Perioperatif Antimikrobiyal Profilaksi Uygulamalarında Rehberlere Uyum: Çok Merkezli Bir Çalışma

Amaç: Bu çalışmada perioperatif antimikrobiyal profilaksi (PAP) uygulamalarında güncel rehberlere uyum oranlarını ve bu oranları etkileyen faktörleri belirlemeyi amaçladık.Gereç ve Yöntemler: 30 Mayıs - 30 Haziran 2013 tarihleri arasında 15 farklı merkezde uygulanan ankete yedi farklı branştan 410 cerrah katıldı. Çoktan seçmeli ve açık uçlu 40 soru içeren anketler yüz yüze görüşme yöntemiyle uygulandı. Bulgular: Katılımcıların ortalama yaşı 38,01±9,1, %83,4'ü erkek idi. Ankete katılan cerrahların %46,2'si "kurumlarında cerrahi profilaksi rehberi varlığı hakkında bilgisi olmadığını," %34'ü ise "rehberin bulunduğunu ve profilaksi uygulamalarının rehbere uygun olduğunu" belirtti. Ankete katılan cerrahların %56,1'inin kurum içinde cerrahi profilaksi konusunda herhangi bir eğitim toplantısına katılmadığı, son üç yıl içinde cerrahi profilaksi eğitimi alanlarda rehbere uyumun istatistiksel olarak daha yüksek olduğu belirlendi (p

Compliance with Guidelines for Practices of Perioperative Antimicrobial Prophylaxis: A Multicenter Survey

Aim: We aimed to determine the rates of compliance with current guidelines for practices of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis (PAP) and the factors affecting these rates.Materials and Methods: Four hundred and ten surgeons from seven different branches attended the survey conducted between May 30 and June 30, 2013, in fifteen different centers. A 40-question questionnaire consisting of multiple choice and open-ended questions was prepared and applied by interviewing the surgeons. Results: The mean age was 38.01 ± 9.1 years; and 83.4% of the participants were male. Of the surveyed surgeons 46.2% stated that they had no information about the existence of any guidelines for surgical prophylaxis in their institutions and 34% stated that institutional guidelines were available and their prophylaxis practices were in accordance with them. Surgeons who were trained on surgical prophylaxis within the last three years were found to have a statistically higher (p

PDF

___

1. Hoşoglu S, Aslan S, Akalın S, Boşnak V. Audit of quality of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis. Pharm World Sci. 2009;31:14-7.
2. Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK ve ark. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70:195-283.
3. Tourmousoglou CE, Yiannakopoulou E, Kalapothaki V, Bramis J, St Papadopoulos J. Adherence to guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in general surgery: a critical appraisal. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61:214-8.
4. Al-Momany NH, Al-Bakri AG, Makahleh ZM, Wazaify MM. Adherence to international antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in cardiac surgery: a Jordanian study demonstrates need for quality improvement. J Manag Care Pharm. 2009;15:262-71.
5. Ozgün H, Ertugrul BM, Soyder A, Ozturk B, Aydemir M. Peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis: adherence to guidelines and effects of educational intervention. Int J Surg. 2010;8:159-63.
6. Classen DC, Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Horn SD, Menlove RL, Burke JP. The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:281-6.
7. Harbarth S, Samore MH, Lichtenberg D, Carmeli Y. Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis after cardiovascular surgery and its effect on surgical site infections and antimicrobial resistance. Circulation. 2000;101:2916-21.
8. Özkurt Z, Kadanalı A, Ertek M, Erol S, Parlak M. Antibiotic use in surgical prophylaxis. J Ankem. 2005;19:111-4.
9. Özgün H, Ertugrul BM, Soyder A, Öztürk B, Aydemir M. Peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis: adherence to guidelines and effects of educational intervention. Intern J Surg. 2010;8:159-63.
10. Lallemand S, Thouverez M, Bailly P, Bertrand X, Talon D. Non-observance of guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical-site infections. Pharm World Sci. 2002;24:95-9.
11. Mannien J, van Kasteren ME, Nagelkerke NJ, Gyssens IC, Kullberg BJ, Wille JC ve ark. Effect of optimized antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of surgical site infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27:1340-6.
12. Yalcin AN, Erbay RH, Serin S, Atalay H, Oner O, Yalcin AD. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and cost in a Turkish University Hospital. Infez Med. 2007;15:99-104.
13. Kaya S, Aktaş S, Şenbayrak S, Tekin R, Öztoprak N, Aksoy F ve ark. An evaluation of surgical prophylaxis procedures in Turkey: a multi-center point prevalence study. Eurasian J Med. 2016;48:24-8.
14. Hoşoğlu S, Sünbül M, Erol S, Altındiş M, Çaylan R, Demirdağ K ve ark. A national survey of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in Turkey. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003;24:758-61.
15. Kulkarni R, Kochhar P, Dargude V, Rajadhyakshya S, Thatte U. Patterns of antimicrobial use by surgeons in India. Indian J Surg. 2005;67:308-15.
16. Gyssens IC, Geerligs IE, Dony JM, van der Vliet JA, van Kampen A, van den Broek PJ ve ark. Optimising antimicrobial drug use in surgery: an intervention study in a Dutch university hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996;38:1001-12.
17. Martone WJ, Nichols RL. Recognition, prevention, surveillance, and management of surgical site infections: introduction to the problem and symposium overview. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(S2):67-8.
18. Versporten A, Bolokhovets G, Ghazaryan L, Abilova V, Pyshnik G, Spasojevic T ve ark. Antibiotic use in eastern Europe: a cross-national database study in coordination with the WHO Regional Office for Europe. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:381-7.
19. Al-Azzam SI, Alzoubi KH, Mhaidat NM, Haddadin RD, Masadeh NM, Tumah HN ve ark. Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis practice and guideline adherence in Jordan: a multi-centre study in Jordanian hospitals. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2012;6:715-20.
20. Sekimoto M, Imanaka Y, Evans E, Ishizaki T, Hirose M, Hayashida K ve ark. Practice variation in perioperative antibiotic use in Japan. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;16:367-73.
21. Gould IM. Introduction: Antibioticprophylaxis in clean surgery. J Chemother. 2001;13:80-3.
22. Sanabria A, Dominguez LC, Valdivieso E, Gomez G. Prophylactic antibiotic for mesh inguinal hernioplasty: a metaanalysis. Ann Surg. 2007;245:392-6.
23. Martin C. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery: general concepts and clinical guidelines. French Study Group on Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery, French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1994;15:463-71.
24. Kaiser AB. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:1129-38.
25. Colizza S, Rossi S, Daffina A. Questionnaire survey of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in Italian surgical departments. J Chemother. 2002;14:59-64.
26. Bull AL, Russo PL, Friedman ND, Bennett NJ, Boardman CJ, Richards MJ. Compliance with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis-reporting from a statewide surveillance programme in Victoria, Australia. J Hosp Infect. 2006;63:140-7.
27. Zelenitsky SA, Ariano RE, Harding GK, Silverman RE. Antibiotic pharmacodynamics in surgical prophylaxis: an association between intraoperative antibiotic concentrations and efficacy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:3026-30.
28. Burke JP. Infection control--a problem for patient safety. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:651-6.
29. van Kasteren ME, Mannien J, Kullberg BJ, de Boer AS, Nagelkerke NJ, Ridderhof M ve ark. Quality improvement of surgical prophylaxis in Dutch hospitals: evaluation of a multi-site intervention by time series analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56:1094-102.
30. Pittet D, Ducel G. Infectious risk factors related to operating rooms. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1994;15:456-62.