D-8 Ülkelerinde Biyokütle Enerjisi Tüketimi ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki
Çalışmada,1980-2013 yılları arasında D-8 ülkeleri (Gelişen Sekiz Ülke) için biyokütleenerji tüketimi ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki ele alınmaktadır. Serilerarasında uzun dönem ilişkisi olup olmadığını analiz etmek için panel birim kök,eşbütünleşme ve nedensellik testleri kullanılmaktadır. Bu analizlerin sonucundadeğişkenler arasında uzun dönemli bir ilişkinin olduğu görülmektedir. Ardındaneşbütünleşik seriler OLS, DOLS ve FMOLS tahmincileri ile tahmin edilmekte vedaha sonra etki-tepki analizi yapılmaktadır. Elde edilen analiz sonuçlarınagöre, biyokütle enerji tüketimindenekonomik büyümeye doğru tek yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisi ortaya çıkmaktadır.Ayrıca, biyokütle enerji tüketimi ile ekonomik büyüme arasında uzun dönemdepozitif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmaktadır. Bu bağlamda,hükümetlerin biyokütle enerji kullanımına dönük yapılacak yatırım veprojelerinin ekonomik büyümeyi olumlu yönde etkileyeceği görülmektedir.
The Relationship Between Biomass Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in D-8 Countries
In the study, in the period of 1980-2013, the relationship between biomass energy consumption and economic growth in D-8 countries (Developing Eight Countries) is discussed. Panel unit root, cointegration and causality tests are used to analyze whether there is a long-term relationship between the series. As a result of these analyzes, it seems that there is a long-term relationship between the variables. The cointegrated series are then estimated by OLS, DOLS and FMOLS estimators and then impulse-response analysis is performed. According to the obtained analysis results, a one-way causality relationship occurs from biomass energy consumption to economic growth. In addition, there is a long-term positive and statistically significant relationship between biomass energy consumption and economic growth. In this context, it is seen that governments' investment and projects towards biomass energy use will affect economic growth positively.
___
- Altinay, G., & Karagol, E. (2004). Structural break, unit root,
and the causality between energy consumption and GDP
in Turkey. Energy Economics, 26(6), 985-994.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2004.07.001
- Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2010). Energy consumption and
growth in South America: Evidence from a panel error
correction model. Energy Economics, 32(6), 1421-1426.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.04.006
- Aslan, A. (2016). The causal relationship between biomass
energy use and economic growth in the United States.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 362–
366.
- Aydın, C., & Esen, O. (2016). Threshold effects of energy
consumption on economic growth in Turkey. Journal of
Environmental Management and Tourism, 7(3), 370-
382. http://dx.doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v7.3(15).02
- Aydın, C., & Esen, Ö. (2017). Does Too Much Energy
Consumption Harm Economic Growth for Turkish
Republics in The Transition Process? New Evidence on
Threshold Effects. International Journal of Energy
Economics and Policy, 7(2), 34-43.
- Aydın, F.F. (2013). CO 2 emissions, renewable energy
consumption, population density and economic growth in
G7 countries. The Journal of Knowledge Economy &
Knowledge Management, VIII(II), 89-104.
- Bhattacharya, M., Paramati, S.R., Ozturk, İ., &
Bhattacharya, S. (2016). The Effect of Renewable
Energy Consumption on Economic Growth: Evidence
from Top 38 Countries. Applied Energy, 162, 733-741.
- Bildirici, M. (2014). Relationship between biomass energy
and economic growth in transition countries: panel
ARDL approach. GCB Bioenergy, 6(6), 717–726.
- Bildirici, M. (2016). Biomass energy consumption and
economic growth: ARDL analysis, Energy Sources, Part
B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 11 (6), 562-568.
- Bildirici, M., & Özaksoy, F. (2016). Woody biomass energy
consumption and economic growth in Sub-Saharan
Africa. Procedia Economics and Finance, 38, 287–293.
- Bilgili, F., & Özturk, İ. (2015). Biomass energy and
economic growth nexus in G7 countries: Evidence from
dynamic panel data. Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews, 49, 132-138.
- Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests
for panel data. In Nonstationary Panels, Panel
Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels. Baltagi B. (ed.).
Advances in Econometrics 15 Amsterdam: JAI Press;
161–178.
- Dış İşleri Bakanlığı (2018). Gelişen Sekiz Ülke (D-8).
(Erişim Tarihi: 10.02.2018), http://www.mfa.gov.tr/
gelisen-sekiz-ulke-_d-8_.tr.mfa
- Dumitrescu, E.I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger
non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic
Modelling, 29 (4), 1450-1460.
- Esen, Ö., & Bayrak, M. (2017). Does more energy
consumption support economic growth in net energy-
importing countries?. Journal of Economics, Finance
and
Administrative
Science,
22(42),
75-98.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-01-2017-0015
- Herrerias, M. J., Joyeux, R., & Girardin, E. (2013). Short-
and long-run causality between energy consumption and
economic growth: Evidence across regions in
China. Applied Energy, 112, 1483-1492.
- Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit
roots in heterogeneous
panels.
Journal of
econometrics, 115(1), 53-74.
- Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests
in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample
properties. Journal of econometrics, 108(1), 1-24.
- Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of
unit root tests with panel data and a new simple
test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 61(S1),
631-652
- Menegaki, A. N., & Tugcu, C. T. (2017). Energy
consumption and Sustainable Economic Welfare in G7
countries; A comparison with the conventional
nexus. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69,
892-901.
- Menegaki, A.N. (2011). Growth and renewable energy in
Europe: A random effect model with evidence for
neutrality hypothesis. Energy Economics, 3(2), 257-263.
- Özşahin, Ş., Mucuk, M., & Gerçeker, M. (2016).
Yenilenebilir enerji ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki
ilişki: BRICS-T ülkeleri üzerine Panel ARDL analizi.
Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4
(4), 111-130.
- Payne, J.E. (2011). On biomass energy consumption and real
output in the US. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics,
Planning, and Policy, 6(1), 47-52.
- Sadorsky, P. (2009). Renewable energy consumption and
income in emerging economies. Energy Policy, 37 (10),
4021–4028.
- Shahbaz, M., Rasool, G., Ahmed, K., & Mahalik, M. K.
(2016). Considering the effect of biomass energy
consumption on economic growth: Fresh evidence from
BRICS region. Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews, 60, 1442-1450.
- Soytas, U., & Sari, R. (2003). Energy consumption and GDP:
causality relationship in G-7 countries and emerging
markets.
Energy
Economics,
25(1),
33-37.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(02)00009-9
- Stern, D. I. (2000). Multivariate Cointegration Analysis of
the Role of Energy in the US Macroeconomy. Energy
Economics,
22(2),
267–283.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(99)00028-6
- Yenilenebilir Enerji Genel Müdürlüğü (2017). Biyokütle
Enerjisi Nedir?. (Erişim Tarihi: 15.02.2017),
http://www.eie.gov.tr/yenilenebilir/biyokutle_enerjisi.as
px