Endüstriyel faktörler, benzersiz kaynaklar ve performans ilişkisi: İmalat ve hizmet sektörü işletmeleri üzerine bir araştırma

Bu araştırmada işletmeler arası performans farklılıklarının açıklanmasında işletmeye ait benzersiz kaynak ve yetenekler ile içerisinde faaliyette bulunulan sektöre ait endüstri faktörlerinin karlılık ve pazar performansı üzerinde sağladığı nispi katkı incelenmiştir. 115’i imalat, 71’i ise hizmet sektöründe faaliyet gösteren 186 firma üzerinde işletme temelli kaynaklar ile endüstri faktörlerinin performans üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeyi amaçlayan bir ölçek kullanılarak gerçekleştirilen araştırma sonunda, işletme temelli kaynakların gerek karlılık gerekse pazar performansının açıklanmasında endüstriyel faktörlere oranla belirgin derecede daha fazla katkı sağladığı bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, işletme temelli benzersiz kaynak ve yetenekler ile endüstriyel faktörlerin performansa etkilerinin imalat ve hizmet sektörlerinde faaliyet gösteren işletmelerde ayrı ayrı incelenmesi sonrasında, benzersiz kaynak ve yeteneklerin hizmet sektöründe faaliyet gösteren işletmelerin karlılık ve pazar payı performansının açıklanmasında imalat sektöründe faaliyet gösteren işletmelere oranla daha fazla açıklayıcılığa sahip olduğu görülmüştür.

The relationship between performance and industrial factors and firm level unique resources: A study on manufacturing and services firms

The aim of this study was to investigate the relative effects of structural characteristics of industries and unique firm-level factors on profitability and market performance differences among Turkish firms. A total of 186 firms, 115 from manufacturing and 71 from services industries were analyzed through a questionnaire aiming to measure the relative impact of industry and firm effects on firm performance and the findings revealed that firm- level resources had a greater effect in explaining performance variation than industry structure in the Turkish business context. Moreover, having analyzed the relative impact of industry and firm effects on overall performance based on sales turnover, market share and profitability measures in manufacturing and services firms separately, unique firm-level resources were found to be much more important in explaining performance variation in service firms than in manufacturing firms.

___

  • ACQUAAH, M. (2012), “Social networking relationships, firm-specific managerial experience and firm performance in a transition economy: A comparative analysis of family owned and nonfamily firms”, Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1215-1228.
  • AMBROSINI, V. ve BOWMAN, C. (2009), “What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management?”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, 29-49.
  • AMIT, R. ve SCHOEMAKER, P. (1993), “Strategic assets and organizational rents”, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33-47.
  • ANG, S.H. ve WIGHT, A.M. (2009), “Building intangible resources: The stickiness of reputation”, Corporate Reputation Review, 12, 21-32.
  • BAIN, J.S. (1956), Barriers to new competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • BAIN, J.S. (1959), Industrial organization, Wiley, New York, NY.
  • BARNEY, J.B. (1986), “Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage?”, Academy of Management Review, 11, 656-665.
  • BARNEY, J.B. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
  • BASOLE, R.C. ve ROUSE, W.B. (2008), “Complexity of service value networks: Conceptualization and empirical investigation”, IBM Systems Journal, 47, 53-70.
  • BHARADWAJ, S.G., VARADARAJAN, P.R. ve FAHY, J. (1993), “Sustainable competitive advantage in service industries: A conceptual model and research propositions”, Journal of Marketing, 57, 83-99.
  • BLOOM, N., KRETSCHMER, T., ve van REENEN, J. (2011), “Are family-friendly workplace practices a valuable firm resource?”, Strategic Management Journal, 32, 343-367.
  • CALOGHIROU, Y., PROTOGEROU, A., SPANOS, Y. ve PAPAGIANNAKIS, L. (2004), “Industry-versus firm-specific effects on performance: Contrasting SMEs and large-sized firms”, European Management Journal, 22, 231-243.
  • CANALS, J. (2000), Managing corporate growth, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
  • CARMELI, A. (2001), “High and low-performance firms: Do they have different profits of perceived core intangible resources and business environment?”, Technovation, 21, 661-671.
  • CHARI, M.D.R. ve DAVID, P. (2012), “Sustaining superior performance in an emerging economy: An empirical test in the Indian context”, Strategic Management Journal, 33, 217-229.
  • CHEAH, C.Y.J., KANG, J. ve CHEW, D.A.S. (2007), “Strategic analysis of large local construction firms in China”, Construction Management and Economics, 25, 25-50.
  • CHEN, Y. ve LIN, F.J. (2006), “Sources of superior performance: Industry versus firm effects among firms in Taiwan”, European Planning Studies, 14, 733-751.
  • CHISHOLM, M.A. ve NIELSEN, K. (2009), “Social capital and the resource based view of the firm”, International Studies of Management and Organizational Studies, 39, 7-32.
  • CLAVER, E., MOLINA, J. ve TARI, J. (2002), “Firm and industry effects on firm profitability: A Spanish empirical analysis”, European Management Journal, 20, 321-328.
  • CROOK, T.R., KETCHEN, D.J., COMBS, J.G. ve TODD, S.Y. (2008), “Strategic resources and performance: A meta-analysis”, Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1141-1154.
  • DENRELL, J., FANG, C. ve ZHA, Z. (2013), “Inferring superior capabilities from sustained superior performance: A Bayesian analysis”, Strategic Management Journal, 34, 182-196.
  • DiMAGGIO, P.J. ve POWELL, W.W. (1983), “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, American Sociological Review 48, 147-160.
  • FAHY, J. (2002), “A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment”, International Business Review, 11, 57-78.
  • FOSS, N.J. ve KNUDSED, T. (2003), “The resource-based tangle: Towards a sustainable explanation of competitive advantage”, Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 291-307.
  • GALBREATH, J. ve GALVIN, P. (2006), “Accounting for performance variation: How important are intangible resources?”, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 14, 150-170.
  • GALBREATH, J. ve GALVIN, P. (2008), “Firm factors, industry structure and performance variation: New empirical evidence to a classic debate”, Journal of Business Research, 61, 109-117.
  • HALL, R. (1992), “The strategic analysis of intangible resources”, Strategic Management Journal, 13, 135- 144.
  • HALL, R. (1993), “A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage”, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 607-618.
  • HANSEN, G.S. ve WERNERFELT, B. (1989), “Determinants of firm performance: The relative importance of economic and organizational factors”, Strategic Management Journal, 10, 399-411.
  • HARVEY, M., NOVICEVIC, M.M. ve KIESSLING, T. (2001), “Hypercompetition and the future of global management in the twenty-first century”, Thunderbird International Business Review, 43, 599-616.
  • HATCH, N.W. ve DYER, J.H. (2004), “Human capital and learning as a source of sustained competitive advantage”, Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1155-1178.
  • HAWAWINI, G., SUBRAMANIAN, V. ve VERDIN, P. (2003), “Is performance driven by industry or firm-specific factors? A new look at the evidence”, Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1-16.
  • HILLMAN, A.J., WITHERS, M.C. ve Collins, B.J. (2009), "Resource dependence theory: A review", Journal of Management, 35, 1404-1427.
  • HITT, M.A., BIERMAN, L., SHIMIZU, K. ve KOCHHAR, R. (2001), “Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective”, Academy of Management Journal, 44, 13-28.
  • HOSKISSON, R.E., EDEN, L., LAU, C.M. ve WRIGHT, M. (2000), “Strategies in emerging economies”, Academy of Management Journal, 43, 249-267.
  • HOSKISSON, R.E., HITT, M.A., WAN, W.P. ve YIU, D. (1999), “Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum”, Journal of Management, 25, 417-456.
  • HUFBAUER, G. ve WARREN, T. (1999), The globalization of services: What has happened? What are the implications?, Working paper, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington DC.
  • KAMAL, S. (2011), “Entry mode and subsidiary performance in emerging economies”, Mustang Journal of Business and Ethics, 2, 20-29.
  • KAMASAK, R. (2011), “Firm-specific versus industry structure factors in explaining performance variation: Empirical evidence from Turkey”, Management Research Review, 34, 1125-1146.
  • KHANDEKAR, A. ve SHARMA, A. (2005), “Managing human resource capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical analysis from Indian global organisations”, Education and Training, 47, 628-640.
  • KHANNA, T. ve RIVKIN, J. (2001), “Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets”, Strategic Management Journal, 22, 45-74.
  • KOR, Y.Y. ve MESKO, A. (2013), “Dynamic managerial capabilities: Configuration and orchestration of top executives’ capabilities and the firm’s dominant logic”, Strategic Management Journal, 34, 233-244.
  • LEI, L., ZHIANG, L. ve BINDU, A. (2008), “The turtle–hare race story revisited: Social capital and resource accumulation for firms from emerging economies”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25, 251-275.
  • LEI-YU, W. (2010), “Applicability of the resource-based and dynamic capability views under environmental volatility”, Journal of Business Research, 63, 27-31.
  • LOCKETT, A. ve THOMPSON, S. (2001), “The resource-based view and economics”, Journal of Management, 27, 723-754.
  • LOCKETT, A., THOMPSON, S. ve MORGENSTERN, U. (2009), “The development of the resource-based view of the firm: A critical appraisal”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, 9-28.
  • MAKHIJA, M. (2003), “Comparing the resource-based and market-based views of the firm: Empirical evidence from Czech privatization”, Strategic Management Journal, 24, 433-451.
  • MASON, E.S. (1939), “Price and production policies of large-scale enterprises”, American Economic Review, 29, 61-74.
  • MAURI, A.J. ve MICHAELS, M.P. (1998), “Firm and industry effects within strategic management: An empirical examination”, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 211-219.
  • McGAHAN, A.M. (1999), “Competition, strategy, and business performance”, California Management Review, 41, 74-101.
  • McGAHAN, A.M. ve PORTER, M. (1997), “How much does industry matter, really?”, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 5-14.
  • McNAMARA, G., AIME, F. ve VAALER, P.M. (2005), “Is performance driven by industry or firm-specific factors? A response to Hawawini, Subramanian, and Verdin”, Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1075-1081.
  • MEHRA, A. (1996), “Resource and market based determinants of performance in the U.S. banking industry”, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 307-322.
  • MEYER, J.W. ve ROWAN, B. (1977), “Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony”, American Journal of Sociology 83, 340-363.
  • MICHALISIN, M.D., SMITH, R.D. ve KLINE, D.M. (1997), “In search of strategic assets”, The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 5, 360-387.
  • MILLER, D. ve SHAMSIE, J. (1996), “The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965”, Academy of Management Journal, 39, 519-543.
  • MOONEY, A. (2007), “Core competence, distinctive competence, and competitive advantage: What is the difference?”, Journal of Education for Business, 83, 110-115.
  • MOSAKOWSKI, E. ve McKELVEY, B. (1997), “Predicting rent generation in competence-based competition”, içinde A. Heene ve R. Sanchez (Eds.), Competence-based strategic management (s. 65-85), John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
  • NATH, P., NACHIAPPAN, S. ve RAMANATHAN, R. (2010), “The impact of marketing capability, operations capability and diversification strategy on performance: A resource-based view”, Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 317-329.
  • NUNNALLY, J.C. (1978), Psychometric theory (2nd ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
  • O’MAHONY, M. ve VECCHI, M. (2009), “R&D, knowledge spillovers and company productivity performance”, Research Policy, 38, 35-44.
  • PENROSE, E.T. (1959), The theory of the growth of the firm, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
  • PFEFFER, J. ve SALANCIK, G.R. (1978), The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective, Harper and Row, New York, NY.
  • PHILLIPS, A. (1974), “Commentary”, içinde H.J. Goldschmid, H.M. Mann, ve J.F. Weston (Eds.), Industrial concentration: The new learning (s. 383- 392), Little, Brown, Boston, MA.
  • PORTER, M.E. (1980), Competitive strategy, The Free Press, New York, NY.
  • PORTER, M.E. (1985), Competitive advantage, The Free Press, New York, NY.
  • POWELL, T.C. (1996), “How much does industry matter? An alternative empirical test”, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 323-334.
  • POWELL, T.C. ve DENT-MICALLEF, A. (1997), “Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business and technology resources”, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 375-405.
  • PRIEM, R.L. ve BUTLER, J.E. (2001), “Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research?”, Academy of Management Review, 26, 22-40.
  • RAMASWAMI, S., SRIVASTAVA, R.K. ve BHARGAVA, M. (2009), “Market-based capabilities and financial performance of firms: Insights into marketing’s contribution to firm value”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37, 97-116.
  • RAYMOND, M.A., KIM, J. ve SHAO, A.T. (2001), “Export strategy and performance: A comparison of exporters in a developed market and an emerging market”, Journal of Global Marketing, 15, 5-29.
  • RICARDO, D. (1817), Principles of political economy and taxation, J. Murray, London.
  • ROQUEBERT, J.A., PHILLIPS, R.L. ve WESTFALL, P.A. (1996), “Market vs. management: What “drives” profitability?”, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 653-664.
  • RUMELT, R.P. (1991), “How much does industry matter?”, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 167-185.
  • RUMELT, R.P., SCHENDEL, D. ve TEECE, D.J. (1991), “Strategic management and economics”, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 5-29.
  • SAUNDERS, M., LEWIS, P. ve THORNHILL, A. (2007), Research methods for business students (4th ed.), Pearson Education, Essex, UK.
  • SCHERER, F.M. (1980), Industrial market structure and economic performance (2nd ed.), Rand McNally, Chicago, IL.
  • SCMALENSEE, R. (1985), “Do markets differ much?”, American Economic Review, 75, 341-351.
  • SETH, A. ve THOMAS, H. (1994), “Theories of the firm: Implications for strategy research”, Journal of Management Studies, 31, 165-191.
  • SHORT, J.C., KETCHEN, D.J., PALMER, T.B. ve HULT, G.T.M. (2007), “Firm, strategic group, and industry influences on performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 28, 147-167.
  • SHORT, J.C., McKELVIE, A., KETCHEN, D.J. ve CHANDLER, G.N. (2009), “Firm and industry effects on firm performance: A generalization and extension for new ventures”, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3, 47-65.
  • SPANOS. Y.E. ve LIOUKAS, S. (2001), “An examination of the causal logic of rent generation: Contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective”, Strategic Management Journal, 22, 907-934.
  • SURROCA, J., TRIBO, J.A. ve WADDOCK, S. (2010), “Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources”, Strategic Management Journal, 31, 463-490.
  • TERZIOVSKI, M. (2010), “Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: A resource-based view”, Strategic Management Journal, 31, 892-902.
  • WAN, W.P., HOSKISSON, R.E., SHORT, J.C. ve YIU, D.W. (2011), “Resource-based theory and corporate diversification: Accomplishments and opportunities”, Journal of Management, 37, 1335-1368.
  • WANG, H.C. ve AHMED, P. (2007), “Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 31-51.
  • WANG, H.C., HE, J. ve MAHONEY, J.T. (2009), “Firm-specific knowledge resources and competitive advantage: The roles of economic and relationship based employee governance mechanisms”, Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1265-1285.
  • WEIGELT, C. (2013), “Leveraging supplier capabilities: The role of locus of capability deployment”, Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1-21.
  • WELBOURNE, T.M. ve WRIGHT, P.M. (1997), Which resources matter in initial public offering firms? A longitudinal comparison of five resources’ contributions to firm performance. (Working Paper 97-02): Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  • WERNERFELT, B. (1984), “A resource-based view of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
  • WILLIAMSON, O.E. (1981), "The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach", The American Journal of Sociology, 87, 548- 577.
  • WÖLFL, A. (2005), The service economy in OECD countries, STI Working paper, OECD, Paris.
  • WU, L.Y. (2010), “Applicability of the resource-based and dynamic- capability views under environmental volatility”, Journal of Business Research, 63, 27-31.
  • YANG, C.C., MARLOW, P.B. ve LU, C.S. (2009), “Assessing resources, logistics, service capabilities, innovation capabilities and the performance of container shipping services in Taiwan”, International Journal of Production Economics, 122, 4-20.
  • YIN, R.K. (2003), Case study research: Design and methods, London, Sage Publications, UK.
  • ZINBARG, R., YOVEL, I., REVELLE, W. ve McDONALD, R. (2006), “Estimating generalizability to a universe of indicators that all have an attribute in common: A comparison of estimators for omega”, Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 121-144.