Meranın besin değerine dayalı gübrelemenin ekonomik analizi: Yeni bir görüş
Mera iyileştirme uygulamaları ile ilgili kavramlar, sosyal ve çevresel etkilerin yanında üretim ve ekonomikliği de kapsamaktadır. Mineral gübrelemesi, meraların verimliliğini arttırabilse de, gübre uygulama maliyetindeki artış nedeniyle üretim maliyeti artabilir ve sonuç olarak, net fayda azalabilir. Çalışmada, bozulmuş merada N (0, 60 ve 120 kg ha-1), P (0, 60 ve 120 kg ha-1) ve K (0 ve 80 kg ha-1) gübre (NPK) uygulamasının ekonomik hususlarını vurgulamak için i) kuru ot verimi (KOV), ii) tüketilen ham proteinin et ırkı sığırlarda can ağırlığa dönüşüm oranı (HPD) ve iii) yeni bir analiz modeli olarak verim ve nispi yem değeri (NYD) endeksi esasına dayalı toplam gelirleri esas alan üç ekonomik analiz modeli (EAM) arasındaki farklılıklar incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla, bozulmuş bir meranın gübreleme ile verimliliğini artırmak için yürütülen bir araştırmaya ait bir dizi veriler analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, en çok 'gelir' değişkeni bakımından farklılık göstermiş ve bu farklılığın, üç EAM’ın da gelirleri farklı şekillerde tahmin ettiği gerçeğinden kaynaklandığı belirlenmiştir. Farklı gelir ölçümleri nedeniyle, HPD, en yüksek net kara sahip olurken, KOV en düşük değere sahip olmuştur. KOV ve yeni bir görüş olarak NYD esaslı EAM, NPK gübreleri ile hayvansal üretim için kârlı olacak kadar kaba yem üretilemediğini göstermiştir. Bu çalışma, bir EAM' nin bir diğerine üstünlüğünü göstermek yerine, farklı verilerle ilgili modelleri incelemekte ve net faydada belirli bir artış elde etmek için EAM' lerin temel özelliklerini açıklamaktadır.
Economic analysis of fertilization based on nutritional value of rangeland: A new opinion
Concepts behind the best management practices of rangeland improvement include production, economics, as well as social and environmental aspects. Although revenue in rangelands can be increased by fertilization, total production cost can increase and as a result, net benefit may reduce due to increase in fertilizer application cost. This study examined differences between three economic analysis models (EAM): total revenue based on i) hay yield (HY), ii) conversion rate of consumable crude protein to meat on the hoof in cow-calf (CPM) and iii) yield and relative feed value (RFV) index as a new opinion to highlight the economic aspects related to the N (0, 60 and 120 kg ha-1), P (0, 60 and 120 kg ha-1) and K (0 and 80 kg ha-1) fertilization (NPK) in degraded rangelands. For this purpose, a series of data, gathered from an experiment conducted to increase the productivity of degraded rangelands by fertilization were analyzed. The results were most dissimilar for ‘the revenue’ variable and this difference lies in the fact that the EAMs estimated income in different ways. Due to the different revenue measurements, net benefit of CPM was the highest, while that of HY was the lowest. The HAY and RFV models indicate that NPK fertilizers did not increase forage production enough to be profitable for animal production. This study does not strive to suggest one EAM over another; however, it examines the respective models concerning various data and describes underlying characteristics of EAMs to obtain a given increase in net benefit.
___
- Adjesiwor, A.T., Islam, M.A., Zheljazkov, V.D., Ritten, J.P.,
Garcia y Garcia, A., 2017. Grass-legume seed mass
ratios and nitrogen rates affect forage accumulation,
nutritive value, and profitability. Crop Science, 57(5):
2852-2864.
- Algan, D., Aydın, İ., Olfaz, M., 2017. Nutritive value of
rangeland in the grazing maturity on the family basis
(in Turkish). Anadolu Journal of Agricultural
Sciences, 32(3): 367-373
- Amiri, F., Shariff, A.R.B.M., 2012. Comparison of nutritive
values of grasses and legume species using forage
quality index. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and
Technology, 34(5): 577-586.
- Anderson, P.M.L., Hoffman, M.T., 2007. The impacts of sustained heavy grazing on plant diversity and
composition in lowland and upland habitats across the
Kamiesberg mountain range in the Succulent Karoo,
South Africa. Journal of Arid Environments, 70(4):
686-700.
- Aydın, İ., Olfaz, M., Algan, D., 2016. Effects of some
improvement procedures on potantial disease risks
caused by yield, botanical composition and mineral
balance of natural ranges (in Turkish). The Scientific
and Technological Research Council of Turkey,
TOVAG - 112O742 (Final Report), Samsun.
- Aydin, I., Uzun, F., 2005. Nitrogen and phosphorus
fertilization of rangelands affects yield, forage quality
and botanical composition. European Journal of
Agronomy, 23(1): 8-14.
- Balabanli, C., Albayrak, S., Yuksel, O., 2010. Effects of
nitrogen phosphorus and potassium fertilization on the
quality and yield of native rangeland. Turkish Journal
of Field Crops, 15(2): 164-168.
- Brum, O.B., López, S., García, R., Andrés, S., Calleja, A.,
2009. Influence of harvest season, cutting frequency
and nitrogen fertilization of mountain meadows on
yield, floristic composition and protein content of
herbage. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 38(4): 596-
604.
- du Toit, J.C.O., 2014. Growth and tiller production of
Themeda triandra as affected by NPK fertilisation.
African Journal of Range and Forage Science, 31(3):
229-232.
- du Toit, J.T., Cross, P.C., Valeix, M., 2017. Managing the
Livestock–Wildlife Interface on Rangelands. In
Rangeland Systems. Springer International Publishing.
pp. 395-425.
- Frame J., Laidlaw, A.S., 2011. Improved grassland
management, 2nd ed. The Crowood Press Ltd., p. 352
Ramsbury, UK.
- Gentner, B., Tanaka, J.A., 2002. Classifying federal public
land grazing permittees. Journal of Range
Management, 55(1): 2-11.
- Guevara, J.C., Carlos, R.S., Oscar, R.E., Le Houerou, H.N.,
2000. N and P fertilization on rangeland production in
Midwest Argentina. Journal of Range Management,
53(4): 410-414.
- Interrante, S.M., Biermacher, J.T., Kering, M.K., Butler, T.J.,
2012. Production and economics of steers grazing tall
fescue with annual legumes or fertilized with nitrogen.
Crop Science, 52(4): 1940-1948.
- Islam, M.A., Adjesiwor, A.T., 2005. Grass, legumes, and
grass-legume mixtures: yield, nutritive value, and soil
water use. Western Alfalfa&Forage Symposium.
Reno,
Nevada.
http://alfalfa.ucdavis.edu/
+symposium/Islam.pdf (Accessed: 5 June 2017).
- Koc, A., Kaya, A., Gullap, M.K., Erkovan, H.I., Macit, M.,
Karaoglu, M., 2014. The effect of supplemental
concentrate feed on live weight gain of yearling
heifers over grazing season in subirrigated rangelands
of East Anatolia. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and
Animal Sciences, 38(4): 278-284.
- Kohestani, N., Yeganeh, H. 2016. Study the effects of range
management plans on vegetation of summer
rangelands of Mazandaran province Iran. Journal of
Rangeland Science, 6(3): 195-204.
- Kowaljow, E., Mazzarino, M.J., Satti, P., Jiménez-Rodríguez,
C., 2010. Organic and inorganic fertilizer effects on a
degraded Patagonian rangeland. Plant and Soil, 332(1-
2): 135-145.
- Kroeger, T., Casey, F., Alvarez, P., Cheatum, M., Tavassoli,
L., 2009. An economic analysis of the benefits of
habitat conservation on California rangelands.
Conservation economics white paper. Conservation
Economics Program, p. 91. Washington, DC:
Defenders of Wildlife.
- Louhaichi, M., Salkini, A.K., Petersen, S.L., 2009. Effect of
small ruminant grazing on the plant community
characteristics of semiarid Mediterranean ecosystems.
International Journal of Agriculture and Biology,
11(6): 681-689.
- Manyeki, J.K., Kirwa, E.C., Ogillo, P.B., Mnene, W.N.,
Kimitei, R., Mosu, A., Ngetich, R., 2015. Economic
analysis of natural pasture rehabilitation through
reseeding in the southern rangelands of Kenya.
Livestock Research for Rural Development. 27:49.
http://www.lrrd.org, (Accessed: 2 February 2018).
- Newman, Y.C., Adesogan, A.T., Vendramini, J., Sollenberger,
L., 2014. Defining forage quality. UF/IFAS Extension,
SS-AGR-322. pp. 1-5.
- Nohong, B., Ako, A., 2016. Raising, sustaining productivity
and quality in mixtures imperata Cylindrica-
Stylosanthes Guyanensis pastures with phosphorus
fertilization and defoliation management. American
Scientific Research Journal for Engineering,
Technology, and Sciences 16(1): 66-73.
- NRC, 2000. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle (7th Ed.).
National Academy Press, p. 248 Washington, D.C.
doi:10.17226/9791.
- Polat, T., Bükün, B., Okant, M., 2007. Dose response effect of
nıtrogen and phosphorus on forage qualıty, yıeld and
economıc return of rangelands. Pakistan Journal of
Botany, 39(1): 151-160.
- Rubio, H.O., Wood, M.K., Gomez, A., Reyes, G., 1996.
Native forage quality, quantity, and profitability as
affected by fertilization in northern Mexico. Journal of
Range Management, 49(4): 315-319.
- Şahinoğlu, O., Uzun, F., 2016. Efficiency of different methods
in improvement of base rangeland: I. Agronomic
Traits (in Turkish). Anadolu Journal of Agricultural
Sciences, 31(3): 423-432.
- Samuel, M.J., Hart, R.H., 1998. Nitrogen fertilization,
botanical composition and biomass production on
mixed-grass
rangeland.
Journal
of
Range
Management, 51(4): 408-416.
- Snyman, H.A., 2005. Rangeland degradation in a semi-arid
South Africa-I: influence on seasonal root distribution,
root/shoot ratios and water-use efficiency. Journal of
Arid Environments, 60(3): 457-481.
- Torell, L.A., Rimbey, N.R., Tanaka, J.A., Taylor, D.T.,
Wulfhorst, J.D., 2014. Ranch-level economic impact
analysis for public lands: A guide to methods, issues,
and applications. Journal of Rangeland Applications,
1: 1-13.
- Unterschultz, J.R., Miller, J., Boxall, P.C., 2004. The on-ranch
economics of riparian zone cattle grazing
management. Environmental Management, 33(5):
664-676.
- Uzun, F., Ocak, N., Şenel, M.Z., Karadağ, Y., 2016. The rates
of desirable grazing plant species in rangelands: Effect
of different animal species and grazing pressures.
Options Méditerranéennes. Série A, Séminaires
Méditerranéens, A114, pp. 83-86.
- Workman, J.P., Tanaka, J.A., 1991. Economic feasibility and
management considerations in range revegetation.
Journal of Range Management, 44(6): 566-573.