___

• ANTONUCCI, D. ve S. MANZOCCHI. (2005). Does Turkey Have a Special Trade Relations with the EU? A Gravity Model Approach, SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=609881 or DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.609881, Erişim: 04.12.2014.
• BALTAGİ, Badi.H. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
• BRÜLHART, Marius, Mary J. Kelly. (1999), Ireland’s Trading Potential with Central and Eastern European Countries: A Gravity Study, The Economic and Social Review, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 159-174.
• BOS, J.W.B., M. van de Laar (2004), Explaining Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe: an Extended Gravity Approach, DNB Working Papers, 008, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
• CHRISTIE, E. (2002), Potential Trade in Southeast Europe: A Gravity Model Approach, http://www.wiiw.ac.at/balkan/files/Christie.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 01.01.2015.
• GENÇ, M., A. ARTAN ve M. BERBER. (2007), Karadeniz Ekonomik İşbirliği Bölgesinde Ticaret Akımlarının Belirleyicileri: Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı, II. Uluslararası İşletme ve Ekonomi Çalıştayı, 28-29 Haziran 2007, Giresun.
• KALBASI, H. (2001) The Gravity Model and Global Trade Flows, Conference of EcoMod, Washington DC.
• KARAGÖZ, Kadir, Murat Karagöz. (2009), Türkiye’nin Küresel Ticaret Potansiyeli: Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı, C.Ü. İktisadı ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt:10, Sayı:2, s:127-144.
• ÖZDEŞER, Hüseyin, Dizem Ertaç. (2010), Turkey’s Trade Potential with Euro Zone Countries: A Gravity Study, European Journal of Scientific Researcher, Vol:43, No:1, p:15-23.
• POROJAN, A. (2001), Trade Flows and Spatial Effects: The Gravity Model Revisited, Open Economies Review, Vol. 12, 265-280.
• PÖYHMNEN, P. (1963), A Tentative Model for Volume in Trade Between Countries, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 90, 91-113.
• RAHMAN, M. (2003), A Panel Data of Bangladesh’s Trade: The Gravity Model Approach, European Trade Study Group (ETSG) 2003 Programme, Madrid.
• RAHMAN, M., W. B. SHADAT, ve N.C. DAS (2006) Trade Potential in SAFTA: An Application of Augmented Gravity Model, Centre for Policy Dialogue, Occasional Paper Series, No. 61.
• RAHMAN, Mohammad Mafizur. (2009), Australia’s Global Trade Potential: Evidence from the Gravity Model Analysis, Oxford Business & Economics Conference Program.
• RAM, Y. ve B.C. PRASAD (2007), Assessing Fiji’s Global Trade Potential Using the Gravity Model Approach, USPSE Working Paper, No. 2007-05.
• SANDALCILAR, A. (2012), Türkiye’nin BRIC Ülkeleriyle Ticari Potansiyeli: Panel Çekim Modeli Yaklaşımı, Journal of Yasar University, Cilt: 25(7), s: 4164-4175.
• SIMWAKA, K. (2006), Dynamics of Malawi’s Trade Flows: a Gravity Model Approach, MPRA Working Paper, No. 1122.
• ŞENGÖNÜL, A. ve İ. TUNCER (2004) Dış Ticaret Politikaları ve Uzun Dönem Büyüme, Gazi Ün., İİBF, Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, C. 15, S. 52-53, 161- 184.
• TINBERGEN J. (1962). Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy, USA: The Twentieth Century Fund.
• TOVIAS, A., S. KALAYCIOĞLU, I. DAFNI, E. RUBEN ve L. HERMAN. (2005), Economic Cooperation Potential Between the Mashrek Countries, Turkey and Israel, MEEA ECOMOD Conference, Free University of Brussels, June 2-4.
• UTKULU, U. ve H. KAHYAOĞLU. (2005), Ticarî ve Finansal Açıklık Türkiye’de Büyümeyi Ne Yönde Etkiledi?, TEK, Tartışma Metni, No. 2005-13.
• WİLLİAM H. Greene. (2008), Econometric Analysis, New York Üniversity, Pearson Prentice Hall.
• WOOLDRİGE, Jeffrey Marc. (2003), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, The MIT Press.
• YAPRAKLI, S. (2007), Ticarî ve Finansal Açıklık ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki: Türkiye Üzerine Bir Uygulama, İ. Ü. İktisat Fakültesi, Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi, 5, 67-89.
• YERDELEN TATOĞLU F. (2012a). Panel Veri Ekonometrisi Stata Uygulamalı, İstanbul, Beta Yayınları.
• YERDELEN TATOĞLU F. (2012b). İleri Panel Veri Analizi Stata Uygulamalı, İstanbul, Beta Yayınları.
• www.unctad.org
• www.trademap.org
• www.timeanddate.com
• http://data.worldbank.org