İdrar N-asetil-beta-D-glukosaminidaz aktivitesi: İki farklı tayin yönteminin karşılaştırılması

Amaç: Lizozomal bir enzim olan N-asetil-beta-D-glukozaminidaz (NAG), renal tübüler hasarın er- ken belirleyicilerinden biridir. Bu çalışmada NAG aktivitesinin ölçümünde kullanılabilecek güvenlive kolayca uygulanabilir bir yöntemin belirlenmesi için p nitrophenyl N acetyl-B-D-glucosaminide(PNP-NAG) ve m, cresolsulfon phtaleinyl N, B, D glucosaminide (MCP-NAG) gibi kolorimetrik de- ğerlendirme imkanı veren iki farklı substrat kullanılarak yöntemlerin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır.Yöntem: Bu çalışmada 40 sağlıklı ve 40 böbrek yetmezliği olan hasta idrarındaki NAG aktiviteleriPNP-NAG ve MCP-NAG substratları ile ölçülerek, sonuçlar karşılaştırıldı. PNP NAG substratı ile çalışır- ken örnekler jel filtrasyonundan önce ve sonra reaksiyona sokularak jel filtrasyonunun sonuçları neşekilde etkilediği test edildi.Bulgular: PNP-NAG (jel +), PNP-NAG (jel -) ve MCP-NAG yöntemleri ile elde edilen sonuçlar orta- lama olarak sırasıyla, hasta grubunda sırasıyla (27.5 U/L, 25.96 U/L ve 16.5 U/L) kontrol grubunasırasıyla (5.66 U/L, 5.38U/L ve 3.62 U/L) olup; değerler hasta grubunda kontrol grubuna göre yüksekbulunmuştur (p

Comperative study of determination of urinary N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase activity

Aim: One of lyzozomal enzymes N-Acetyl-Beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), is a sensitive parameterof renal tubular injury. In order to to determine a confidential and easily applicable method we haveplan to measure and compare the results of NAG activities with two different substrates namelyp-nitrophenyl-N-acetyl-B-D-glucosaminide (PNP-NAG) and m-cresolsulfon-phtaleinyl-N-B-D-glu- cosaminide (MCP-NAG) .Material-Methods: We measured urinary NAG levels using PNP-NAG and MCP-NAG substrates in40 healty persons, and in 40 renal failure patients. We also tested the effect of gel filtration on PNP- NAG method.Results: The urinary NAG levels measured by two different substrates were 27.5 u/L and 16.5 u/Lin chronic renal failure group, 5.66 U/L and 3.62 U/L in control group. The differences between twogroups were significant (p

___

  • Wellwood JM, Ellis BG, Price RG, et al . Urinary N-acetyl- beta-D-glucosaminidase activities in patients with renal disease. Br Med J. 1975; 3(5980):408-11.
  • Conchic J , Vindlay J, Levvy AG. Mamma- lian glycosidases: Distribution in the body. Biochem J 1959 ;77:318-325
  • Bourbouze R, Baumann FC, Bonvalet JP, et al. Distribution of N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosa- minidase isoenzymes along the rabbit neph- ron. Kidney Int. 1984; 4:636-42
  • Etherington C, Bosomworth M, Clifton I, et al. Measurement of urinary N-acetyl-b-D- glucosaminidase in adult patients with cystic fibrosis: before, during and after treatment with intravenous antibiotics. J Cyst Fibros. Moriguchi J, Inoue Y, Kamiyama S, et al. N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) as the most sensitive marker of tubular dys- function for monitoring residents in non- polluted areas. Toxicol Lett. 2009;190(1):1- 8.
  • Jung K, Schulze BD, Sydow K. Diagnostic significance of different urinary enzymes in patients suffering from chronic renal diseas- es. Clin Chim Acta. 1987 ;1683:287-95.
  • Sherman RL, Drayer DE, Leyland-Jones BR, Reidenberg MM. N-acetyl-beta-glu- cosaminidase and beta 2-microglobulin. Their urinary excretion in patients with re- nal parenchymal disease. Arch Intern Med. 1983;143(6):1183-5.
  • Kang HK, Kim DK, Lee BH, et al Uri- nary N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase and malondialdehyde as a markers of renal dam- age in burned patients. J Korean Med Sci. 2001;16(5):598-602.
  • Kind PR. N-Acetyl-beta-D-glucosamini- dase in urine of patients with renal disease, and after renal transplants and surgery. Clin Chim Acta. 1982 ;119(1-2):89-97.
  • Sandman R, Margules RM, Kountz SL. Urinary lysosomal glycosidases after renal al- lotransplantation: Correlation of enzyme ex- cretion with allograft rejection and ischemia. Clin Chim Acta.1973;45(4):349-59.
  • Goren MP, Wright RK, Osborne S. Two automated procedures for N-acetyl-beta-D- glucosaminidase determination evaluated for detection of drug-induced tubular neph- rotoxicity. Clin Chem. 1986;32(11):2052-5.
  • Meyer BR, Fischbein A, Rosenman K, et al. Increased urinary enzyme excretion in work- ers exposed to nephrotoxic chemicals. Am J Med. 1984;76(6):989-98.
  • Etherington C, Bosomworth M, Clifton I , et al. Measurment of urinary N-Acetyl-beta- D-glucosaminidase in adult patients with cyctic fibrosis: Before, during and after treat- ment with intravenous antibiotics. Journal of Cyctic Fibrosis 2007; 6: 67-73
  • Mariguchi J, Inoue Y, Kamiyama S, et al. N-Acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase(NAG) as the most sensitive marker of tubuler dys- function for monitoring residents in non- polluted areas. Toxicology letters 2009; 190:1-8
  • Johnston ID, Jones NF, Scoble JE, et al. The diagnostic value of urinary enzyme measure- ments in hypertension. Clin Chim Acta. 1983;133(3):317-25.
  • Severini G, Aliberti LM, Di Girolamo M. N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase isoenzymes in serum and urine of patients with diabetes mellitus Clin Chem. 1988;34(12):2430- 2432
  • National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Management of type 2 diabetes. Renal dis- ease-prevention and early menagement clini- cal guideline. F. London : Natioanal Institute for Clinical Excellence 2002.
  • Basturk T, Altuntaş Y, Kurklu A, ve ark. Urinary N-Acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase as an earlier marker of diabetic nephropa- thy and influence of low-dose perindopril/ indapamide combination. Ren Fail 2006; 28(2):125-8
  • Ellis BG, Tucker SM, Thompson AE, et al. Presence of serum and tissue forms of N- acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase in urine from patients with renal disease. Clin Chim Acta. 1975; 64(2):195-202.
  • Kunin C M, Chesny R W, Craig W A, et al. Enzymuria as a glucosaminidase in the gen- eral population and in patients with renal disease . Pediatrics 1987; 62:751-760
  • Vigano A, Cavanna G, Capodaglio P, et al. Methodological and clinical aspects of uri- nary N-acetyl-glucosaminidase in pediatric subjects. Biochem Med. 1981;25(1):26-33.
  • Horak E, Hopfer SM, Sunderman FW Jr. Spectrophotometric assay for urinary N- acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase activity.Clin Chem.198; 27(7):1180-5.
  • Noto A, Ogawa Y, Mori S, et al. Simple, rap- id spectrophotometry of urinary N-acetyl- beta-D-glucosaminidase, with use of a new chromogenic substrate. Clin Chem. 1983; 29(10):1713-6.
  • Yuen CT, Price RG, Chattagoon L, et al. Colorimetric assays for N-acetyl-beta-D- glucosaminidase and beta-D-galactosidase in human urine using newly-developed omega-nitrostyryl substrates. Clin Chim Acta. 1982; 124(2):195-204.
  • Tassi C, Mancuso F, Feligioni L, et al. Ex- pression models of urinary N-Acetyl--D- glucosaminidase in patients with chronic renal insufficiancy. Clin Chim Acta 2004; 346:129-133
  • Welwood JM, Price RG, Ellis BG, et al. A note on the practical aspects of the assay of N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase. Clin Chim Acta 1976; 69:85-91
  • Muller D, Sievers E, Eggert P. Influence of hyperfiltration on the measurment of uri- nary NAG Pediatr. Nephrol. 1999; 13:519- 23
  • Lockwood TD, Bosmann HB: the use of urinary N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase in human renal toxicology 1. partial Biochemi- cal characterisation and excretion in hu- mans and release from the isolated perfused rat kidney. Toxicol and App Pharm. 1979; 49:323-336
  • Bauer JD Clinical Laboratory Methods 9th edition, St Louisse Missouri.C.V. Mossby Company; 1982 p:3-18
  • Cooper EH, Forbes MA. Evaluation of a new test for N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosamini- dase in urine. Clin Chem. 1984; 30(4):593- 4.
  • Shimojo N, Kitahashi S, Naka K, et al. Com- parison of N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase and alanine aminopeptidase activities for evaluation of microangiopathy in diabetes mellitus. Metabolism 1987; 36(3):277-8
Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 1947
  • Yayıncı: Erkan Mor
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Scrotal calcinosis: A Case report and review of literature

Saba KİREMİTCİ, Seher YÜKSEL, Kadri ANAFARTA, Özden TULUNAY

Beslenme ve diyet kliniğine başvuranlarda obezite durumu ve etkili faktörlerin belirlenmesi

Aliye ÇAYIR, Serdal Kenan KÖSE, Nazlı ATAK

Reconsidering Darfur conflict as a case study for comp emergencies with public health impact

Ayşegül YARPUZLU

Tıbbi cihaz yatırım kararlarının analitik hiyerarşi yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi

İsmail AĞIRBAŞ, Ersen ÜNSAL

Diz protez cerrahisinde preinsizyonel ve postinsizyonel epidural, bupivakain verapamil ve ketamin postoperatif analjezik tüketimine etkileri

Feyhan ÖKTEN, Asuman UYSALEL, Melek TULUNAY, Enver ÖZGENCİL

İdrar N-asetil-beta-D-glukosaminidaz aktivitesi: İki farklı tayin yönteminin karşılaştırılması

Selime AYAZ, Klara DALVA, Mevhibe BALK, Gül Sevim SAYDAM, İzak DALVA

Kalp cerrahisi ve lokal hipotermi: 731 hastanın retrospektif değerlendirilmesi

Ümit ÖZYURDA, Zeynep Baştüzel EYİLETEN, Adnan UYSALEL, Burak AÇIKGÖZ, Bülent KAYA, Tümer ÇORAPÇIOĞLU, Mustafa Bahadır İNAN, Kemalettin UÇONAK, Atilla ARAL, Levent YAZICIOĞLU

Subaraknoid kanama ve komplikasyonlarının tedavisi

Melih BOZKURT, Nihat EGEMEN, Hasan Çaglar UĞUR, Gökmen KAHİLOĞULLARI, Mevci ÖZDEMİR

Dev mastoid abse: 2 olgu sunumu

İrfan YORULMAZ, Ozan Bağış ÖZGÜRSOY, Mustafa BALCIOĞLU, Emre OCAK

Prophylactic amiodarone administration before ıntraoperative radiofrequency ablation

Ümit ÖZYURDA, Adnan UYSALEL, Kemalettin UÇANOK, Zeynep B EYİLETEN, A.Ruchan AKAR, Mustafa Bahadır İNAN, Sadık ERYILMAZ, Mustafa ŞIRLAK, Levent YAZICIOĞLU