özer I, Anonim Şirket Yöneticilerinin Mali Haklar (Adalet Yayınevi 2013). google scholar
  • Poroy R, Tekinalp Ü and Çamoğlu E, Ortaklıklar Hukuku-I (15th edn., Vedat Kitapçılık 2021). google scholar
  • Pulaşlı H, Şirketler Hukuku Şerhi, C.II, (4th edn., Adalet Yayınevi, 2022). google scholar
  • Robé J P ‘The Shareholders Rights Directive II’ in ERA Forum 17 (2016) 45-55. google scholar
  • Sarıkaya S, in Kemal Şenpolat (eds) Şirketler Hukuku Şerhi C.III (Seçkin Yayıncılık 2023) Art.511, 3301-3317. google scholar
  • Sayılgan G and Şenocak K, in Kemal Şenocak (eds) Şirketler Hukuku Şerhi C.III (Seçkin Yayıncılık 2023) Art.516, 3396-3440. google scholar
  • Songur D, in Kemal Şenocak (eds) Şirketler Hukuku Şerhi C.II (Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2023) Art. 394, 2123-2139. google scholar
  • Tarde A, ‘Die verschleierte Konzernrichtlinie, zu den neuen EU-Vorgaben für related party transactions und ihren Auswirkungen auf das deutsche Recht’ (2017) 46 (3) Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht 360-388. google scholar
  • Tekinalp Ü, Sermaye Ortaklıklarının Yeni Hukuku (5th edn., Vedat Kitapçılık 2020). google scholar
  • Tekinalp Ü, Anonim Ortaklığın Bilançosu ve Yedek Akçeler (Fakülteler Matbaası 1979. google scholar
  • Van der Elst C, ‘Shareholders: Holding the Reins of Remuneration: The European Say on Pay’ (2017) 14 (3) European Company Law Journal 114-120. google scholar
  • Ventoruzzo M, Conac P-H and et. al., Comparative Corporate Law (West Academic Publishing 2015). google scholar
  • Yanlı V ‘Yönetim Kurulu Üyelerinin Kazanç Payı ile İlgili Bazı Sorunlar’ (2019) 8 (32) Banka ve Finans Hukuku Dergisi 1155-1176. google scholar