___

• Acarlar, F. (2005). Türkçe ediniminde gelişimsel özelliklerin dil örneği ölçümleri açısından incelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 20(56), 61-74.
• Allen, S. (2003). An analytic comparison of three models of reading strategy instruction. International Review of Appplied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41(4), 319-338.
• Antoniou, F., Souvignier, E. (2007). Strategy instruction in reading comprehension: An intervention study for students With learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: Contemporary Journal, 5(1), 41-57.
• Applegate, M. D., Applegate, A. J., &. Modla, V. B. (2009). "She's my best reader; she just can't comprehend": Studying the relationship between fluency and comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 62(6), 512--521.
• Baydık, B. (2011). Okuma güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin üstbilişsel okuma stratejilerini kullanımı ve öğretmenlerinin okuduğunu anlama öğretim uygulamalarının incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim Dergisi, 36(162), 301-318.
• Baydık, B., Seçkin, Ş. (2012, June). An examination of reading skills of students with reading dijjîculties in informative and narrative texts. Paper presented at the International Journal of Arts Sciences (IJAS) Conference for Academic Disciplines, Florence, Italy.
• Bean, T. W., Steenwyk, F. L. (1984). The effect of three forms of summarization instruction on sixth graders' summary writing and comprehension. Journal ofReading Behavior, 15(4), 297-306.
• Berkeley, S., Mastropieri, M. A., &. Scruggs, T. E. (2011). Reading comprehension strategy instruction and attribution retraining for secondary students With learning and other mild disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(1), 18-32.
• Berkeley, S., Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A. (2010). Reading comprehension instruction for students With learning disabilities, 1995-2006: meta analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 31(6), 423-436.
• Beşgül, M. (2015). Okuma güçlüğü olan ve olmayan öğrencilerin okuduğunu anlama becerilerinin incelenmesi (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi) Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Lefkoşa. http://docs.neu.edu.tr/library/6348828347.pdf adresinden elde edilmiştir.
• Bishop, D. V. M., Adams, C. (1990). prospective study of the relationship between specific language impairment, phonological disorders and reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 3l(7), 1027-1050.
• Bos, C. S., Vaughn, S. (2002). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Bossis-Boll, J. (1986). Learning from text: The development of summarization skills among learning disabled and non-disabled adolescents (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, Indiana). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/
• Botsas, G., Padeliadu, S. (2003). Goal orientation and reading comprehension strategy use among students With and Without reading difficulties. International, Journal of Educational Research, 39(4), 477-495.
• Braxton, D. M. (2009). The efiects of two summarization strategies using expository text on the reading comprehension and summary writing of fourth-and fifth-grade students in an urban, title school (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/
• Brown, A. L., Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Behavior, 22(1), l-l4.
• Bulut, P., Akyol, H. (2014). İlköğretim 5. sınıf öğrencileri ve öğretmenlerinin özetleme stratejileri. International Journal of Language Academy, 2(4), 36-48.
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J., Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31- 42.
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J. (2006). Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 683-696.
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J. (2011). Matthew Effects in young readers: Reading comprehension and reading experience aid vocabulary development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(5), 431-443.
• Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Tomblin, J. B., Zhang, X. (2002). longitudinal investigation of reading outcomes in children with language impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(6), 142--1 157.
• Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Zhang, X., Tomblin, J. B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from longitudinal investigation. Scientific Studies ofReading, 3(4), 331-361.
• Colarusso, R., O'Rourke, C. (2007). Special education for all teachers (4th ed.). Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Pub. Com.
• Çaycı, B., Demir, M. K. (2006). Okuma ve anlama sorunu olan öğrenciler üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir çalışma. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(4), 437--456.
• Çıkrıkçı, S. (2004). İlköğretim öğrencilerinde özetleme becerisinin gelişimi (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Ankara Universitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Dağ, N. (2010). Okuma güçlüğünün giderilmesinde 3P metodu ile boşluk tamamlama (cloze) tekniğinin kullanımı üzerine bir çalışma. Ankara Universitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Ozel Eğitim Dergisi, ll(1), 63-74.
• Dermitzaki, I., Andreou, G., Parskeva, V. (2008). High and low reading comprehension achievers' strategic behaviors and their relation to performance in reading comprehension situation. Reading Psychology, 29(6), 471-492.
• Durkin, D. (1978-1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14(4), 481-533.
• Eğitim Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı (2003). PIRLS 2001 Uluslararası Okuma Becerilerinde Gelişim Projesi Raporu. http://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/dosyalarO/o5Cdokumanlar%5Culuslararasi/pirls_200l_ulusal_raporu.pdf adresinden elde edilmiştir.
• Eğitim Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı (2010). PISA 2009 Uluslararası Öğrenci Değerlendirme Programı Ulusan On Raporu. http://pisa.meb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/PISA-2009-UlusalOn-Raporpdfadresinden elde edilmiştir.
• Elbro, C., Buch-Iversen, I. (2013). Activation of background knowledge for inference making: Effects of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies ofReading, 7(6), 435-452.
• Englert, C. S., Mariage, T. V. (1991). Making students partners in the comprehension process: Organizing the reading "POSSE". Learning Disability Quarterly, l4(2), 123-138.
• Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Fear, K. L., Anderson, L. M. (1988). Students' metacognitive knowledge about how to write informational texts. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11(1), 18-46.
• Ferguson, J. C. (2011). Efects of metacognitive strategy instruction on sixth grade students' content reading comprehension. (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/
• Friend, R. (2001). Teaching summarization as content area reading strategy. Journal of Adolescent Adult Literacy, 44(4), 320-329.
• Gajria, M., Salvia J. (1992). The effects of summarization instruction on text comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58(6), 508-516.
• Gajria, M., Jitendra, A. K., Sood, S., Sacks, G. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(3), 210-225.
• Garner, R. (1984). Rules for summarizing texts: ls classroom instruction being provided? Journal of Educational Research, 77(5), 304-308.
• Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279- 320.
• Gibbs, D. P., Cooper, E. B. (1989). Prevalence of communication disorders in students with learning disabilities. Journal ofLearning Disabilities, 22(1), 60-63.
• Görgen, İ. (1997). Özetleme ve bilgi haritası oluşturma öğretiminin bilgilendirici bir metni öğrenme ve hatırlama düzeyine etkisi (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Hacettepe Universitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Graham, S., Haris, K. R. (1997). Self-regulation and writing: Where do we go from here? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(l), 102-114.
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R. (2012). Writing better: Eflective strategies for teaching students with learning dijjîculties. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
• Haria, P., MacArthur, C., Santoro, L. E. (2010, March). The efiects of teaching text-structure based reading comprehension strategy on struggling fifth grade students' ability to summarize and analyze written arguments. Paper presented at the 3rd Annual Conference of Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, Washington, D. C.
• Hollenbeck, A. F. (2011). Instructional makeover: Supporting the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities in discussion-based format. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46(4) 211--220.
• Hoppes, M. K., Jitendra, A.K, Wilson, B., Cole, C. (1997, April). Enhancing reading comprehension: The role of summarization strategy and self-monitoring. Paper presented at the meeting of the Annual Convention of the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC), Salt Lake City, UT.
• Jitendra, A. K., Gajria, M. (2011). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 43(8), 1-16.
• Jitendra, A. K., Cole, C. L., Hoppes, M. K., Wilson, B. (1998). Effects of direct instruction main idea summarization program and self--monitoring on reading comprehension of middle school students with learning disabilities. Reading Writing Quarterly, 14(4), 379-396.
• Jitendra, A. K., Hoppes, M. K., Xin, Y. P. (2000). Enhancing main idea comprehension for students With learning problems: The role of summarization strategy and self-monitoring instruction. The Journal of Special Education, 34(3), 127-139.
• Johnson, L., Graham, S., Harris, K. R. (1997). The effects of goal setting and self-instructions on learning reading comprehension strategy: study with students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(1), 80-91.
• Jones, R. C. (2007). Strategies for reading comprehension: Summarizing. Retrieved from http://www.readingquest.org/strat/summarizehtml
• Kamhi-Stein, L. (1993). Summarization, notetaking, and mapping techniques: Lessons for L2 reading instruction. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed. gov/fulltext/ED360816.pdf
• Karasar, N. (201 1). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (21. baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
• Karatay, H., Okur, S. (2012). Öğretmen adaylarının öyküleyici ve bilgilendirici metinleri özetleme becerileri. International Journal of Social Science, 5(7), 399-420.
• Kelley, M. J., Clausen-Glace, N. (2007). Comprehension shouldn't be silent: From strategy instruction to student independence. United States of America: International Reading Association.
• Kim, W., Linan-Thompson, S., Misquitta, R. (2012). Critical factors in reading comprehension mstruction for students with learning disabilities: research synthesis. Learning Disabilities Research Practice, 27(2), 66-78.
• Kintsch, E. (1990). Macroprocesses and microprocesses in the development of summarization skill. Cognition and instruction, 7(3), 161-195. Retrieved from http://WWW.colorado.edu/ics/sites/default/files/attachedfiles/89-05.pdf
• Kintsch, W., Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363-394.
• Klingner, J. K., Urbach, ., Golos, D., Brownel, M., Menon, S. (2010). Teaching reading in the 2lst century: glimpse at how special education teachers promote reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(2), 59-74.
• Littlefield, A. R. (2011). The relations among summarizing ınstruction, support for student choice, reading engagement and expository text comprehension (Doctoral dissertation, The Catholic University of America). Retrieved from http://searchproquest.com/
• Malone, L. D., Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and selfmonitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58(3), 270-279.
• Mercer, C. D., Mercer, A. R. (2005). Teaching students with learning problems (7th ed.). United States of America: Pearson.
• Merritt, D. D., Culatta, B. (1998). Language intervention in the classroom (School-Age Children Series). United States of America: Singular.
• Meyer, B. J. F., Ray, M. N. (2011). Structure strategy interventions: Increasing reading comprehension of expository text. International Electronic Journal ofElementary Education, 4(1), 127-152.
• Nagy, W. E., Carlisle, J. F., Goodwin, A. P. (2014). Morphological knowledge and literacy acquisition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1) 3-12.
• National Reading Panel (NRP). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Retrieved from https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/documents/report.pdf
• Nelson, J. R., Smith, D. J., Dodd, J. M. (1992). The effects of teaching summary skills strategy to students identified as learning disabled on their comprehension of science text. Education and Treatment of Children, 15(3), 228-243.
• Oakhill, J., Cain, K. (2000). Children's difficulties in text comprehension: Assessing causal issues. Journal of Deaf Studies and DeafEducation, 5(1), 51-59.
• Oakhill, J., Patel, S. (1991). Can imagery training help children who have comprehension problems? Journal ofResearch in Reading, 14(2),106-115.
• Palincsar, A. S. (1982). Improving the reading comprehension ofiunior high students through the reciprocal teaching of comprehension-monitoring strategies (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/
• Pesa, N., Somers, S. (2007). Improving reading comprehension through application and transfer of reading strategies (A Research Project). Chicago, Illinois: Saint Xavier University Pearson Achievement Solutions. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED496540.pdf
• Priebe, S. J., Keenan, J. M., Miller, A. C. (2012). How prior knowledge affects word identification and comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25(1),l3l-l49.
• Sâenz, L. M., Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Examining the reading difficulty of secondary students with learning disabilities: Expository versus narrative text. Remedial and Special Education, 23(1), 31-41.
• Sanford, K. L. (2015). Factors that aflect the reading comprehension of secondary students with disabilities (Doctoral dissertation, University of San Francisco). Retrieved fromhttp://search.proquest.c0m/
• Sarıpınar, E. G., Erden, G. (2010). Okuma güçlüğünde akademik beceri ve duyusal-motor işlevleri değerlendirme testlerinin kullanılabilirliği. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 25(65), 56-66.
• Solomon, P. (2012). The effects of graphic organizers on improving the summarizing skills offourth grade students (Master's thesis, Florida International University). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/
• Sönmez, V. (2003). Metinlerin egitselligini saptamada matematiksel bir yaklaşnn. Eğitim Araştırmaları, 10, 24- 39.
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360-406.
• Susar Kırmızı, F., Akkaya, N. (2011). qualitative study on the use of summarizing strategies in elemantary education. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 41(41), 267-277.
• Swanson, E. A. (2008). Observing reading instruction for students with learning disabilities: synthesis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(3), 115-133.
• Swanson, E. A., Vaughn, S. (2010). An observation study of reading instruction provided to elementary students w1th learning disabilities in the resource room. Psychology in the Schools, 47(5), 481-492.
• Swanson, P. N., &De La Paz, S. (1998). Teaching effective comprehension strategies to students with learning and reading disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33(4), 209-218.
• Şenel, H. G. (1998). Okuma güçlüğü olan ve olmayan ilkokul öğrencilerinin okuma düzeylerinin ve dislektik özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Ankara Universitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Takala, M. (2006). The effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension in mainstream and special education. Scandinavian Journal ofEducational Researh, 50(5), 559-576.
• Tarchi, C. (2010). Reading comprehension of informative texts in secondary school: focus on direct and indirect effects of reader's prior knowledge. Psychology in the Schools, 20(5), 415 -420.
• VanDyke, J. A. (1997). Reading comprehension needs of students with learning disabilities in an inclusion setting: Class-wide peer tutoring with summarization strategy (Master's thesis, Grand Valley State University). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/
• Walmsley, S. A., Walp, T. P. (1990). Integrating literature and composing into the language arts curriculum: Philosophy and practice. Elementary School Journal, 90(3), 251-274.
• Westby, C. Culatta, B., Lawrence, B., Hall-Kenyon, K. (2010). Summarizing expository texts. Topics in Language Disorders, 30(4), 275-287.
• Williams, J. P. (1991). Comprehension by learning disabled and nondisabled adolescents of personal/social problems presented in text. American Journal of Psychology, 104(4), 563-586.
• Williams, J. P. (1993). Comprehension of students With and Without learning disabilities: Identification of narrative themes and idiosyncratic text representations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4),631- 641. Winograd, P. N. (1983). Strategic dijj'iculties in summarizing texts. Technical Report No. 274. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED2286 6.pdf
• Wong, B. (1979). Increasing retention of main ideas through questioning strategies. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2(2), 42-47.
• Wormeli, R. (2004). Summarization in any subject: 50 techniques to improve student learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Yazıcı Okuyan, H., Gedikoğlu, Y. G. (2011). Öğretmenlerce üretilen yazılı özet metinlerin niteliksel özellikleri. Gaziantep Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(2), 1007-1020.
• Yüksel, A. (2010). Okuma güçlüğü çeken bir öğrencinin okuma becerisinin geliştirilmesine yönelik bir çalışma. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 3(1), 124-134.