CAVİT CEYLAN, ŞENOL TONYALI, Serkan DOĞAN, Sedat YAHŞİ, Emre UZUN

Türk toplumundaki yaşlı erkeklerde işeme pozisyonunun işeme sonrası rezidüel idrar hacmi üzerine etkisi

AMAÇ: Türk toplumundaki erkeklerde işeme pozisyonunun işeme sonrası idrar miktarı [post-voiding rezidü (PVR)] üzerine etkisini araştırmak. GEREÇ ve YÖNTEM: 2017–2018 yıllarında alt üriner sistem semptomu (AÜSS) ile polikliniğe başvuran ve PSA yüksekliği nedeni ile ultrasonografi eşliğinde transrektal iğne biyopsisi (TRİB) planlanan hastalar çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların demografik bilgileri, üroflowmetri parametreleri [maksimum idrar akım hızı (Q max), ortalama idrar akım hızı (Q ortalama), transrektal ultrasonografide prostat hacimleri ve PVR değerleri kayıt edildi. Hastalar işeme alışkanlığına göre iki gruba ayrıldı: Grup 1=Ayakta işeme alışkanlığı olan hastalar; Grup 2=Çömelerek işeme alışkanlığı olan hastalar. BULGULAR: Çalışmaya toplam 88 hasta dahil edildi. İki grubun karşılaştırılmasında sırasıyla PSA düzeyleri, prostat hacimleri, üroflowmetride işenen hacim, Q max, Q ort ve PVR açısından anlamlı fark saptanmadı (p=0,993, p=0,887, p=0,449, p=0,093, P=0,209, p=0,063). Yaş ve prostat hacmi ile PVR arasında istatiksel olarak güçlü bir korelasyon gösterildi (p

The effect of voiding position on post-voiding residue in aging men in turkish society

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of voiding position on postvoiding residue (PVR) in male Turkish population. MATERIAL and METHODS: Patients who were admitted to the outpatient clinic with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in 2017–2018 and who were scheduled for ultrasound-guided transrectal needle biopsy (TRIB) due to PSA elevation were included in the study. Demographic information, uroflowmetry parameters [maximal urinary flow rate (Q max), mean urinary flow rate (Q mean)], prostate volumes in transrectal ultrasound were recorded. The patients were divided into two groups according to their habit of voiding: Group 1=Patients voiding at standing-up position; Group 2=Patients voiding at squatting position. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients were included in the study. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of PSA levels, prostate volumes, voided volume, Q max, Q average and PVR (p=0.993, p=0.887, p=0.449, p=0.093, P=0.209, p=0.063). There was a statistically significant correlation between age and prostate volume and PVR (p

PDF

___

Claridge M. The physiology of micturition. Br J Urol 1965;37:620-3.
Fry C. The physiology of micturition. Women’s Health Med 2005;2:53–5. [CrossRef]
Aghamir SM, Mohseni M, Arasteh S. The effect of voiding position on uroflowmetry findings of healthy men and patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol J 2005;2:216–21.
Yamanishi T, Yasuda K, Sakakibara R, Hattori T, Minamide M, Yuki T, Ito H. Variation in urinary flow according to voiding position in normal males. Neurourol Urodyn 1999;18:553–7. [CrossRef]
Ünsal A, Çimentepe E. Voiding position does not affect uroflowmetric parameters and post-void residual urine volume in healthy volunteers. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2004;38:469–71. [CrossRef]
Goel A, Kanodia G, Sokhal AK, Singh K, Agrawal M, Sankhwar S. Evaluation of Impact of Voiding Posture on Uroflowmetry Parameters in Men. World J Mens Health 2017;35:100–6. [CrossRef]
Lepor H. Pathophysiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia in the aging male population. Rev Urol 2005;7 Suppl 4:S3-S12.
Oelke M, Hofner K, Jonas U, de la Rosette JJ, Ubbink DT, Wijkstra H. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive tests to evaluate bladder outlet obstruction in men: detrusor wall thickness, uroflowmetry, postvoid residual urine, and prostate volume. Eur Urol 2007;52:827–34. [CrossRef]
Ho LY, Chu PS, Consigliere DT, Zainuddin ZM, Bolong D, Chan CK, et al. Symptom prevalence, bother, and treatment satisfaction in men with lower urinary tract symptoms in Southeast Asia: a multinational, cross-sectional survey. World J Urol 2018;36:79– 86. [CrossRef]
Choudhury S, Agarwal MM, Mandal AK, Mavuduru R, Mete UK, Kumar S, Singh SK. Which voiding position is associated with lowest flow rates in healthy adult men? role of natural voiding position. Neurourol Urodyn 2010;29:413–7. [CrossRef]
Riehmann M, Bayer WH, Drinka PJ, Schultz S, Krause P, Rhodes PR, et al. Position-related changes in voiding dynamics in men. Urology 1998;52:625–30. [CrossRef]
Yazici CM, Turker P, Dogan C. Effect of voiding position on uroflowmetric parameters in healthy and obstructed male patients. Urol J 2014;10:1106–13.