ŞEKER YÜKLEME TESTINE NE OLDU? MEDYANIN HALK SAĞLIĞI ÜZERINE ETKISI

AMAÇ: Ünlü bir hekimin şeker yükleme testinin zararlı olduğunuiddia etmesinden sonra kliniğimizde şeker yükleme testlerinin uy- gulanma sıklığının etkilenip etkilenmediğini araştırmaktır.YÖNTEM: Ocak 2012-Aralık 2017 tarihleri arasında Ankara Eği- tim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniğigebe polikliniğinde uygulanan şeker yükleme testlerinin sayı veoranları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Testlerin uygulanma sıklıklarıyıllara göre Kruskal Wallis Test veya Mann Whitney U Test kullanı- larak karşılaştırıldı.BULGULAR: 2014 yılı ikinci yarısından itibaren şeker yüklemetestlerinin uygulanma sıklığının azaldığı görüldü. Hastanemizdeyapılan şeker yükleme test oranları 2013’te en yüksekken (%7.55)bu oran 2014 yılından itibaren düşmüştür. Bu oran 2015’te %4.01’e;2017’de ise %3.9’a düşmüştür. Bu değişim istatistiksel olarak anlam- lıydı (p

WHAT HAPPENED TO THE GLUCOSE LOADING TEST? THE IMPACT OF MEDIA ON PUBLIC HEALTH

INTRODUCTION: After a famous clinician claims that the sugar loading test is harmful, we investigate whether the frequency of app- lication of glucose loading tests in our clinic is affected METHODS: The number and rates of glucose loading tests perfor- med at the Ankara Training and Research Hospital Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic between January 2012 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The frequency of testing was compared by years. FINDINGS: From the second half of 2014, it was observed that the frequency of application of glucose loading tests decreased. The ra- tes of GCT and OGTT performed in our hospital are highest in 2013 (7.55%) and this rate has been decreasing since 2014. This ratio is 4.01% in 2015. In 2017, it decreased to 3.9%. This change was sta- tistically significant (p

PDF

___

1.)Hoffman SJ, Mansoor Y, Natt N, Sritharan L, Belluz J, Caulfield T, et al. Celebrities' impact on health-related knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and status outcomes: protocol for a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):13.
2.)Evers C, Fischer C, Dikow N, Schott S. Familial breast cancer: Genetic counseling over time, including patients expectations and initiators considering the Angelina Jolie effect. PloS one. 2017;12(5):e0177893.
3.)Cundy T, Gamble G, Townend K, Henley PG, MacPherson P, Roberts AB. Perinatal mortality in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2000;17(1):33-9.
4.)Hartling L, Dryden DM, Guthrie A, Muise M, Vandermeer B, Aktary WM, et al. Screening and diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus. Evidence report/technology assessment. 2012(210):1-327.
5.)Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Antoniou G, Baghurst P, Robinson JS. Screening for gestational diabetes: the effect of varying blood glucose definitions in the prediction of adverse maternal and infant health outcomes. The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology. 2007;47(4):307-12.
6.)Group HSCR, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. The New England journal of medicine. 2008;358(19):1991-2002.
7.)Jensen DM, Korsholm L, Ovesen P, Beck-Nielsen H, MolstedPedersen L, Damm P. Adverse pregnancy outcome in women with mild glucose intolerance: is there a clinically meaningful threshold value for glucose? Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2008;87(1):59-62.
8.)Helton MR, Arndt J, Kebede M, King M. Do low-risk prenatal patients really need a screening glucose challenge test? J Fam Pract. 1997;44(6):556-61.
9.)Chevalier N, Fenichel P, Giaume V, Loizeau S, Bongain A, Daideri G, et al. Universal two-step screening strategy for gestational diabetes has weak relevance in French Mediterranean women: should we simplify the screening strategy for gestational diabetes in France? Diabetes & metabolism. 2011;37(5):419-25.
10.)Danilenko-Dixon DR, Van Winter JT, Nelson RL, Ogburn PL, Jr. Universal versus selective gestational diabetes screening: application of 1997 American Diabetes Association recommendations. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1999;181(4):798-802.
11.)Committee on Practice B-O. Practice Bulletin No. 180: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2017;130(1):e17-e37.
12.)Wang C, Guelfi KJ, Yang HX. Exercise and its role in gestational diabetes mellitus. Chronic diseases and translational medicine. 2016;2(4):208-14.