Preoperatif üç farklı yolla uygulanan lornoksikamın postoperatif analjezi üzerine etkisi

Bu çalışmada preoperatif lornoksikamın PO, İM ve İV uygulamasının postoperatif ağrıyı önlemedeki etkisini araştırdık. ASA I-II grubuna giren, 18-65 yaş arası 40 olgu randomize dört gruba ayrıldı. 8 mg lornoksikam operasyondan 1 saat önce oral, İM, veya İV (Grup PO, Grup İM, Grup İV) verildi. Kontrol grubuna (Grup K) analjezi yapılmadı. Postoperatif ilk analjezik gereksinimi zamanı, tüketilen ilaç miktarları, VAS ve VRS ağrı skorları kaydedildi. VAS ≥ 3 olduğu zaman lornoksikam infüzyonu HKA cihazı ile verildi. Grup K’da, diğer gruplara göre postoperatif ağrı başlama süresinin daha kısa; postoperatif 2. saatte VAS ve VRS skorları daha yüksek ve total lornoksikam tüketiminin ise daha fazla olduğu saptandı. Grup PO, İM ve İV arasında ağrı başlama süresi ve total lornoksikam tüketimi açısından anlamlı fark bulunmadı. Preoperatif 8 mg lornoksikam kullanmı postoperatif ağrı başlama süresini uzatmakta ve analjezik ihtiyacını azaltmaktadır. PO, IM, İV uygulamalar arasında analjezik etki açısından fark saptanmamıştır.

The effect of three different lornoxicam administration on postoperative analgesia

In this study we evaluated the postoperative analgesic efficacy of lornoxicam PO, IM and IV administration preoperatively. Fourty patients, aged between 18-65 years, ASA I-II class, were randomized to four groups. Lornoxicam 8 mg was administired PO, IM, IV (Group PO, Group IM, Group IV) 1 hour before the operation. Analgesia was not performed in control group (Group C). First analgesic requirement time, analgesic consumption and the VAS and VRS pain scores were recorded postoperatively. When VAS 3 patient controlled analgesia with lornoxicam was begun. We found that first analgesic requirement time was shorter, postoperative 2nd hour VAS and VRS scores and drug consumptions were higher in Grup C cases according to the other groups. There was no significant difference in first analgesic requirement time and analgesic consumption. Preoperative administration of 8 mg lornoxicam delayed the first analgesic requirement time and decreased total analgesic requirement. There was no difference on analgesic effect between PO, IM, and IV administrations.

___

  • Aabakken L, Osnes M, Frenzel W. Gastrointestinal tolerability of lornoxicam compared to that of naproxen in healthy male volunteers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1996; 10: 151-6.
  • Adams SS. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, plasma half-lives, and adverse reactions. Lancet 1987; 21: 1204-5.
  • Ankier SI, Brimelow AE, Crome P, Johnston A, Warrington SJ, Turner P, Ferber HP. Chlortenoxicam pharmacokinetics in young and elderly human volunteers. Postgrad Med J 1988; 64: 752-4.
  • Balfour JA, Fitton A, Barradell LB. Lornoxicam. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in the management of painful and inflammatory conditions. Drugs 1996; 51: 639-57.
  • Bernstein RM, Calin HJ, Calin A, Ollier S: A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of lornoxicam and in domethacin in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur J Rheum Inflamm 1992; 12: 6-13.
  • Berry H, Bird HA, Black C, Blake DR, Freeman AM, Golding DN, Hamilton EB, Jayson MI, Kidd B, Kohn H, et al. A double blind, multicentre, placebo controlled trial of lornoxicam in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Ann Rheum Dis 1992; 51: 238-42.
  • Bianchi M, Panerai AE. Effects of lornoxicam, piroxicam, and meloxicam in a model of thermal hindpaw hyperalgesia induced by formalin injection in rat tail. Pharmacol Res 2002; 45: 101-105.
  • Bigat Z, Karsli B, Boztu¤ N and Tasatargil A. The analgesic effect of intrathecal lornoxicam. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2004; 29(Suppl 2): 53.
  • Brennan TJ, Vandermeulen EP, Gebhart GF. Characterization of a rat model of incisional pain. Pain 1996; 64: 493-501.
  • Brennan TJ, Umali EF, Zahn PK. Comparison of pre-versus post-incision administration of intrathecal bupivacaine and intrathecal morphine in a rat model of postopera tive pain. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 1517-28.
  • Brennan TJ, Kehlet H. Preventive analgesia to reduce wound hyperalgesia and persistent postsurgical pain: not aneasy path. Anesthesiology. 2005; 103: 681-3.
  • Dahl JB, Moiniche S. Pre-emptive analgesia. Br Med Bull 2004; 13; 71:13-27.
  • Erdine S. Ağrı. Genşletilmş 2. baskı. Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri 2002; 20-29.
  • Hein A, Norlander C, Blom L, Jakobsson J. Is pain prophylaxis in minor gynaecological surgery of clinical value? a double-blind placebo controlled study of paracetamol 1 g versus lornoxicam 8 mg given orally. Ambul Surg 2001; 9: 91-4
  • Katz J, McCartney CJ. Current status of pre-emptive analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2002; 15: 435-41.
  • Kissin I. Preemptive analgesia: terminology and clinical relevance. Anesth Analg 1994; 79: 809-10.
  • Kissin I. Preemptive analgesia at the crossroad. Anesth Analg. 2005; 100: 754-6.
  • Koltka K, Talu GK, Cengiz M, Yıldırım fi, Özyalçın S. Comparison of the efficacy of intraarticular administration of lornoxicam, bupivacaine and placebo on postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic knee surgery. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2004; 29 (Suppl 2): 89.
  • Korfalı G. Anestezide Temel Konular. Ağrı Fizyolojisi ve Tedavi ilkeleri. Nobel Tıp Kitabevi 2003; 293-306.
  • Lehmann KA, Henn C. Status of postoperative pain therapy in West Germany. Results of a representative survey. Anaesthesist. 1987; 36: 400-6.
  • Moiniche S, Kehlet H, Dahl JB. A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief: the role of timing of analgesia. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 725-41.
  • Nuutinen LS, Laitinen JO, Salomaki TE. A risk-benefit appraisal of injectable NSAIDs in the management of postoperative pain. Drug Saf 1993: 9(5): 380-93.
  • Oden R: Acute postoperative pain: incidence, severity and the etiology of inadequte treatment. Anaesthes 1990; 37: 719-721.
  • Petrova VV, Osipova NA, Beresnev VA, Dolgopolova TV, Biriukov VI, Torchinskaia EV, Ivanova LM. Lornoxicam (xefocam) as an agent for the prevention and treatment of postoperative pain among other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Anesteziol Reanimatol. 2005;(5): 39-43.
  • Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Zahn PK: From preemptive to preventive analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2006, 19: 551-5.
  • Pruss TP, Stroissnig H, Radhofer-Welte S, Wendtlandt W, Mehdi N, Takacs F, Fellier H. Overview of the pharmacological properties, pharmacokinetics and animal safety assessment of lornoxicam. Postgrad Med J 1990; 66 Suppl 4: S18-21.
  • Rosenow DE, Krieken FV, Stolke D, Kursten FW. Intravenous administration of lornoxicam, a new NSAID, and pethidine for postoperative pain. Clin Drug Invest 1996; 11: 11-9.
  • Rosenow DE, Albrechtsen M, Stolke D. A comparison of patient-controlled analgesia with lornoxicam versus morphine in patients undergoing lumbar disk surgery. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 1045-50.
  • Sinatra RS, Lodge K, Sibert K, Chung KS, Chung JH, Parker A Jr, Harrison DM. A comparison of morphine, meperidine, and oxymorphone as utilized in patient-controlled analgesia following cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology 1989; 70: 585-90.
  • Trampitsch E, Pipam W, Moertl M, Sadjak A, Dorn C, Sittl R, Likar R. Preemptive randomized, double-blind study with lornoxicam in gynecological surgery. Schmerz. 2003; 17: 4-10.
  • Warrington SJ, Lewis Y, Dawnay A, Johnston A, Kovacs IB, Lamb E, Ravic M. Renal and gastrointestinal tolerability of lornoxicam, and effects on haemostasis and hepatic microsomal oxidation. Postgrad Med J. 1990; 66 Suppl 4: S35-40.