Vücut kitle indeksi, testis hacmi, penis uzunluğu: Adölesan dönemi öncesi çocuklarda genel durumun yeniden gözden geçirilmesi

AMAÇ: Çalışmamızın amacı puberte öncesi çocuklarda yaşa göre penis boyu ve testis hacmi için referanslar elde etmek ve bu ölçümün puberte öncesi çocuklarda penis ve testis ölçümü açısından var olan standardizasyonlara katkı sağlamaktır. Ayrıca çocuklarda penis boyu ve testis hacminin çocuğun boyu, kilosu ve vücut kitle indeksi (VKİ) arasında ilişki olup olmadığını araştırmayı hedefledik. GEREÇ ve YÖNTEMLER: Kliniğimize başvuran 1201 çocuğun penis boyunu cetvelle ve testis hacmini ultrasonla ölçüp, bu değerleri çocu- ğun boyu, kilosu ve vücut kitle indeksi ile karşılaştırdık. Hastaların klinik bilgileri tıbbi kayıtları geriye dönük olarak incelenerek toplandı. Araştırma Kesitsel tipte bir çalışmadır. Tanımlayıcı istatistik olarak yüzde, ortalama ve standart sapma kullanılmıştır. Tek değişkenli analizlerde student t-testi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada SPSS 20.0 paket programı kullanılarak analizler yapılmıştır. BULGULAR: Araştırmaya katılanların ortalama yaşı 4,35±2,65 yıl, ortalama boy ölçümleri 104,23±22,61 cm, ortalama kilo ölçümleri 18,31±8,63 kg ve ortalama VKİ (vücut kitle indeksi) ölçümleri 16,06±2,64 kg/m²’dir. Yaş, boy, kilo ile VKİ değerleri arttıkça ortalama testis hacmi ve penis boyu artmaktadır (p

Body mass index, testicular volume, penile length: A review of the general situation in pre-adolescent children

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study is to obtain references for penile length and testicular volume according to age in prepubertal children and to contribute to the standardization of this measurement in terms of penis and testis measurement in prepubertal children. In addition, we aimed to investigate whether there is a relationship between penile length and testicular volume in children, height, weight and body mass index (BMI). MATRERIAL and METHODS:We measured the penile length with a ruler and the testicular volume with ultrasound in 1201 children who applied to our clinic, and compared these values with the child’s height, weight and body mass index. The research is a cross-sectional study. Percentage, mean and standard deviation were used as descriptive statistics. Student t-test was used for univariate analyses. In the study, analyses were made using the SPSS 20.0 package program. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants in the study was 4.35±2.65 years, average height measurements were 104.23±22.61 cm, average weight measurements were 18.31±8.63 kg, and average BMI (body mass index) measurements were 16.06±2.64 kg/m². As age, height, weight and BMI values increase, mean testicular volume and penile length increase (p

___

  • Wiygul J, Palmer LS. Micropenis. ScientificWorldJournal. 2011;11:1462–9. [CrossRef]
  • Schonfeld WA. Primary and secondary sexual characteristics. Am J Dis Child. 1943;65:535–49. [CrossRef]
  • Habous M, Muir G, Soliman T, Farag M, Williamson B, Binsaleh S, et al. Outcomes of variation in technique and variation in accuracy of measurement in penile length measurement. Int J Impot Res,. 2018;30:21–6. [CrossRef]
  • Fuse H, Takahara M, Ishii H, Sumiya H, Shimazaki J. Measurement of testicular volume by ultrasonography. Int J Androl. 1990;13:267–272. [CrossRef]
  • Diamond DA, Paltiel HJ, DiCanzio J, Zurakowski D, Bauer SB, Atala A, et al. Comparative assessment of pediatric testicular volume: orchidometer versus ultrasound. J Urol. 2000;164:1111–4.
  • Veale D, Miles S, Read J, Troglia A, Carmona L, Fiorito C, et al. Phenomenology of men with body dysmorphic disorder concerning penis size compared to men anxious about their penis size and to controls: a cohort study. Body Image. 2014;13:53–61. [CrossRef]
  • Wylie KR, Eardley I. Penile size and the ‘small penis syndrome’. BJU Int. 2007;99:1449–55. [CrossRef]
  • Greenstein A, Dekalo S, Chen J. Penile size in adult menrecommendations for clinical and research measurements. Int J Impot Res. 2020;32:153–8. [CrossRef]
  • Schonfeld WA, Beebe G. Normal growth and variation in the male genitalia from birth to maturity. J Urol. 1942;48:759–62. [CrossRef]
  • Chung KH, Choi H, Kim SW. Penile and testicular sizes of Korean children. Korean J Urol. 1987;28:255–8. https://www.koreamed. org/SearchBasic.php?RID=1912492
  • Tuladhar R, Davis PG, Batch J, Doyle LW. Establishment of a normal range of penile length in preterm infants. J Paediatr Child Health. 1998;34:471–3. [CrossRef]
  • Camurdan AD, Oz MO, Ilhan MN, Camurdan OM, Sahin F, Beyazova U. Current stretched penile length: cross-sectional study of 1040 healthy Turkish children aged 0 to 5 years. Urology. 2007;70:572–5. [CrossRef]
  • Cinaz P, Yesilkaya E, Onganlar YH, Boyraz M, Bideci A, Camurdan O, Karaoğlu AB. Penile anthropometry of normal prepubertal boys in Turkey. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101:e33–6. [CrossRef]
  • Akyüz O. A new perspective on penis length measurement in children: How healthy are the results obtained with the current techniques? Andrologia. 2020;52:e13864. [CrossRef]
  • Taskinen S, Taavitsainen M, Wikström S. Measurement of testicular volume: comparison of 3 different methods. J Urol. 1996;155:930–933. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8583610/
  • Oehme NHB, Roelants M, Bruserud IS, Eide GE, Bjerknes R, Rosendahl K, Júlíusson PB. Ultrasound-based measurements of testicular volume in 6- to 16-year-old boys – intra- and interobserver agreement and comparison with Prader orchidometry. Pediatr Radiol. 2018;48:1771–8. [CrossRef]
  • Ogundoyin OO, Atalabi OM. Comparison between testicular volumes as measured with prader orchidometer and ultrasonography in Healthy Nigerian Newborns. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2018;15:93–6. [CrossRef]
  • Handelsman DJ, Staraj S. Testicular size: the effects of aging, malnutrition, and illness. J Androl. 1985;6:144–51. [CrossRef]
  • Srinivas R, Thomas RJ, Sebastian T, Kurian JJ. Testicular volume in a cohort of prepubertal Indian children. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2008;24:192–6. [CrossRef]
  • Kuijper EA, van Kooten J, Verbeke JI, van Rooijen M, Lambalk CB. Ultrasonographically measured testicular volumes in 0- to 6-year-old boys. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:792–6. [CrossRef]