___

• Rotker K, Sigman M. Recurrent varicocele. Asian J Androl 2016;18:229–33. [CrossRef]
• Steeno O, Knops J, Declerck L, Adimoelja A, van de Voorde H. Prevention of fertility disorders by detection and treatment of varicocele at school and college age. Andrologia 1976;8:47–53.
• Greenberg SH, Lipshultz LI, Wein AJ. Experience with 425 subfertile male patients. J Urol 1978;119:507–10.
• Jungwirth A, Diemer T, Kopa Z, Krausz C, Tournaye H. EAU Guidelines on Male Infertility. European Association of Urology; 2017. Erişim: https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/17-MaleInfertility_2017_web.pdf
• Cayan S, Kadioglu TC, Tefekli A, Kadioglu A, Tellaloglu S. Comparison of results and complications of high ligation surgery and microsurgical high inguinal varicocelectomy in the treatment of varicocele. Urology 2000;55:750–4.
• Watanabe M, Nagai A, Kusumi N, Tsuboi H, Nasu Y, Kumon H. Minimal invasiveness and effectivity of subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a comparative study with retroperitoneal high and laparoscopic approaches. Int J Urol 2005;12:892–8. [CrossRef]
• Ghanem H, Anis T, El-Nashar A, Shamloul R. Subinguinal microvaricocelectomy versus retroperitoneal varicocelectomy: comparative study of complications and surgical outcome. Urology 2004;64:1005–9. [CrossRef]
• Yavetz H, Levy R, Papo J, Yogev L, Paz G, Jaffa AJ, Homonnai ZT. Efficacy of varicocele embolization versus ligation of the left internal spermatic vein for improvement of sperm quality. Int J Androl 1992;15:338–44.
• Goldstein M, Gilbert BR, Dicker AP, Dwosh J, Gnecco C. Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparing technique. J Urol 1992;148:1808–11.
• Jungwirth A, Gögüs C, Hauser G, Gomahr A, Schmeller N, Aulitzky W, Frick J. Clinical outcome of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in infertile men. Andrologia 2001;33:71–4.
• Mehan DJ, Andrus CH, Parra RO. Laparoscopic internal spermatic vein ligation: report of a new technique. Fertil Steril 1992;58:1263–6.
• Enquist E, Stein BS, Sigman M. Laparoscopic versus subinguinal varicocelectomy: a comparative study. Fertil Steril 1994;61:1092–6.
• Jarow JP, Assimos DG, Pittaway DE. Effectiveness of laparoscopic varicocelectomy. Urology 1993;42:544–7.
• Milad MF, Zein TA, Hussein EA, Ayyat FM, Schneider MP, Sant GR. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy for infertility. An initial report from Saudi Arabia. Eur Urol 1996;29:462–5.
• Nabi G, Asterlings S, Greene DR, Marsh RL. Percutaneous embolization of varicoceles: outcomes and correlation of semen improvement with pregnancy. Urology 2004;63:359–63. [CrossRef]
• Ding H, Tian J, Du W, Zhang L, Wang H, Wang Z. Open non-microsurgical, laparoscopic or open microsurgical varicocelectomy for male infertility: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BJU Int 2012;110:1536–42. [CrossRef]
• Franco G, Iori F, de Dominicis C, Dal Forno S, Mander A, Laurenti C. Challenging the role of cremasteric reflux in the pathogenesis of varicocele using a new venographic approach. J Urol 1999;161:117–21.
• Mirilas P, Mentessidou A. Microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in children, adolescents, and adults: surgical anatomy and anatomically justified technique. J Androl 2012;33:338–49. [CrossRef]
• Bähren W, Lenz M, Porst H, Wierschin W. Side effects, complications and contraindications for percutaneous sclerotherapy of the internal spermatic vein in the treatment of idiopathic varicocele. Rofo 1983;138:172–9. [CrossRef]
• Çayan S, Akbay E. Fate of recurrent or persistent varicocele in the era of assisted reproduction technology: microsurgical subinguinal redo varicocelectomy versus observation. J Urol 2017;197:e1343. [CrossRef]
• Cil AS, Bozkurt M, Kara Bozkurt D, Gok M. Investigating the relationship between persistent reflux flow on the first postoperative day and recurrent varicocele in varicocelectomy patients. J Clin Med Res 2015;7:29–32. [CrossRef]
• Cvitanic OA, Cronan JJ, Sigman M, Landau ST. Varicoceles: postoperative prevalence –a prospective study with color Doppler US. Radiology 1993;187:711–4. [CrossRef]
• Cayan S, Erdemir F, Ozbey I, Turek PJ, Kadioğlu A, Tellaloğlu S. Can varicocelectomy significantly change the way couples use assisted reproductive technologies? J Urol 2002;167:1749–52.
• EAU Guideline: Male Infertility 2018.
• Tefekli A, Cayan S, Uluocak N, Poyanli A, Alp T, Kadioğlu A. Is selective internal spermatic venography necessary in detecting recurrent varicocele after surgical repair? Eur Urol 2001;40:404–8.
• Grober ED, Chan PT, Zini A, Goldstein M. Microsurgical treatment of persistent or recurrent varicocele. Fertil Steril 2004;82:718–22. [CrossRef]
• Gökçe A, Direk HC, Erdik A. Nüks varikosel tedavisinde mikrocerrahi varikoselektomi. Androl Bul 2017;19:40–3. [CrossRef]
• Galfano A, Novara G, Iafrate M, Fracalanza S, Novella G, Cavalleri S, et al. Surgical outcomes after modified antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy: a prospective analysis of 700 consecutive patients with idiopathic varicocele. J Urol 2008;179:1933–7. [CrossRef]
• Feneley MR, Pal MK, Nockler IB, Hendry WF. Retrograde embolization and causes of failure in the primary treatment of varicocele. Br J Urol 1997;80:642–6.
• Chen SS. Predictive factors of successful redo varicocelectomy in infertile patients with recurrent varicocele. Andrologia 2014;46:738–43. [CrossRef]