Koroner arter cerrahisinde aprotinin ve traneksamik asit: II) Miyokard, akciğer ve santral sinir sistemi üzerine etkileri

Kan kaybını azaltmak amacıyla kullanılan aprotinin ve traneksamik asitin kontrol grubu ile karşılaştırmalı olarak miyokard, akciğer ve santral sinir sistemi üzerine etkilerini primer koroner arter bypass greftlemesi yapılacak olgularda araştırmayı amaçladık.Altmış olgu üç gruba ayrıldı: Aprotinin uygulananlar (total doz 6x106 KIU, n=20, Grup A), traneksamik asit uygulananlar (total 10 g, n=20, Grup T) ve kontrol grubu (n=20, Grup K). Miyokard enzimleri (troponin I, CKMB, SGOT, LDH,), akciğer kompliyansı, rezistansı, PaO2/PAO2 ve PaO2/FiO2, laktat düzeyleri ve hemodinamik ölçümler kardiopulmoner bypass (KPB) öncesi ve sonrası çeşitli zaman periyotlarında belirlendi. Postoperatif mortalite, kognitif fonksiyon bozuklukları, yoğun bakımda kalış ve taburcu oluş süreleri kaydedildi. Troponin I düzeyi KPB'ın 6. saattinde kontrol grubunda diğer iki gruba göre anlamlı olarak yüksekti, ancak bu enzim yüksekliği normal sınırlar içerisindeydi (Grup A: 8.70±2.10; Grup T: 11.80±1.80; Grup K: 20.80±4.09 ng.ml-1 p=0.012). Postoperatif miyokard infaktüsü insidansı yine benzerdi (Grup A: 1 olgu; Grup T: 0 olgu; Grup K: 2 olgu). Akciğer rezistans, kompliansı, PaO2/PAO2 ve PaO2/FiO2 oranları, laktat düzeyleri ve hemodinamik değerler tüm ölçüm zamanlarında gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak farklılık göstermedi. Postoperatif kognitif fonksiyon bozukluğu traneksamik asit grubunda istatistiksel olarak daha fazla saptandı (Grup A: 0 olgu; Grup T: 6 olgu; Grup K: 2 olgu; p=0.044). Mortalite, yoğun bakım ve hastanede kalış süreleri yine gruplar arasında farklı değildi. Bu bulgular yüksek doz aprotinin ve traneksamik asidin miyokard üzerine ilave yararlı veya zararlı etkisinin olmadığını desteklemektedir. Yine KPB'a bağlı akciğerde oluşan değişiklikleri önlemede her iki ilacın ilave bir etkisini gözlemedik. Kognitif fonksiyon bozukluğu insidensi traneksamik asit tedavisiyle daha yüksek olduğu bulundu. Sonuç olarak kalp ameliyatlarında primer hemostatik amaçlı kullanılan aprotinin ve traneksamik asidin kalp, akciğer ve santral sinir sistemi üzerine ilave koruyucu etkisini gözlemlemezken traneksamik asit grubunda kognitif fonksiyon bozukluğunun daha sık olarak oluşması dikkat çekiciydi.

Aprotinin and tranexamic acid in coronary artery bypass surgery: II) The effects on myocardium, lung and central nervous system

The effects of aprotinin and tranexamic acid (TA), used mostly to reduce the blood loss on myocardium, lung and central nervous system were investigated and compared with control group in a prospective and randomized study following primary coronary artery bypass grafting. Sixty patients were allocated into three groups: aprotinin (total dose 6 x 10<sup>6</sup> KIU, n=20, Group A), TA (total 10 g, n=20 Group T), and nonmedicated controls (n=20, Group C). Myocardial enzymes (troponin I, creatine kinase isoenzyme (CKMB), SGOT, LDH), pulmonary compliance, resistance, PaO<sub>2</sub>/PAO<sub>2</sub> and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FIO<sub>2</sub>, lactate level and hemodynamics parameters were assessed before CPB (cardiopulmonary bypass) and following CPB in various periods. Postoperative mortality, cognitive dysfunction, stay in intensive care unit and hospital discharge times were recorded. Troponin I levels increased in the control group compared with the remaining two groups 6 hours after CPB but this increase was within normal ranges (Group A: 8.70±2.10; Group T: 11.80±1.80; Group K: 20.80±4.09 ng.mL<sup>-1</sup>; p=0.012). The incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction was similar in all groups (Group A: 1 patient; Group T: none; Group K: 2 patients). Pulmonary resistance, compliance, PaO<sub>2</sub>/PAO<sub>2</sub> and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> , lactate level and hemodynamic parameters were not statistically different after CPB. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction was statistically significant in Group T (Group A: none; Group T: 6 patients; Group C: 2 patients; p=0.044). Mortality, stay in intensive care unit and hospital discharge times were not different within the groups. Our results suggested that high dose aprotinin and TA had no additional benefit or harmful effect on myocardium. Also, we did not observe any additional positive effect to prevent CPB induced lung injury in both drugs. The cognitive dysfunction incidence was higher with TA therapy. In conclusion, for aprotinin and TA used for primary hemostasis in cardiac surgery, the additional protective effects on the heart, lung and central nervous system have not been confirmed, whereas for TA , cognitive dysfunction has been found to be strikingly more common.

___

  • 1. Hall RI, Smith MS Rocker G. The systemic inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: pathophysiological, therapeutic, and pharmacological considerations. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 766-82.
  • 2. Wan S, LeClerc JL, Vincent JL. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: Mechanisms involved and possible therapeutic strategies. Chest 1997; 112: 676-92.
  • 3. Miller BE, Levy JH. The inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vase Anesth 1997; 11: 355-66.
  • 4. Dietrich W, Spannagl M, Jochum M, et al. Influence of high-dose aprotinin treatment on blood loss and coagulation patterns in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. An-esthesiology 1990; 73: 1119-26.
  • 5. Blauhut B, Gross C, Necek S, Doran IE, Spaih P, Hansen PL, Effects of high-dose aprotinin on blood loss, platelet function, fibrinolysis, complement and renal function after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 101:958-67.
  • 6. Marx G, Pokar H, Reuter H, Doering V, Tilsner V. The effects of aprotinin on hemostatic function during cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vase Anesth 1991; 5: 467-74.
  • 7. Karski JM, Teasdale SJ, Norman P, et al. Prevention of bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass with high-dose tranexamic acid; Double blind, randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 110:835-42.
  • 8. Kwak YL, Nam SB, Kim MD, Bang SO, Hong YW. Effective regimen of tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss and homologous transfusion in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: SCA84.
  • 9. Soeparwata R, Hartman AR, Frenchman U, Stefano GB, Scheld HH, Bilfinger TV. Aprotinin diminishes inflammatory processes. Int J Card 1996 (suppl); 55: 26.
  • 10. Hill GE, Pohorecki R, Alonso A, Rennard SI, Robbins RA. Aprotinin reduces interleukin-8 production and lung neutroph-il accumulation after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg 1996:83:696-700.
  • 11. Takaori M, Fukui A, Kimura K, Mihira M, Fujiwara T. Effect of aprotinin on endothelial cell functions during cardiopulmonary bypass. Masui 1996; 45: 928-32.
  • 12. Wechsler D. WA1S-R Manual. San Antonio: Harcourt Brace Jovanivich, 1989.
  • 13. Cosgrove DM, Heric B, Lytle BW, et al. Aprotinin therapy for reoperative myocardial revascularization: A placebo-controlled study. Ann Thorac Surg 1992: 54: 1036-8.
  • 14. Sundt TM, Kouchoukos NT, Saffitz JE, Marphy SF, Wareing TH, Stahl DJ. Renal dysfunction and intravascular coagulation with aprotinin and hypothermic circulatory arrest. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 55: 1418-24.
  • 15. Royston D. Aprotinin versus lysine analogues: The debate continues. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65: S9-19.
  • 16. Böhrer H, Fleischer F, Lang J, Vahi C. Early formation of thrombi on pulmonary artery catheters in cardiac surgical patients receiving high-dose aprotinin. J Cardiothorac Anesth 1990; 4: 222-5.
  • 17. Gurevitch J, Barak J. Hochhauser E, Paz Y, Yakirevich V. Aprotinin improves myocardial recovery after ischemia and re-perfusion: Effects of the drug on isolated rat hearts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 108: 109-18.
  • 18. Ovrum E, Holen EA, Abdelnoor M, 0ystese R, Ringdal ML. Tranexamic acid (Cyklokapron) is not necessary to reduce blood loss after coronary artery bypass operations. 1 Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993; 105: 78-83.
  • 19. Broche VF, Suarez AR, Olembe E, et al. Aprotinin effects related to oxidadve stress in cardiosurgery with mechanical cardiorespiratory support. Annals of the New York Academy Sciences (abstract) 1996; 793: 521-4.
  • 20. Smith PL, Treasure T, Newman SP, et al. Cerebral consequences of cardiopulmonary bypass. Lancet 1986; I: 823-5.
  • 21. Shaw PJ, Bates D, Cartlidge NE, et al. Early intellectual dysfunction following coronary bypass surgery. Q J Med 1986; 58: 59-68.
  • 22. Hammeke TA, Hastings JE. Neuropsychologic alterations after cardiac operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988; 96: 326-31.
  • 23. Newman MF, Croughwell ND, Blumenthal JA, et al. Predictors of cognitive decline after cardiac operation. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59: 1326-30.
  • 24. Kamiya T, Katayama Y, Kashiwagi F, Terashi A. The role of bradykinin in mediating ischemic brain edema in rats. Stroke 1993; 24: 571-5.
Anestezi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0578
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1993
  • Yayıncı: Betül Kartal