Jinekolojik Cerrahide Taze Gaz Akımının Derlenme Ajitasyonu Üzerine Etkileri: Klinik Bir Çalışma

Amaç: Bu prospektif çalışma laparotomik jinekolojik cerrahi geçiren hastalarda düşük akımlı anestezinin (DAA) derlenme ajitasyonu üzerine etkisi olup olmadığını tespit etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yöntem: Bu prospektif randomize çalışmaya 64 hasta dahil edildi. Hastalar rastgele iki gruba ayrıldı: Grup 2 ve Grup 0,5. Taze gaz akımı (TGA) başlangıçta her iki grupta da 4 L dk-1 olarak ayarlandı. Tüm hastalarda sevofluran 1 minimum alveolar konsantrasyona ulaştığında TGA Grup 2 için 2 L dk-1 ve Grup 0,5 için 0,5 L dk-1’ye düşürüldü. Vaporizatör Grup 2’de cerrahi bitiminde kapatılırken, Grup 0,5’te cerrahi bitmeden 15 dakika önce kapatıldı. Cerrahi bittiğinde TGA 4 L dk-1’ye yükseltildi. Derlenme ajitasyonu postanestezi bakım ünitesinde 5, 10, 20 ve 30. dakikalarda Riker sedasyon ajitasyon skalası (SAS) kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Beş hastada derlenme ajitasyonu gözlendi ve gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak derlenme ajitasyonu açısından anlamlı fark saptanmadı. Tüm değerlendirme sürelerinde SAS=4 olan hasta sayısı Grup 0,5’te anlamlı olarak daha fazla iken SAS

The Effects of Fresh Gas Flow on Emergence Agitation for Gynecologic Surgery: A Clinical Study

low flow anesthesia (LFA) has an effect on emergence agitation in women who underwent laparotomic gynecologic surgeries. Method: Sixty four female patients were enrolled in this prospective randomized study. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Group 2 and Group 0.5. The fresh gas flow (FGF) rate was set at 4 L min-1 in both groups, initially. When all patients reached 1 minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane, the FGF rate was reduced to 2 L min-1 in Group 2 and 0.5 L min-1 in Group 0.5. For Group 0.5, vapor was closed 15 minutes before the end of surgery, while it was closed at the end of the operation for Group 2. At the end of the surgery, the FGF rate was increased to 4 L min-1. Emergence agitation was assessed using the Riker Sedation Agitation Scale (SAS) in the post-anesthesia care unit at 5, 10, 20 and 30th minutes. Results: Emergence agitation was observed in 5 patients, no significant difference was found between two groups. For all evaluation times, number of patients with SAS=4 was significantly higher in Group 0.5, while the number of patients with SAS

___

  • 1. Vlajkovic GP, Sindjelic RP. Emergence delirium in children: Many questions, few answers. Anesth Analg 2007;104(1):84- 91.
  • 2. Yu D, Chai W, Sun X, Yao L. Emergence agitation in adults: Risk factors in 2,000 patients. Can J Anesth 2010;57(9):843-8.
  • 3. Kim YS, Chae YK, Choi YS, et al. A comparative study of emergence agitation between sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia in adults after closed reduction of nasal bone fracture. Korean J Anesthesiol 2012;63(1):48-53.
  • 4. Upadya M, Saneesh PJ. Low-flow anaesthesia–underused mode towards “sustainable anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth 2018;62(3):166-72.
  • 5. Virtue RW. Minimal-flow nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1974;40(2):196-8.
  • 6. Baker AB. Back to basics-a simplified non-mathematical approach to low flow techniques in anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 1994;22(4):394-5.
  • 7. Brattwall M, Warren-Stomberg M, Hesselvik F, Jakobsson J. Brief review: Theory and practice of minimal fresh gas flow anesthesia. Can J Anesth 2012;59(8):785-97.
  • 8. Riker RR, Fraser GL, Cox PM. Continuous infusion of haloperidol controls agitation in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 1994;22(3):433-40.
  • 9. Dahmani S, Stany I, Brasher C, et al. Pharmacological prevention of sevoflurane-and desflurane-related emergence agitation in children: A meta-analysis of published studies. Br J Anaesth 2010;104(2):216-23.
  • 10. Singh R, Kharbanda M, Sood N, Mahajan V, Chatterji C. Comparative evaluation of incidence of emergence agitation and post-operative recovery profile in paediatric patients after isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth 2012;56(2):156-61.
  • 11. Cravero J, Surgenor S, Whalen K. Emergence agitation in paediatric patients after sevoflurane anaesthesia and no surgery: A comparison with halothane. Pediatr Anesth 2000;10(4):419-24.
  • 12. Talih G, Yüksek A, Şahin E. Evaluation of emergence agitation after general anaesthesia in rhinoplasty patients: Inhalation anaesthesia versus total intravenous anaesthesia. Am J Otolaryngol 2020;41(3):102387.
  • 13. Jo JY, Jung KW, Kim HJ et al. Effect of total intravenous anesthesia vs volatile induction with maintenance anesthesia on emergence agitation after nasal surgery: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;145(2):117-23.
  • 14. Kim JH. Mechanism of emergence agitation induced by sevoflurane anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol 2011;60(2):73- 4.
  • 15. Yang Y, Song T, Wang H, et al. Comparison of two different sevoflurane expelling methods on emergence agitation in infants following sevoflurane anesthesia. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8(4):6200-5.
Anestezi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0578
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1993
  • Yayıncı: Betül Kartal