AB Hukukunun Bloke Edici Etkisi

AB ve üyeleri arasında yetki taksimi Avrupa entegrasyon sürecinin en tartışmalı konularından biridir. Her anlaşma değişikliği yoğun bir şekilde yetki düzeninde yaratacağı muhtemel sonuçlar bakımından inceleme konusu yapıldığı gibi, hiçbir ulusal yasama faaliyeti mevcut Avrupa hukuku ışığında değerlendirilmeden gerçekleşememektedir. Lizbon anlaşmasında Avrupa hukukunda ilk kez bloke edici etkisi olan supranasyonal yetki alanları ve ulusal yetki alanları açık şekilde düzenlenmiştir. Makale Avrupa hukukunun bloke edici etkisini, koşullarını, üye devletlerin yasama faaliyetleri üzerindeki sonuçlarını ele almaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler:

rakip yetkiler, münhasır yetkiler, paralel yetkiler, yetki katalogları

BLOCKING EFFECT OF EUROPEAN UNION LAW

Shared competence between EU and Members is one of the most controversial topic of European integration process. Every agreement chance is subject of study on probable consequences of competence order and any legislative act can substantiate without considering in the light of European law. In European law, supranational competence which has blocking aﬀ ect and national competence has been regulated clearly for the fi rst time by Treaty of Lisbon. This article takes blocking eﬀ ect of European law, conditions and consequences of this blocking on Member States legislative cats eﬀ ect in hand

Keywords:

Rival competence, exclusive competence, parallel competence, competence catalogues,

PDF

___

Albrecht Weber, vom Verfassungsvertrag zum Lissabon, EuZW 2008
Beate Braams Die Kompetenzordnung im Vertrag von Lissabon, bknz: Ingolf Pernice (Hrsg.), Der Vertrag von Lissabon, 2008
Christian.Calliess, bknz.: Christian Calliess/Matthias Ruff ert (Hrsg.), EuV/AEUV, 4.Aufl . 2011, Art.2 AEUV
Christopf Degenhart, bknz.: Michael Sachs (Hrsg.), Grundgesetz, 6.bası, 2011
Christopf Möllers Gewaltengliederung, 2005
Christopf Ritzer Europäische Kompetenzordnung, 2006
Daniel Scharf Die Kompetenzordnung im Vertrag von Lissabon, bknz.: Christian Tietje (Hrsg.), Beiträge zum Europa und Völkerrecht, Heft 3
Erwin Chemerinsky, Constitutional Law, 4.Aufl age, 2011, Chapeter 5
Eugene D.Cross Pre-emption of Member State Law in the European Economic Community: A Framework for Analysis, CML Rev.29 (1992)
Hans Dieter Jarass/Sasa Beljin Die Bedeutung von Vorrang und Durchführung des EG-Rechts für die nationale Rechtsetzung und Rechtsanwendung, NVwZ 2004
Joseph Weiler The Community System: the Dual Character of Supranationalism, YEL 1 (1981)
Martin Nettesheim bknz.: Eberhard Grabitz/Meinhard Hilf/Martin Nettesheim (Hrsg.), Das Recht der Europäischen Union, ErgL 51, ErgL.2013, Art.2 AEUV
Michel Waelbroeck, The Emergent Doctrine of Community Preemption ̶ Consent and Re-delegation, bknz.: Terrance Sandalow/Eric Stein (Hrsg.), Courts and Free Markets, Volume II, 1982
Robert Schütze Supremacy without pre-emption? The very slowly emergent doctrine of Community Pre-emption, CMR Rev.43 (2006)
Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer 8.9.2009, Rs. C-478/07 (Budvar), Slg. 2009, I-7721, R.93).
Samuel Krislov/Claus Dieter Ehlermann/ The Political Organs and the Decision-Making
Joseph Weiler Process in the United States and the European
Community, bknz.: Mauro Cappelletti/Monica
Seccombe/Joseph Weiler (Hrsg.), Integration
Through Law, Volume 1, Book 2, 1986
Thomas Oppermann/Claus Dieter,Classen/Martin Nettesheim Europarecht, 5.Aufl . 2011, §38, Rn.25).
Thomas Oppermann Eine Verfassung für die Europäische Union, DVBl. 2003
Ulrich Haltern, Europarecht, 2.Aufl age 2007
Volkmar Götz Kompetenzverteilung und Kompetenz-kontrolle in der Europäischen Union, bknz.: Jürgen Schwarze (Hrsg.), Der Verfassungsentwurf des Europäischen Konvents, 2004