EFFECTS OF USING PROPOFOL OR SEVOFLURANE FOR MAINTENANCE OF ANESTHESIA ON POSTOPERATIVE METABOLIC STATE IN BARIATRIC SURGERY

Cerrahi yöntem ve anestezinin obez hastaların postoperatif metabolik durumu üzerine değişen derecelerde etkisi mevcuttur.Bu çalışma ile intravenöz propofol infüzyonu ya da inhaler sevofluranla anestezi idamesinin obez hastalardaki metabolik sonuçlarınıaraştırdık.Yöntem: Ters trendelenburg pozisyonunda laparoskopik sleeve gastrektomi yöntemiyle yapılan 140 hastanın verileri çalışmaya dahiledildi. Birinci gruba idamede total intravenöz anestezi alanlar, ikinci gruba sevofluranla inhalasyon anestezisi alanlar dahil edildi.Her iki grupta da idamedeki ek ajan remifentanil idi. Her iki gruptaki hastaların demografik verileri, preoperatif ve postoperatif laboratuarincelemeleri, cerrahi süreleri, intraoperatif sıvı yönetimleri kaydedildi.Bulgular: Hastaların demografik verileri, cerrahi süreleri açısından gruplar arası farklılık tespit edilmedi. Propofol alan grupta daha çokmayi ihtiyacı olduğu tespit edildi. Her iki grupta da postoperatif AST, ALT değerleri preoperatif ölçümlerden yüksekti (p

BAR‹ATR‹K CERRAH‹DE PROPOFOL VEYA SEVOFLURAN ‹LE YAPILAN ANESTEZ‹ ‹DAMES‹N‹N POSTOPERAT‹F METABOL‹K DURUM ÜZER‹NE ETK‹LER‹

Surgical method and anesthesia have variable effects on postoperative metabolic state of the obese patients. In the currentstudy, we investigated metabolic consequences of maintenance of anesthesia with intravenous propofol infusion or inhaled sevoflurane inobese patients.Method: Data of 140 patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in reverse trendelenburg position were reviewed forthe study. The first group consisted of patients receiving total intravenous anesthesia for maintenance and the second group includedpatients receiving inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane. Remifentanil was the additional agent used for maintenance in both groups.Demographic data, pre and postoperative laboratory values, duration of operation and intraoperative fluid management were recordedfor two study groups.Results: Patients in Group propofol received higher intraoperative fluid replacement. Postoperative AST and ALT values were greaterthan preoperative values in both groups (p=0.0001). Postoperative PaCO2values were greater than preoperative values but remainedwithin physiological limits in both groups (p=0.0001). Compared to preoperative values, propofol group had greater postoperative CKand LDH and lower pH and HCO3values (p=0.0001). Postoperative ALT elevation was more severe in sevoflurane group versus propofolgroup but reductions in pH and HCO3were more significant in propofol group.Conclusion: Anesthesia has clear postoperative metabolic consequences in bariatric surgery. It should be kept in mind that propofolinfusion induces overt metabolic acidosis and sevoflurane can result in elevated liver enzymes and although these increases remain inphysiological limits, care should be taken when choosing drugs for patients who can not compensate such adverse effects

___

  • 1.Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic: report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000; 894:1-253.
  • 2.Poirier P, Alpert MA, Fleisher LA, et al. On behalf of the American Heart Association Obesity Committee of Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism, Council on Cardiopulmonary Perioperative and Critical Care, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Cardiovascular evaluation and management of severely obese patients undergoing surgery: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2009; 120: 86-95.
  • 3.Nguyen NT, Wolfe BM. The physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum in the morbidly obese. Annals of surgery 2005; 241: 219-226.
  • 4.Lindgren L, Koivusalo AM, Kellokumpu I. Conventional pneumoperitoneum compared with abdominal wall lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75: 567-572.
  • 5.Meininger D, Byhahn C, Bueck M, et al. Effects of prolonged pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamics and acid-base balance during totally endoscopic robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. World J Surg 2002; 26: 1423-1427.
  • 6.Fried M, Krska Z, Danzig V. Does the laparoscopic approach significantly affect cardiac functions in laparoscopic surgery? Pilot study in non-obese and morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg 2001; 11: 293-296.
  • 7.Westerband A, Van De Water JM, Amzallag M, et al. Cardiovascular changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992; 175: 535-538.
  • 8.Odeberg S, Ljungqvist O, Sevenberg T, et al. Haemodynamic effects of pneumoperitoneum and the influence of posture during anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994; 38: 276-283.
  • 9.Hirvonen EA, Poikolainen EO, Paakkonen ME, Nuutinen LS. The adverse hemodynamic effects of anesthesia, head-up tilt, and carbondioxide pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 272- 277.
  • 10.Jakimowics J, Stultiens G, Smulders F. Laparoscopic insufflation of the abdomen reduces portal venous flow. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 129-132.
  • 11.Halevy A, Gold-Deutch R, Negri M, et al. Are elevated liver enzymes and bilirubin levels significant after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the absence of bile duct injury? Ann Surg 1994; 219: 362-364.
  • 12.Nguyen NT, Braley S, Fleming NW, et al. Comparison of postoperative hepatic function after laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass. Am J Surg 2003; 186: 40-44.
  • 13.Gholam PM, Kotler DP, Flancbaum LJ. Liver pathology in morbidly obese patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg 2002; 12: 49-51.
  • 14.Spaulding L, Trainer T, Janiec D. Prevalence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in morbidly obese subjects undergoing gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2003; 13: 347-349.
  • 15.Chondrogiannis K, Hadziyannis E, Fassoulaki A. Propofol or sevoflurane anaesthesia does not affect hepatic integrity as assessed by the M30 & M65 cell death markers & liver enzymes. Indian J Med Res 2014; 140: 630-636.
  • 16.Fukuda H, Kawamoto M, Yuge O, Fujii K. A comparison of the effects of prolonged (> 10 hour) low-flow sevoflurane, high-flow sevoflurane, and low-flow isoflurane anaesthesia on hepatorenal function in orthopaedic patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 2004; 32: 210-218.
  • 17.Tiainen P, Lindgren L, Rosenberg PH. Disturbance of hepatocellular integrity associated with propofol anaesthesia in surgical patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 39: 840-844.
  • 18.Ray DC, Bomont R, Mizushima A, Kugimiya T, Howie A F, Beckett GJ. Effect of sevoflurane anaesthesia on plasma concentrations of glutathione S-transferase. BJA 1996; 77: 404-407.
  • 19.Higuchi H, Adachi Y, Wada H, Kanno M, Satoh T. Comparison of plasma α glutathione S-transferase concentrations during and after low-flow sevoflurane or isoflurane anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 1226-1229.
  • 20.Murray J M, Phillips A S, Fee JPH. Comparison of the effects of isoflurane and propofol on hepatic glutathione-S-transferase concentrations during and after prolonged anaesthesia. BJA 1994; 72: 599-601.
  • 21.Tiainen P, Lindgren L, Rosenberg P H. Disturbance of hepatocellular integrity associated with propofol anaesthesia in surgical patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 39: 840-844.
  • 22.Chen TL, Wu CH, Chen TG, Tai YT, Chang HC, Lin, CJ. Effects of propofol on functional activities of hepatic and extrahepatic conjugation enzyme systems. BJA 2000; 84: 771-776.
  • 23.Kneiseler G, Bachmann, HS, Bechmann, LP, et al. A rare case of propofol-induced acute liver failure and literature review. Case Rep Gastroenterol 2010; 4: 57-65.
  • 24.Nguyen HD, Borum ML. Acute hepatitis in a patient given propofol during colonoscopy. South Med J 2009; 102: 333-334.
  • 25.Polo-Romero F J, Paricio P, Tovar A, Alonso JM. Propofol-induced acute toxic hepatitis after brief sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 2008; 40: E49.
  • 26.Turillazzi E, D’errico S, Neri M, Riezzo I, Fineschi V. A fatal case of fulminant hepatic necrosis following sevoflurane anesthesia. Toxicologic Pathology 2007; 35: 780-785.
  • 27.Watanabe K, Hatakenaka S, Ikemune K, Chigyo Y, Kubozono T, Arai T. A case of suspected liver dysfunction induced by sevoflurane anesthesia. Masui. The Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology 1993; 42: 902-905.
  • 28.Topal A, Gül N, Ilçöl Y, Görgül OS. Hepatic effects of halothane, isoflurane or sevoflurane anaesthesia in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Medicine 2003; 50: 530-533.
  • 29.Singhal S, Gray T, Guzman G, Verma A, Anand K. Sevoflurane hepatotoxicity: a case report of sevoflurane hepatic necrosis and review of the literature. American Journal of Therapeutics 2010; 17: 219-222.
  • 30.Araki M, Inaba H, Kon S, Imai M, Mizuguchi T. Effects of volatile anesthetics on the calcium ionophore A23187-mediated alterationsin hepatic flow and metabolism in the perfused liver in fasted rats. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997; 41: 55-61.
  • 31.Nishio S, Takeda H, Yokoyama M. Changes in urinary output during laparoscopic adrenalectomy. British Journal of Urology 1999; 83: 944-947.
  • 32.Nguyen NT, Perez RV, Fleming N, et al. Effect of prolonged pneumoperitoneum on intraoperative urine output during laparoscopic gastric bypass. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2002; 195: 476-483.
  • 33.Youssef, T., Abd-Elaal, I., Zakaria, G., & Hasheesh, M. Bariatric surgery: Rhabdomyolysis after open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective study. International Journal of Surgery 2010; 8: 484-488.
  • 34.Papaioannou V, Dragoumanis C, Theodorou V, Pneumatikos, I. (2008). The propofol infusionsyndrome in intensive care unit: from patho-physiology to prophylaxis and treatment. Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica 2008; 59: 79-86.
Anestezi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0578
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1993
  • Yayıncı: Betül Kartal
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

PERKÜTAN NEFROLİTOTOMİ SIRASINDA MASİF İNTRAABDOMİNAL EKSTRAVAZASYON GELİŞEN ÇOCUK HASTADA ANESTEZİ YÖNETİMİ

Bilge KARABULUT, Sibel SAYDAM, Mine AKIN, Yeşim ŞENAYLI, Gülşen KESKİN

NONİYONİK KONTRAST MADDE (İOHEKSOL) İLE İLİŞKİLİ NADİR BİR KOMPLİKASYON: TOKSİK EPİDERMAL NEKROLİZİS

IŞIL BULUR, Ebru ÖZEN, Serdar EKEMEN, Yunus TÜRKMEN, Birgül Büyükkıdan YELKEN

MANAGEMENT OF DIFFICULT AIRWAY IN A PATIENT WITH MUCOPOLYSACCHARIDOSIS TYPE 6

Gökçen KÜLTÜROLU, Jülide ERGİL, Derya ÖZKAN, Aslı DÖNMEZ

HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ NÖROŞİRURJİ AMELİYATHANELERİNDE SERVİKAL PATOLOJİ NEDENİYLE AMELİYAT OLAN HASTALARDA HAVAYOLU YÖNETİMİNİN RETROSPEKTİF DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Ülkü AYPAR, FİLİZ ÜZÜMCÜGİL, ŞENNUR UZUN, Demet Başak ÖZKARAGÖZ

ATROPA BELLADONNA (GÜZEL AVRAT OTU) YAPRAKLARI PİŞİRİLİRSE NE OLUR?: ANTİKOLİNERJİK TOKSİK SENDROM OLGUSU

Filiz Banu ÇETİNKAYA ETHEMOLU, Gülsüm KAVALCI, Cengizhan EMRE, Cem AKMAN

GEBELİKTE OBSTETRİK DIŞI CERRAHİ GİRİŞİM İÇİN MİDHUMERAL BLOK UYGULAMASI

Deniz KIZILAY, Ayten SARAÇOLU, Olgaç BEZEN, İbrahim Haluk KAFALI

DEV SAKROKOKSİGEAL TERATOMLU YENİDOĞANDA ANESTEZİ YÖNETİMİ

Yeşim ŞENAYLI, Gülşen KESKİN, Mine AKIN

LOKAL ANESTEZİ VE İNTRAVENÖZ SEDOANALJEZİ ALTINDA PERKÜTAN VERTEBROPLASTİ VE BALON KİFOPLASTİ UYGULANAN OLGULARIN RETROSPEKTİF OLARAK DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

BAHATTİN TUNCALI, FARUK ALTINEL

NOONAN SENDROMU VE ANESTEZİ YÖNETİMİ

Selmin ÖKESLİ, Hacer ŞİMŞEK, Alev ERDOĞAN, RESUL YILMAZ

Arer ve ark: Dev inguinal herni ve anestezi yönetimi

İlker Murat ARER, Murat KUFİ, NEZİH AKKAPULU, ÖZLEM ÖZMETE, Hakan YABANOĞLU