Hatice ŞİMŞEK ÜLKÜ, YASEMİN GÜNEŞ, Murat ILGINEL, EBRU BİRİCİK, FERİDE KARACAER

Pediyatrik olgularda roküronyum enjeksiyon ağrısının azaltılmasında roküronyum uygulama hızı ve remifentanilin etkisi

Amaç: Bu çalışmada genel anestezi alması planlanan pediatrik olgularda yavaş ve hızlı rokuronyum enjeksiyonu öncesi uygulanan remifentanilin, hemodinamik değişiklikler ve rokuronyum enjeksiyon ağrısı üzerine olan etkisini belirlemeyi hedefledik.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamıza 5-15 yaş arasında, ASA I-II grubu 120 pediatrik hasta alındı. Birinci gruba (Grup A) rokuronyum yavaş enjeksiyonundan önce 4ml salin, ikinci gruba (Grup B) rokuronyum yavaş enjeksiyonundan önce 0,5µg kg-1 remifentanil, üçüncü gruba (Grup C) rokuronyum hızlı enjeksiyonundan önce 4ml salin, dördüncü gruba (Grup D) rokuronyum hızlı enjeksiyonundan önce 0,5µg kg-1 remifentanil verildi. Rokuronyum enjeksiyonu sırasında hastaların çekme yanıtları 0-3 puanlı çekme yanıt skoruna göre kaydedildi. Hemodinamik parametreler kaydedildi.Bulgular: Remifentanil yapılan gruplarda rokuronyum enjeksiyonu sonrası 1. dk' da plasebo yapılan gruplara göre kalp atım hızı ölçümleri daha düşük bulundu. Hastaların çekme yanıt skorları incelendiğinde yanıtsızlık oranının en yüksek olduğu gruplar B (%66.7) ve D grupları ( %70) idi. Yanıt olmayan hasta sayısı salin uygulanan A ve C gruplarında 9 iken, remifentanil uygulanan B grubunda 20, D grubunda 21 idi. Jeneralize yanıt ise en çok ( %20) A ve C gruplarında görüldü.Sonuç: Pediyatrik olgularda rokuronyuma bağlı gelişen enjeksiyon ağrısında enjeksiyon hızının etkisinin olmadığı, rokuronyum öncesi yapılan remifentanilin ciddi hemodinamik değişikliklere yol açmaksızın enjeksiyon ağrısını enjeksiyon hızı ile ilişkisiz olarak önemli oranda azalttığı kanısına varıldı

Effect of rocuronium administration rate and remifentanil on prevention of rocuronium injection pain in pediatric cases

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of remifentanil administration prior to slow and fast rocuronium infusion on hemodynamic changes and rocuronium injection pain in pediatric patients.Methods: In total, 120 5–15-year-old ASA score I/II pediatric patients were included in the study. Group A: slow rocuronium injection-saline; group B: slow rocuronium injection (0.6 mg/kg IV)-remifentanyl; group C: fast rocuronium injection-saline; and group D: fast rocuronium injection-remifentanyl. Withdrawal movement after rocuronium injection was recorded based on a 3-point response to withdrawal score. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded.Results: One minute after rocuronium injection, HR values were found to be lower in remifentanil groups (p: 0.0001; 101.4±22.1, p: 0.003; 99.8±18.3 in group B and D, respectively) compared with those in placebo groups (p: 0.025; 107.4±21.7, p: 0.012; 114.0±16.4 in group A and C, respectively). With respect to the response to withdrawal scores, unresponsiveness rates were the highest in group B (66.7%) and group D (70%). The number of non-responder patients was 9 in saline-administered groups (group A and C), whereas it was 20 and 21 in remifentanil-administered groups (group B and D, respectively). Generalized responses were observed predominantly in groups A (20%) and C (20%). Generalized responses were highest in groups A (20%, n=6) and C (20%, n=6).Conclusion: There was no impact of infusion speed on rocuronium injection pain in pediatric cases, whereas it is concluded that remifentanil administration prior to rocuronium injection considerably reduced rocuronium injection pain regardless of injection speed and without serious hemodynamic changes

PDF

___

1. Steegers MA, Robertson EN. Pain on injection of rocuronium bromide. Anesth Analg 1996;83(1):203.
2. Yavascaoglu B, Kaya FN, Ozcan B. Esmolol pretreatment reduces the frequency and severity of pain on injection of rocuronium. J Clin Anesth 2007;19(6):413–7.
3. Lui JT, Huang SJ, Yang CY, Hsu JC, Lui PW. Rocuronium-induced generalized spontaneous movements cause pulmonary aspiration. Chang Gung Med J 2002;25(9):617–20.
4. Yoon JY, Kim HK, Kwon JY, Shin SW, Kim KH, Kim WS, et al. EC(50) of remifentanil to prevent withdrawal movement associated with injection of rocuronium. J Anesth 2010;24(2):182–6.
6. Lockey D, Coleman P. Pain during injection of rocuronium bromide. Anaesthesia 1995;50(5):474.
7. Borgeat A, Kwiatkowski D, Ruetsch YA. Spontaneous movements associated with rocuronium injection: the effects of prior administration of fentanyl. J Clin Anesth 1997;9(8):650–2.
8. Blunk JA, Seifert F, Schmelz M, Reeh PW, Koppert W. Injection pain of rocuronium and vecuronium is evoked by direct activation of nociceptive nerve endings. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003;20(3):245–53.
9. Na YC, Lee HG, Lee SH, Jang EA, Yoon MH. The efficacy of sevolflurane inhalation alone or its combination with intravenous remifentanil against withdrawal movements on rocuronium injection in children. Korean J Anesthesiol 2014;67(6):373–7.
10. Kim JY, Kim JY, Kim YB, Kwak HJ. Pretreatment with remifentanil to prevent withdrawal after rocuronium in children. Br J Anaesth 2007;98(1):120–3.
11. Ahmad N, Choy CY, Aris EA, Balan S. Preventing the withdrawal response associated with rocuronium injection: a comparison of fentanyl with lidocaine. Anesth Analg 2005;100(4):987–90.
12. Glass PS, Hardman D, Kamiyama Y, Quill TJ, Marton G, Donn KH, et al. Preliminary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an ultra-short-acting opioid: remifentanil (GI87084B). Anesth Analg 1993;77(5):1031–40.
13. Lesniak A, Lipkowski AW. Opioid peptides in peripheral pain control. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 2011;71(1):129–38.
14. Yoon JR, Jeon Y, Yoo Y, Shin HJ, Ahn JH, Lim CH. The analgesic effect of remifentanil on prevention of withdrawal response associated with the injection of rocuronium in children: no evidence for a peripheral action. J Int Med Res 2010;38(5):1795–800.
15. Gezer A, Arslan G, Berkel G, Sezen Ö, Gürsu T, Arıkan Z. Comparison of remifentanil, alfentanil, fentanyl in atteunuation of the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Kartal Eğitim Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi 2002;1:16–9.
16. Chiarella AB, Jolly DT, Huston CM, Clanachan AS. Comparison of four strategies to reduce the pain associated with intravenous administration of rocuronium. Br J Anaesth 2003;90(3):377–9.
17. Klement W, Arndt JO. Pain on i.v. injection of some anaesthetic agents is evoked by the unphysiological osmolality or pH of their formulations. Br J Anaesth 1991;66(2):189–95.
18. Kindgen-Milles D, Klement W, Arndt JO. The nociceptive systems of skin, paravascular tissue and hand veins of humans and their sensitivity to bradykinin. Neurosci Lett 1994;181(1- 2):39–42.
19. Blunk JA, Seifert F, Schmelz M, Reeh PW, Koppert W. Injection pain of rocuronium and vecuronium is evoked by direct activation of nociceptive nerve endings. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003;20(3):245–53.
20. Lee YC, Jang YH, Kim JM, Lee SG. Rapid injection of rocuronium reduces withdrawal movement on injection. J Clin Anesth 2009;21(6):427–30.
21. Baek SH, Woo CM, Lee HJ, Yoon JY, Kwon JY, Shin SW. Rocuronium-induced withdrawal movements associated with different Rocuronium injection method. Paediatr Anaesth 2008;18(6):515–9.
22. Shin YH, Kim CS, Lee JH, Sim WS, Ko JS, Cho HS, et al. Dilution and slow injection reduces the incidence of rocuronium-induced withdrawal movements in children. Korean J Anesthesiol 2011;61(6):465–9.
23. Shevchenko Y, Jocson JC, McRae VA, Stayer SA, Schwartz RE, Rehman M, et al. The use of lidocaine for preventing the withdrawal associated with the injection of rocuronium in children and adolescents. Anesth Analg 1999;88(4):746–8.
24. Memiş D, Turan A, Karamanlioğlu B, Süt N, Pamukçu Z. The prevention of pain from injection of rocuronium by ondansetron, lidocaine, tramadol, and fentanyl. Anesth Analg 2002;94(6):1517–20.
25. Cheong KF, Wong WH. Pain on injection of rocuronium: influence of two doses of lidocaine pretreatment. Br J Anaesth 2000;84(1):106–7.
26. Liou JT, Hsu JC, Liu FC, Ching-Wah Sum D, Lui PW. Pretreatment with small-dose ketamine reduces withdrawal movements associated with injection of rocuronium in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 2003;97(5):1294–7.