COVID-19 Pandemisinin Meme Kanseri Tarama ve Tanı Sürecine Etkisi

Amaç: COVID-19 pandemisi meme kanseri taramalarında ve tanısal işlemlerinde gecikmeye neden oldu. Bu çalışmanın amacı; pandemi sürecindeki meme kanseri tarama ve tanısal işlemleri ile yeni tanı konan meme kanseri meme kanseri olgularının pandemi öncesindeki dönemle karşılaştırılmasıydı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu retrospektif çalışmada pandemi öncesinde (Mart 2019-Şubat 2020) ve pandemi sürecinde (Mart 2020- Şubat 2021) yapılan mamografi taramaları, görüntüleme eşliğinde meme biyopsiler ve yeni tanı alan meme kanseri vakaları değerlendirildi. Mamografi ve biyopsilerin sayıları ve zamana göre dağılımı karşılaştırıldı. Meme kanseri vakalarında ise tümörün histopatolojik özellikleri ve evresi karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Pandemi öncesine kıyasla pandemi sürecinde en belirgini Nisan (-%98) ve Mayıs (-%93) aylarında olmak üzere mamografi sayılarında toplamda %44 azalma olduğu görüldü. Görüntüleme eşliğinde biyopsi sayılarında Nisan (-%100) ve Mayıs aylarında önemli miktarda azalma olmakla birlikte Haziran ayında %29 ile başlayan ve devam eden artışla tüm pandemi periyodu değerlendirildiğinde azalma olmadığı görüldü. Meme kanseri grubunda ise pandemi öncesine kıyasla pandemi döneminde tanı anında metastaz ile başvuran hasta sayısında anlamlı artış olduğu görüldü (p=0.001). İki grup arasında tümörün hormon reseptör durumu, HER2 pozitifliği ya da derece açısından anlamlı fark olmadığı görüldü (p>0.05). Sonuç: Bu çalışmada COVID-19 pandemisi sırasında meme kanserinde hem tarama hem de tanı süreçlerinin önemli ölçüde etkilendiği gözlemlendi. Pandeminin ilk aylarında hastaneye başvurunun gecikmesinin tanı anında metastatik olan hastalarda artışa neden olduğu görüldü. Aim: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused delays in breast cancer screening and diagnostic procedures. The aim of this research was to compare the status of breast cancer screenings and newly diagnosed breast cancer cases during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period. Material and method: This retrospective study included patients with screening mammography, imaging-guided biopsies, and newly diagnosed breast cancer from March 2020– February 2021 (during-COVID-19) were compared with March 2019–February 2020 (pre-COVID-19). We compared numbers and distribution over time of mammography and biopsies between the time periods. In the breast cancer group; the stage at diagnosis and histopathological features of the tumor were also compared. Results: Compared to pre-pandemic mammography scans, a 44% decrease was observed in total during pandemic, the most significant being in April (-98%) and May (-93%). While there was a significant decrease in the number of biopsies in April (-100%) and May (-69%), it was seen that there was no decrease in the pandemic period when the whole year was looked at with a rebound increase that started with 29% in June. In the breast cancer group, there was a significant increase in the number of patients who were metastatic at the time of diagnosis compared to the pre-pandemic period (p=0.001). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of tumor grade, hormone receptor status, or HER2 positivity (p>0.05). Conclusions: In this study, it was observed that both screening and diagnosis processes in breast cancer were significantly affected during the COVID-19 pandemic. It was observed that the delay in admission to the hospital in the first months of the pandemic resulted in an increase in patients who were metastatic at the time of diagnosis.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Process

Aim: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused delays in breast cancer screening and diagnostic procedures. The aim of this research was to compare the status of breast cancer screenings and newly diagnosed breast cancer cases during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period. Material and method: This retrospective study included patients with screening mammography, imaging-guided biopsies, and newly diagnosed breast cancer from March 2020– February 2021 (during-COVID-19) were compared with March 2019–February 2020 (pre-COVID-19). We compared numbers and distribution over time of mammography and biopsies between the time periods. In the breast cancer group; the stage at diagnosis and histopathological features of the tumor were also compared. Results: Compared to pre-pandemic mammography scans, a 44% decrease was observed in total during pandemic, the most significant being in April (-98%) and May (-93%). While there was a significant decrease in the number of biopsies in April (-100%) and May (-69%), it was seen that there was no decrease in the pandemic period when the whole year was looked at with a rebound increase that started with 29% in June. In the breast cancer group, there was a significant increase in the number of patients who were metastatic at the time of diagnosis compared to the pre-pandemic period (p=0.001). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of tumor grade, hormone receptor status, or HER2 positivity (p>0.05). Conclusions: In this study, it was observed that both screening and diagnosis processes in breast cancer were significantly affected during the COVID-19 pandemic. It was observed that the delay in admission to the hospital in the first months of the pandemic resulted in an increase in patients who were metastatic at the time of diagnosis.

___

  • 1. Roberts DL, Rossman JS, Jarić I. Dating first cases of COVID-19. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17(6):e1009620. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1009620
  • 2. Citgez B, Yigit B, Capkinoglu E, Yetkin SG. Management of Breast Cancer during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2020;54(2):132-135. doi:10.14744/SEMB.2020.23326
  • 3. Prabhakar AM, Glover M 4th, Schaefer PW, Brink JA. Academic Radiology Departmental Operational Strategy Related to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020;17(6):730-733. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2020.04.004
  • 4. Vanni G, Pellicciaro M, Materazzo M, et al. Lockdown of Breast Cancer Screening for COVID-19: Possible Scenario. In Vivo. 2020;34(5):3047-3053. doi:10.21873/invivo.12139
  • 5. TR Ministry of Health. Turkey Cancer Control Programme. Ankara, Turkey, 2021.
  • 6. Caplan L. Delay in breast cancer: implications for stage at diagnosis and survival. Front Public Health. 2014;2:87. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2014.00087.
  • 7. Puliti D, Bucchi L, Mancini S, et al. Advanced breast cancer rates in the epoch of service screening: The 400,000 women cohort study from Italy. Eur J Cancer. 2017;75:109-116. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2016.12.030
  • 8. Tonneson JE, Hoskin TL, Day CN, Durgan DM, Dilaveri CA, Boughey JC. Impact of the COVID-19 Pand emic on Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis, Presentation, and Patient Management. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(4):2231-2239. doi:10.1245/s10434-021-11088-6
  • 9. Eijkelboom AH, de Munck L, Vrancken Peeters MTFD, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnosis, stage, and initial treatment of breast cancer in the Netherlands: a population-based study. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):64. doi:10.1186/s13045-021-01073-7
  • 10. Gathani T, Clayton G, MacInnes E, Horgan K. The COVID-19 pandemic and impact on breast cancer diagnoses: what happened in England in the first half of 2020. Br J Cancer. 2021;124(4):710-712. doi:10.1038/s41416-020-01182-z
  • 11. McBain RK, Cantor JH, Jena AB, Pera MF, Bravata DM, Whaley CM. Decline and Rebound in Routine Cancer Screening Rates During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(6):1829-1831. doi:10.1007/s11606-021-06660-5
  • 12. Linck PA, Garnier C, Depetiteville MP, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown in France on the diagnosis and staging of breast cancers in a tertiary cancer centre. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(3):1644-1651. doi:10.1007/s00330-021-08264-3
  • 13. Simão D, Sardinha M, Reis AF, Spencer AS, Luz R, Oliveira S. What Has Changed During the COVID-19 Pandemic? - The Effect on an Academic Breast Department in Portugal. Eur J Breast Health. 2021;18(1):74-78. doi:10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-11-1
  • 14. Maringe C, Spicer J, Morris M, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer deaths due to delays in diagnosis in England, UK: a national, population-based, modelling study Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(8):1023-1034. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30388-0
  • 15. Hamilton W. Cancer diagnostic delay in the COVID-19 era: what happens next?. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(8):1000-1002. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30391-0
  • 16. Kalli S, Semine A, Cohen S, Naber SP, Makim SS, Bahl M. American Joint Committee on Cancer's Staging System for Breast Cancer, Eighth Edition: What the Radiologist Needs to Know. Radiographics. 2018;38(7):1921-1933. doi:10.1148/rg.2018180056
  • 17. Kolak A, Kamińska M, Sygit K, et al. Primary and secondary prevention of breast cancer. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017;24(4):549-553. doi:10.26444/aaem/75943
  • 18. Lebron-Zapata L, Jochelson MS. Overview of Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. PET Clin. 2018;13(3):301-323. doi:10.1016/j.cpet.2018.02.001.
  • 19. Cedolini C, Bertozzi S, Londero AP, et al. Type of breast cancer diagnosis, screening, and survival. Clin Breast Cancer. 2014;14(4):235-240. doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2014.02.004
  • 20. Puliti D, Bucchi L, Mancini S, et al. Advanced breast cancer rates in the epoch of service screening: The 400,000 women cohort study from Italy. Eur J Cancer. 2017;75:109-116. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2016.12.030
  • 21. Naidich JJ, Boltyenkov A, Wang JJ, Chusid J, Hughes D, Sanelli PC. Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on Imaging Case Volumes. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020;17(7):865-872. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2020.05.004
  • 22. Norbash AM, Moore AV Jr, Recht MP, et al. Early-Stage Radiology Volume Effects and Considerations with the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: Adaptations, Risks, and Lessons Learned. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020;17(9):1086-1095. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2020.07.001
  • 23. Nyante SJ, Benefield TS, Kuzmiak CM, Earnhardt K, Pritchard M, Henderson LM. Population-level impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on breast cancer screening and diagnostic procedures. Cancer. 2021;127(12):2111-2121. doi:10.1002/cncr.33460
  • 24. The American Society of Breast Surgeons and The American College of Radiology. Joint Statement on Breast Screening Exams During the Covid-19 Pandemic. https://www.breastsurgeons.org/news/?id=45. Accessed May 29,2022.
  • 25. Madhuripan N, Cheung HMC, Alicia Cheong LH, Jawahar A, Willis MH, Larson DB. Variables Influencing Radiology Volume Recovery During the Next Phase of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020;17(7):855-864. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2020.05.026
  • 26. Tachibana BMT, Ribeiro RLM, Federicci ÉEF, et al. The delay of breast cancer diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic in São Paulo, Brazil. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2021;19:eAO6721. doi:10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO6721
  • 27. Coskun Bilge A, Aydin H, Esen Bostanci I. Impact Of The First Wave Of The Covid - 19 Pandemic On Breast Imaging Practice – A Tertiary Cancer Care Hospital Experience. Ankara Eğt. Arş. Hast. Derg., 2022 ; 55(3) : 175-178. doi: 10.20492/aeahtd.1025814
  • 28. İlgün AS, Özmen V. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Breast Cancer Patients. Eur J Breast Health. 2021;18(1):85-90. doi:10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-11-5
  • 29. Vanni G, Tazzioli G, Pellicciaro M, et al. Delay in Breast Cancer Treatments During the First COVID-19 Lockdown. A Multicentric Analysis of 432 Patients. Anticancer Res. 2020;40(12):7119-7125. doi:10.21873/anticanres.14741
  • 30. Gürsoy M, Aslan Ö, Oktay Alfatlı A, Zekioğlu O, Göktepe B. Radiological and clinicopathological findings of breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative study with the pre-pandemic era. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2023;29(1):53-58. doi:10.5152/dir.2022.21646
  • 31. Mariotto AB, Etzioni R, Hurlbert M, Penberthy L, Mayer M. Estimation of the Number of Women Living with Metastatic Breast Cancer in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26(6):809-815. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0889
  • 32. Maringe C, Spicer J, Morris M, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer deaths due to delays in diagnosis in England, UK: a national, population-based, modelling study Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(8):1023-1034. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30388-0
Ankara Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1304-6187
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2003
  • Yayıncı: Ankara Eğitim ve Araşt. Hast.
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

PRİMER ANTERİOR OMUZ ÇIKIĞINDA KONSERVATİF TEDAVİ YETERİ KADAR BAŞARILI MI?

Toygun Kağan EREN, Atakan ERDOĞAN, Cem Nuri AKTEKİN

Kadınların Algıladıkları Meme Kanseri Riskinin Belirlenmesi

Eda YAKIT AK, Mehmet Ali ŞEN

COVID-19 Pandemisinin Meme Kanseri Tarama ve Tanı Sürecine Etkisi

Hande Melike BÜLBÜL, Nur HÜRSOY, Filiz TAŞÇI, Recep BEDİR, Ogün BÜLBÜL, Esra AYDIN, Ahmet PERGEL

COVID-19 Hastalarında Ventilatörle İlişkili Pnömoni Risk Faktörleri ve Patojenlerin Değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif Bir Çalışma

Saliha YARIMOGLU, Rafet YARIMOGLU

Kadınlarda Toplumsal Cinsiyet Algısı ile Aile İçi Şiddet Farkındalığı Arasındaki İlişki

Nilay GÖKBULUT, Emine İBİCİ AKÇA, Ebru CERAN

Kronik Böbrek Yetmezliği Hastalarında Kaşıntı Semptomunun Gece Uyku ve Yaşam Kalitesine Etkisi

Esra TÜRKER, Gözdenur TANRIKULU

Statik Germe Süresinin Gastroknemius Kas Vaskülarizasyonu Üzerine Akut Etkilerinin Superb Mikrovasküler Görüntüleme Yöntemi ile İncelenmesi

Kamile UZUN AKKAYA, Habip ESER AKKAYA

Transobturator Tape (TOT) operasyonunun kadınların cinsel ve psikolojik fonksiyonları üzerine etkisi: Çok merkezli prospektif çalışma / The effect of Transobturator Tape (TOT) on female sexual and psychological functions: A multi centered prospective study

Demirhan Örsan DEMİR, Berat Cem ÖZGÜR, Arif DEMİRBAS, Veli Mert YAZAR, Burak AKSELİM, Cem Nedim YÜCETÜRK, Turgay KAÇAN

Erişkin Hastalarda Akut Komplike Apandisit Tanısında Yeni Bir Belirteç: Nötrofil/Albümin Oranı

Serdar SAHİN

Klinik ve Sonografik Bulguların Endometriyal Histopatolojik Sonucu Öngörmesi

Deniz OLUKLU, Yusuf USTUN, Hasan UÇKAN, Ayşe HAZIRBULAN, Osman AYDIN