Jannicke MELLIN-OLSEN, Sven STAENDER, David K. WHITAKER, Andrew F. SMITH

The helsinki declaration on patient safety in anaesthesiology

Anaesthesiology, which includes anaesthesia, perioperative care, intensive care medicine, pain therapy and emergency medicine, has always participated in systematic attempts to improve patient safety. Anaesthesiologists have a unique, crossspecialty opportunity to influence the safety and quality of patient care. Past achievements have allowed our specialty a perception that it has become safe, but there should be no room for complacency when there is more to be done. Increasingly older and sicker patients, more complex surgical interventions, more pressure on throughput, new drugs and devices and simple chance all pose hazards in the work of anaesthesiologists. In response to this increasingly difficult and complex working environment, the European Board of Anaesthesiology (EBA), in cooperation with the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA), has produced a blueprint for patient safety in anaesthesiology. This document, to be known as the Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology, was endorsed by these two bodies together with the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists (WFSA), and the European Patients’ Federation (EPF) at the Euroanaesthesia meeting in Helsinki in June 2010. The Declaration represents a shared European view of that which is worthy, achievable, and needed to improve patient safety in anaesthesiology in 2010. The Declaration recommends practical steps that all anaesthesiologists who are not already using them can successfully include in their own clinical practice. In parallel, EBA and ESA have launched a joint patient safety task-force in order to put these recommendations into practice. It is planned to review this Declaration document regularly.Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:592-597.

PDF

___

1. Smith AF. Patient safety: people, systems and techniques. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51 (Suppl 1):51–53.

2. Van der Schaaf TW. Medical applications of industrial safety science. Qual Saf Healthcare 2002; 11:205–206.

3. Staender S, Davies J, Helmreich B, et al. The anaesthesia critical incident reporting system: an experience based database. Int J Med Inf 1997; 47:87–90.

4. Staender S, Kaufmann M, Scheidegger D. Critical incident reporting systems in anaesthesia. In: Vincent Ch, de Mol B, editors. Safety in Medicine. Oxford: Pergamon, Elsevier Science; 2000. pp. 65–82.

5. Smith AF, Mahajan RP. National critical incident reporting: improving patient safety. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103:623–625.

6. Winters BD, Gurses AP, Lehmann H, et al. Clinical review: checklists – translating evidence into practice. Crit Care 2009; 13:210.

7. Smith AF, Pope C, Goodwin D, Mort M. Interprofessional handover and patient safety in anaesthesia: observational study of handovers in the recovery room. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 332–337.

8. Vincent C, Taylor-Adams S, Chapman EJ, et al. How to investigate and analyse clinical incidents: clinical risk unit and association of litigation and risk management protocol. BMJ 2000; 320:777–781.

9. An organisation with a memory. Department of Health, United Kingdom. 13.6.2000. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/ DH_4065083. [Accessed 8 April 2010].

10. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. The Institute of Medicine report on medical error. The Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.

11. de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, et al. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Healthcare 2008; 17:216–223.

12. Clifton BS, Hotten WI. Deaths associated with anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1963; 35:250–259.

13. Harrison GG. Death attributable to anaesthesia.A 10-year survey (1967–1976). Br J Anaesth 1978; 50:1041–1046.

14. Hovi-Viander M. Death associated with anaesthesia in Finland. Br J Anaesth 1980; 52:483–489.

15. Marx GF, Mateo CV, Orkin LR. Computer analysis of postanest- hetic deaths. Anesthesiology 1973; 39:54–58.

16. Schapira M, Kepes ER, Hurwitt ES. An analysis of deaths in the operating room and within 24 h of surgery. Anesth Analg 1960; 39:149–157.

17. Keenan RL, Boyan CP. Decreasing frequency of anesthetic cardiac arrests. J Clin Anesth 1991; 3:354–357.

18. Arbous MS, Grobbee DE, van Kleef JW, et al. Mortality associated with anaesthesia: a qualitative analysis to identify risk factors. Anaesthesia 2001; 56:1141–1153.

19. Lienhart A, Auroy Y, Pequignot F, et al. Survey of anesthesia-related mortality in France. Anesthesiology 2006; 105:1087–1097.

20. Gibbs N, Borton CL. Safety of anaesthesia in Australia. A review of anaesthesia related mortality 2000–2002. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. http://www.anzca.edu.au/reso- urces/ professional-documents/professional-standards/ps7.html. [Accessed 8 April 2010].

21. Li G, Warner M, Lang BH, et al. Epidemiology of anesthesia-related mortality in the United States, 1999–2005. Anesthesiology 2009; 110:759–765.

22. Lagasse RS. Anesthesia safety: model or myth? A review of the published literature and analysis of current original data. Anesthesiology 2002; 97:1609–1617.

23. Bothner U, Georgieff M, Schwilk B. Building a large-scale perioperative anaesthesia outcome-tracking database: methodology, implementation, and experiences from one provider within the German quality project. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85:271–280.

24. Fasting S, Gisvold SE. Statistical process control methods allow the analysis and improvement of anesthesia care. Can J Anaesth 2003; 50:767–774.

25. Thomas AN, Pilkington CE, Greer R. Critical incident reporting in UK intensive care units: a postal survey. J Eval Clin Pract 2003; 9:59–68.

26. Boelle PY, Garnerin P, Sicard JF, et al. Voluntary reporting system in anaesthesia: is there a link between undesirable and critical events? Qual Healthcare 2000; 9:203–209.

27. Catchpole K, Bell MD, Johnson S. Safety in anaesthesia: a study of 12,606 reported incidents from the UK National Reporting and Learning System. Anaesthesia 2008; 63:340–346.

28. Gaba DM. Anaesthesiology as a model for patient safety in healthcare. BMJ 2000; 320:785–788.

29. Boulton TB. The Association of Anaesthestists of Great Britain and Ireland 1932–1992 and The Development of the Specialty of Anaesthesia. Sixty years of progress and achievement in the context of Scientific, political and social change. London, UK: the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland; 1999. pp. 59–60.

30. Smith AF, Goodwin D, Mort M, Pope C. Adverse events in anaesthetic practice: qualitative study of definition, discussion and reporting. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96:715–721.

31. Moreno RP, Rhodes A, Donchin Y. Patient safety in intensive care medicine: the Declaration of Vienna. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:1667–1672.

32. De Robertis E, Tomins P, Knape H. Anaesthesiologists in emergency medicine: the desirable manpower. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27:223–225.

33. Smith A. Audit commission tackles anaesthetic services. BMJ 1998; 316:3–4.

34. Jorm C. Patient safety and quality: can anaesthetists play a greater role? Anaesthesia 2003; 58:833–834.

35. Vimlati L, Gilsanz F, Goldik Z. Quality and safety guidelines of postanaesthesia care: Working Party on Post Anaesthesia Care (approved by the European Board and Section of Anaesthesiology, Union Europeenne des Medecins Specialistes). Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 26:715–721.

36. Staender SE. Patient safety in anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol 2010; 76:45–50.