GENİTOÜRİNER SİSTEM ÖRNEKLERİNDE ÜREYEN UREAPLASMA UREALYTICUM VE MYCOPLASMA HOMINIS KÖKENLERİNİN İN VİTRO ANTİBİYOTİKLERE DUYARLILIKLARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Genitoüriner sistem (GÜS) infeksiyon etkenlerinden olan Ureaplasma urealyticum ve Mycoplasma hominis prevalansı sosyoekonomik durumla ilişkilidir. Bu mikroorganizmaların antibiyotik duyarlılık profilleri bölgesel değişiklik göstermektedir. Çalışmamızda GÜS infeksiyonu şüphesi ile laboratuvarımıza gönderilmiş olan çeşitli GÜS örneklerinde U.urealyticum ve M.hominis sıklığının ve antibiyotik duyarlılık oranlarının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır.U.urealyticum ve/veya M.hominis infeksiyonu şüphesi ile laboratuvarımıza gönderilmiş olan 3410 hastanın idrar, vajinal akıntı, servikal sürüntü, semen ve üretral akıntıdan oluşan GÜS örnekleri, retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmiştir. U.urealyticum ve/veya M.hominis üremesinin tanımlanmasında ve antibiyotik duyarlılık testlerinde Mycoplasma IES (AutobioDiagnostics, Çin) kiti kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar CLSI kriterlerine göre duyarlı, orta duyarlı ve dirençli olarak kategorize edilmiştir.Değerlendirilen örneklerin % 22.2'sinde U.urealyticum, % 2.9'unda U.urealyticum ve M.hominis koenfeksiyonu ve % 0.2'sinde M.hominis üremesi saptanmıştır. Duyarlılık oranlarının en yüksek olduğu antibiyotikler, U.urealyticum için minosiklin (% 98.5), doksisiklin (% 98.1) ve josamisin (% 98.1); M.hominis için doksisiklin (% 96.2), minosiklin (% 94.3) ve josamisin (% 88.7) olarak belirlenmiştir. Verilerimiz incelenen hasta grubunda U.urealyticum'un M.hominis'e göre belirgin olarak daha sık saptandığına, üremelerin 20-29 yaş aralığında ve kadınlarda daha sık (p=0.034) görüldüğüne, minosiklin ve doksisiklin duyarlılık oranlarının her iki bakteri için de oldukça yüksek olduğuna işaret etmektedir

Evaluation of In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis Strains Isolated from Genitourinary Tract Samples

Prevalence of genitourinary tract infections caused by Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis are related to sociodemographic status. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of these microorganisms vary regionally. In our study, it is aimed to determine frequency of U.urealyticum and M.hominis in genitourinary tract samples collected from patients with suspicion of genitourinary tract infection and, their antimicrobial susceptibility ratios. Genitourinary tract samples consisting of urine, vaginal discharge, cervical swab, semen and urethral discharge obtained from 3410 patients suspected with genitourinary infection caused by U.urealyticum and/or M.hominis were evaluated retrospectively. Mycoplasma IES commercial kit (AutobioDiagnostics, China) was used for identification and, antimicrobial susceptibility testing of U.urealyticum and/or M.hominis. Susceptibility test results were categorized as susceptible, intermediate or resistant according to CLSI criteria. While U.urealyticum, and M.hominis was detected from 22.2 % and 0.2 % of the samples respectively; co-infection was detected in 2.9 %. The most effective antimicrobials against both U.urealyticum and M.hominis were minocycline (98.5 % and 94.3 %), doxycycline (98.1 % and 96.2 %) and josamycin (98.1 % and 88.7 %). Our results indicate that U.urealyticum was clearly more frequent than M.hominis, positive culture results were more common in 20-29 years and females (p=0.034), and minocycline and doxycycline susceptibility ratios were considerably high against both microorganisms.

___

  • 1. Afacan G, Yumuk Z, Yılmaz NÖ ve ark. Steril pyürili hastalarda Mycoplasma hominis ve Ureaplasma urealyticum prevalansı ve antibiyotik duyarlılık, ANKEM Derg 2007; 21(4):232-6.
  • 2. Ahmadi MH, Mirsalehian A, Bahador A. Prevalence of urogenital mycoplasmas in Iran and their effects on fertility potential: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Iran J Public Health 2016;45(4):409.
  • 3. Bayraktar MR, Özerol IH, Güçlüer N et al. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in pregnant women, Int J Infect Dis 2010; 14(2):e90-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2009.03.020
  • 4. Capoccia R, Greub G, Baud D. Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis and adverse pregnancy outcomes, Curr Opin Infect Dis 2013;26(3): 231-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0b013e328360db58
  • 5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing for human mycoplasmas; approved guideline, CLSI Document M43-A, CLSI, Wayne, 2011.
  • 6. Díaz L, Cabrera LE, Fernández T et al. Frequency and antimicrobial sensitivity of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in patients with vaginal discharge, MEDICC Rev 2013;15(4): 45-7.
  • 7. Donders GG, Ruban K, Bellen G et al. Mycoplasma/Ureaplasma infection in pregnancy: to screen or not to screen, J Perinat Med 2017;45(5):1-11 . https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2016-0111
  • 8. Ekşi F, Balcı BA, Bayrak İS ve ark. Servisitli kadınların endoservikal sürüntü örneklerinde Mycoplasma hominis ve Ureaplasma urealyticum araştırılması, Fırat Tıp Derg 2006;11(4):193-6.
  • 9. Esen B, Gozalan A, Sevindi DF et al. Ureaplasma urealyticum: the presence among sexually transmitted diseases, Jpn J Infect Dis 2017; 70(1):75-9. https://doi.org/10.7883/yoken.JJID.2015.258
  • 10. Frølund M, Lidbrink P, Wikström A et al. Urethritisassociated pathogens in urine from men with nongonococcal urethritis: a case-control study, Acta Derm Venereol 2016; 96(5): 689-95. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-2314
  • 11. Hartmann M. Genital mycoplasmas, J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2009;7(4):371-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1610-0387.2008.06965.x
  • 12. Huang C, Long X, Jing S et al. Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis, World J Urol 2016;34(7):1039-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1724-z
  • 13. Kechagia N, Bersimis S, Chatzipanagiotou S. Incidence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of genital mycoplasmas in outpatient women with clinical vaginitis in Athens, Greece, J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;62(1):122-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkn158
  • 14. Larsen B, Hwang J. Mycoplasma, Ureaplasma, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a fresh look, Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2010; 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/521921
  • 15. Leli C, Mencacci A, Bombaci JC et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in a population of Italian and immigrant outpatients, Infez Med 2012;20(2):82-7.
  • 16. Meral T, Altun HU, Arıbaş ET. Bir üniversite hastanesinde Mycoplasma hominis ve Ureaplasma urealyticum prevalansı ve antibiyotik direnç profili, ANKEM Derg 2014;28(4):124-8.
  • 17. Mihai M, Valentin N, Bogdan D et al. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum isolated during a population-based study concerning women infertility in northeast Romania, Braz J Microbiol 2011;42(1):256-60. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822011000100032
  • 18. Novosad SA, Basavaraju SV, Annambhotla P et al. Mycoplasma hominis infections transmitted through amniotic tissue product, Clin Infect Dis 2017; cix507(Epub ahead of print). https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix507
  • 19. Pereyre S, Gonzalez P, De Barbeyrac B et al. Mutations in 23S rRNA account for intrinsic resistance to macrolides in Mycoplasma hominis and Mycoplasma fermentans and for acquired resistance to macrolides in M.hominis, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002;46(10):3142-50. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.46.10.3142-3150.2002
  • 20. Rerambiah LK, Ndong JC, Medzegue S et al. Genital Mycoplasma infections and their resistance phenotypes in an African setting, Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2015;34(6):1087-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2326-9
  • 21. Schneider SC, Tinguely R, Droz S et al. Antibiotic susceptibility and sequence type distribution of Ureaplasma species isolated from genital samples in Switzerland, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015;59(10):6026-31. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00895-15
  • 22. Selek MB, Bektöre B, Atik TK et al. Investigating the presence of Mycoplasma hominis-Ureaplasma urealyticum and in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities in patients with sterile pyuria, J Turgut Ozal Med Cent 2014;21(4):286-90.
  • 23. Skiljevic D, Mirkov D, Vukicevic J. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in genital samples collected over 6 years at a Serbian university hospital, Indian J Dermatol 2016;82(1):37. https://doi.org/10.4103/0378-6323.172903
  • 24. Taylor-Robinson D. Mollicutes in vaginal microbiology: Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Ureaplasma parvum and Mycoplasma genitalium, Res Microbiol 2017; pii:S0923- 2508(17)30044-X (Epub ahead of print).
  • 25. Tibaldi C, Cappello N, Latino MA et al. Vaginal and endocervical microorganisms in symptomatic and asymptomatic non-pregnant females: risk factors and rates of occurrence, Clin Microbiol Infect 2009;15(7):670-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02842.x
  • 26. Turan H, Özçimen EE, Arslan H. Vajinitli kadınlarda Mycoplasma hominis ve Ureaplasma urealyticum sıklığı ve antimikrobiyal duyarlılığı, ANKEM Derg 2011;25(1):17-21. https://doi.org/10.5222/ankem.2011.17
  • 27. Volgmann T, Ohlinger R, Panzig B. Ureaplasma urealyticum–harmless commensal or underestimated enemy of human reproduction? A review, Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005; 273(3):133-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0030-1
  • 28. Waites KB, Katz B, Schelonka RL. Mycoplasmas and ureaplasmas as neonatal pathogens, Clin Microbiol Rev 2005;18(4):757-89. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.18.4.757-789.2005
  • 29. Wang QY, Li RH, Zheng LQ et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in female outpatients, 2009-2013, J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2016;49(3):359-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2014.06.007
  • 30. Ye G, Jiang Z, Wang M et al. The resistance analysis of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in female reproductive tract specimens, Cell Biochem Biophys 2014;68(1):207-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-013-9691-8
  • 31. Zhang N, Wang R, Li X et al. Are Ureaplasma spp. a cause of nongonococcal urethritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis, PLoS One 2014;9(12): e113771. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113771
  • 32. Zeng XY, Xin N, Tong XN et al. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in Xi’an, China, Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2016;35(12):1941-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-016-2745-2
ANKEM Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1301-3114
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1986
  • Yayıncı: Antibiyotik ve Kemoterapi Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

GENİŞLEMİŞ SPEKTRUMLU BETA-LAKTAMAZ POZİTİF ESCHERICHIA COLI İLE OLUŞAN KOMPLİKE OLMAYAN ÜRİNER SİSTEM İNFEKSİYONLARININ TEDAVİSİNDE ORAL ANTİBİYOTİKLER KARBAPENEMLERE ALTERNATİF OLABİLİR Mİ?

YEŞİM ALPAY, MEHMET TEVFİK YAVUZ, TURAN ASLAN, Batıhan BÜYÜKZENGİN

İSTANBUL AMERİKAN HASTANESİ’NE BAŞVURAN GASTROENTERİTLİ ÇOCUKLARDA ADENOVİRUS, NOROVİRUS VE ROTAVİRUS SIKLIĞI

Sinan Mahir KAYIRAN, Tuğba GÜRSOY, Erhan PALAOĞLU, Berkan GÜRAKAN

ALT SOLUNUM YOLU ÖRNEKLERİNDEN İZOLE EDİLEN PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA SUŞLARININ ANTİBİYOTİK DUYARLILIĞI

Yeşim ÖZTÜRK BAKAR, Nevriye GÖNÜLLÜ, Seher AKKUŞ, Münevver SADUNOĞLU GÜLER, Gökhan AYGÜN

GENİTOÜRİNER SİSTEM ÖRNEKLERİNDE ÜREYEN UREAPLASMA UREALYTICUM VE MYCOPLASMA HOMINIS KÖKENLERİNİN İN VİTRO ANTİBİYOTİKLERE DUYARLILIKLARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Yeşim BEŞLİ, Onur KARATUNA, Işın AKYAR

ERİŞKİNLERDE ACİL ENFEKSİYON HASTALIKLARI

Recep ÖZTÜRK

Değerli Meslektaşlarımız, Sevgili Ankemistler,

Mustafa HACIMUSTAFAOĞLU, Derya AYDIN

2015-2017 YILLARI ARASINDA İZOLE EDİLEN CITROBACTER SUŞLARINDA ANTİBİYOTİK DİRENCİ

SELAHATTİN ATMACA, TUNCER ÖZEKİNCİ, SALİM YAKUT, NEZAHAT AKPOLAT, Kadri GÜL

ANTİBİYOTİK ARAYIŞINDA FOTOANTİMİKROBİYALLER VE FOTODİNAMİK ANTİMİKROBİYAL TEDAVİ

Gülay BÖREKÇİ, Elif A ERDOĞAN ELİUZ

TÜBERKÜLOZİS KUTİS VERRÜKOZA OLGUSUNDA NADİR BİR ETKEN: MYCOBACTERIUM CAPRAE

Meltem IŞIKGÖZ TAŞBAKAN, ALPER UYSAL, HÜSNÜ PULLUKÇU, CENGİZ ÇAVUŞOĞLU, MEHMET SEZAİ TAŞBAKAN, TANSU YAMAZHAN