Concept of Legal Aid in Civil Litigation in Accordance with the Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights

Concept of Legal Aid in Civil Litigation in Accordance with the Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights

Access to a fair trial is a fundamental human right that has been addressed both in international law and in the context of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Legal aid (free or affordable legal support/assistance/service) is evaluated as one of the elements of a fair trial. The well-known sixth article of the ECHR refers directly to legal aid. However, the third paragraph of ECHR art. 6 issues only criminal offenses. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) implies the right to free legal assistance (legal aid) in civil cases. In our study, we will focus on the term of legal aid, types of legal aid and main legal aid systems, features of legal aid in civil matters, subject of legal aid and litigation costs and the procedure of legal aid application and who will be granted by legal aid in civil litigation.

___

  • Bolan J, ‘Civil Legal Aid and Global Access to Justice’, (2012) 6 Toronto Associations of Law Libraries 5. google scholar
  • Dickson G, ‘Legal Aid Breakthrough’, (1999) 24:3 LawNow 52. google scholar
  • Durbach A, ‘The Right to Legal Aid in Social Rights Litigation’, In M. Langford (Ed), Social Rights Jurisprudence - Emerging Trends In International And Comparative Law, (59 Cambridge University Press 2008). google scholar
  • Galowitz P, ‘Litigating Economics Social and Cultural Rights: Legal Practitioner’s Dossier’, Centre on Housing Rights & Evictions, ‘Right to Legal Aid and Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Litigation’ (2006), http://www.right-to-education.org/ resource/litigating-economic-social-cultural-rights-legal-practitioners-dossier accessed 10 November 2022 41. google scholar
  • Jüriloo K, ‘Free Legal Aid - a Human Right’, (2015) 33:3 Nordic Journal of Human Rights 204. google scholar
  • Kılınç A, Medeni Usul Hukukunda Adli Yardım, (Ankara: Adalet Yayınevi 2013) google scholar
  • Model Law on Legal Aid in Criminal Justice Systems with Commentaries, United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime, (United Nations, March 2017). google scholar
  • Pekcanıtez H, Medeni Yargıda Adil Yargılanma, (1997) 2 İzmir Barosu Dergisi 35. google scholar
  • Rhode D, ‘Access to Justice: Connecting Principles to Practice’, (2004) 17 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, https://heinonline.org/ accessed 25 November 2022 369. google scholar
  • Smith R, ‘International and Legal Aid’, Türkiye’de Adli Yardım: Karşılaştırmalı İnceleme ve Politikalar Yuvarlak Masa Toplantısı (16 Nisan 2004), İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları 90, İnsan Hakları Hukuku Çalışmaları 3, (İstanbul, Şubat 2005) 140. google scholar
  • Stamps L. N, ‘Equal Justice Under Law: The English Approach’ (1952) 20 University of MissouriKansas City Law Review, https://heinonline.org/ accessed 20 October 2022 49. google scholar
  • Tanrıver S, ‘Hukuk Yargısı (Medenî Yargı) Bağlamında Adil Yargılanma Hakkı’, (2004) 53 Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi 191. google scholar
  • Özekes M, Medeni Usul Hukukunda Hukuki Dinlenilme Hakkı, (Ankara Yetkin Yayınevi, 2003). google scholar
  • ECtHR Decisions and Judgements google scholar
  • Commission decisions of ECtHR google scholar
  • Munro v. United Kingdom, Application no 10594/83, 14 July 1987 google scholar
  • Thaw v. United Kingdom, Application No 27435/95, 26 June 1996 google scholar
  • Wolff v. Switzerland, Application no 31983/96, Commission admissibility decision of 24 May 1991 Judgments of ECtHR google scholar
  • Aerts v Belgium, Application no 25357/94, 30 July 1998 google scholar
  • Airey v. Ireland, Application No 6289/73, 9 October 1979 google scholar
  • Bakan v. Turkey, Application No 50939/99, 12 June 2007 google scholar
  • Biba v. Greece, Application no 33170/96, 26 September 2000 google scholar
  • Debeffe v. Belgium, Application no 64612/01, 9 July 2002 google scholar
  • Golder v. United Kingdom, Application no 4451/70, 21 February 1975 google scholar
  • McVicar v United Kingdom, Application no 46311/99, 7 May 2002 google scholar
  • P, C & S v. United Kingdom, Application no 56547/00, 4 October 2003 google scholar
  • Quaranta v. Switzerland, Application no 12744/87, 24 May 1991 google scholar
  • Santambroggio v. Italy, Application no 50939/99, 21 June 2004 google scholar
  • Steel and Morris v United Kingdom, Application no. 68416/01, 15 February 2005 google scholar
  • Tunc v Turkey, Application no 20400/03, 21 February 2008 google scholar