Ketamin ve ropivakainin pediatrik hastalarda etkinliği: Plasebo kontrollü, çift kör çalışma

Ketamin ve Ropivakainin pediatrik hastalarda etkinliği Randomize, plasebo kontrollü ve çift kör olarak düzenlenen bu çalışmada, ropivakainle kaudal blok altında elektif herni tamiri yapılacak pediatrik hastalarda preemptif intravenöz ketamin ve plasebonun etkilerinin karşılaştırılması ve değerlendirilmesi yapılmıştır. MATERYAL-METOD: planlı herni tamiri operasyonu geçirecek olan 1- 12 yaşları arasında, ASA I-II grubu 60 hasta çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Hastalar randomize olarak 3 gruba ayrılmıştır. Grup K hastalara anestezi indüksiyonundan önce intravenöz yolla 0.5 mg/kg ketamin, Grup R hastalara kaudalden 0.7 mg/kg %0.2 ropivakain ve intravenöz yoldan 2 ml normal salin, Grup RK hastalara kaudalden 0.7 mg/ml %0.2 ropivakain ve intravenöz 0.5 mg/kg ketamin verilmiştir. Anestezi süresince hastaların kalp hızı, end-tidal CO2, pulse oksimetri, kan basınçları ve BIS(bispektral indeks) takibi yapılmıştır. Postopertif analjezi etkinliği Objektif Ağrı Skalası (OPS) ile değerlendirilmiş ve analjezik ihtiyacı operasyon sırasında ve sonrasında kayıt edilmiştir. BULGULAR: Grup R ve Grup RK arasında fentanil tüketiminde faklılık görülmedi, anestezi sırasında Grup K hastalardaki fentanil tüketimi önemli derecede yüksekti, Grup R ve Grup RK, Grup K ile karşılaştırıldığında OPS değeri önemli derecede yüksek olarak görüldü. SONUÇ: Elektif herni tamiri yapılan pediatrik hasta grubunda kaudal uygulamalarda uygun dozlarda ropivakain ile peroperatif ve postoperatif dönemlerde tatmin edici analjezi sağlanabilmiş ve yan etki görülmemiştir. Uygulanan ketamin dozlarında ise preemptif etki elde edilememiştir.

The efficacy of preemptive ketamine and ropivacaine in pediatric patients: A placebo controlled, double-blind

OBJECTIVE: We have evaluated and compared the preemptive efficacy of intravenous ketamine with placebo and caudal ropivacaine in pediatric patients going under elective hernia repair. METHODS: 60 ASAI-II pediatric patients ages between 1-12. The patients were divided into 3 groups randomly. Group K patients had 0.5mg/kg ketamine by intravenous route before induction,Group R patients had 0.7 mg/kg 0.2% ropivacaine caudally and 2ml normal saline intravenously,Group RK patients had 0.7 mg/kg 0.2% ropivacaine caudally and 0.5mg/kg ketamine by intravenous routeAll patients had standard anesthesia technique. Heart rate (HR), pulse oximetry, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), and BIS (bispectral index) were obtained during anesthesia, In addition, end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration was monitored. The efficacy of postoperative analgesia was documented by objective pain scale (OPS). Analgesic requirements during and after the surgery documented RESULTS: While there was no significant differences in fentanyl consumption between the groups GR and GRK, fentanyl consumption was found to be significantly higher in group K during anesthesia.When compared with GR and GRK, GK had significantly higher OPS values. During postoperative period Group K patients demanded for additional analgesics in significantly shorter time than group R and Group K patients. GK patients had consumed significantly higher amounts of acetaminophen after surgery CONCLUSION: Caudal application of ropivacaine in appropriate doses provides satisfactory peroperative and postoperative analgesia with no side effects in pediatric patient group going under elective hernia repair where as ketamine with the applied doses has no preemptive effect.

___

  • Giorgio I, Pasquale D, Alessandra C, Roberto G, Pasquale V,Claudia V,Ferdinando G, Staffan E, Per-Arne L, Comparison of racemic bupivacaine, ropivacaine, and levo-bupivacaine for pediatric caudal anesthesia: Effects on postoperative nalgesia and motor block, Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 2002, Vol 27, No2 (March-April), pp 157-161.
  • Panjabi N, Prakash S, Gupta P, Raj Gogia A, Efficacy of three doses of ketamine with bupivacaine for caudal analgesia in pediatric inguinal herniotomy, Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 2004, Vol 29, No1 (January-February), pp 28-31.
  • Almenrader N, Passariello M, D’Amicomd G, Haiberger R,Pietropaoli P, Caudal additives for postoperative pain management in children: S(+)-ketamine and neostigmine, Pediatric Anesthesia, 2005, 15: 143-147.
  • Launo C, Bassi C, Spagnolo L, Badano S, Ricci C, Lizzi A,Molinino M. Preemptive ketamine during general anesthesia for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Minerva Anestesiol,2004 Oct;70(10):727-34; 734-8.
  • De Beer DAH and Thomas ML, Caudal additives in children solutions or problems, Br J Anesth, 2003, 90: 487-98.
  • Koinig H, Krenn CG, Glaser C, et al. The dose-response of caudal ropivacaine in children, Anesthesiology, 1999, 90: 1339-44.
  • Turan A, Memis D, Basaran ÜN, Karamanlıoğlu B, Süt N, Caudal ropivacaine and neostigmine in pediatric surgery, Anesthesiology, 2003, 98: 719–22.
  • Prosser DP, Davis A, Booker PD, Murray A, Caudal tramadol for postoperative analgesia in paediatric hypospadias surgery, Br J Anaesth, 1997, 79: 293–6.
  • Cook B, Grubb DJ, Aldridge LA, Doyle E, Comparison of the effects of adrenaline, clonidine and ketamine on the duration of caudal analgesia produced by bupivacaine in children, Br J Anaesth, 1995, 75: 698–701.
  • Naguib M, Sharif AMY, Seraj M, El Gammal M, Dawlatly AA,Ketamine for caudal analgesia in children: Comparison with caudal bupivacaine, Br J Anaesth, 1991, 67: 559–64.
  • Ivani G, De Negri P, Conio A, Amati M, Roero S, Giannone S,Lonnqvist PA, Ropivacaine-clonidine combination for caudal blockade in children, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2000, 44: 446–449.
  • Kissin I, Preemptive Analgesia, Anesthesiology, 2000 Vol 93(4)October, pp 1138-1143.
  • Lee IH, Lee IO, Preemptive effect of intravenous ketamine in the rat: Concordance between pain behavior and spinal fos-like immunoreactivity, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2005, Feb, 49(2): 160-5.
  • Lee IO, Lee IH, Systemic, but not intrathecal, ketamine produces preemptive analgesia in the rat formalin model, Acta Anaesthesiol Sin, 2001, Sep, 39(3): 123-7.
  • Nagasaka H, Nakamura S, Mizumoto Y, Sato I, Effects of ketamine on formalin-induced activity in the spinal dorsal horn of spinal cord-transected cats: Differences in response to intravenous ketamine administered before and after formalin, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2000, Sep, 44(8): 953-8.
  • Becke K, Albrecht S, Schmitz B, Rech D, Koppert W, Schuttler J, Hering W, Intraoperative low-dose S-ketamine has no preventive effects on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after major urological surgery in children, Paediatr Anaesth, 2005, Jun, 15(6): 484-90.
  • Gilabert Morell A, Sanchez Perez C, Effect of low-dose intravenous ketamine in postoperative analgesia for hysterectomy and adnexectomy, Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 2002, May, 49(5): 247-53.
  • Adam F, Libier M, Oszustowicz T, Lefebvre D, Beal J, Meynadier J, Preoperative small-dose ketamine has no preemptive analgesic effect in patients undergoing total mastectomy, Anesth Analg, 1999, Aug, 89(2): 444-7.
  • Kwok RF, Lim J, Chan MT, Gin T, Chiu WK, Preoperative ketamine improves postoperative analgesia after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, Anesth Analg, 2004,Apr, 98(4): 1044-9.
  • Lavand'homme P, De Kock M, Waterloos H, Intraoperative Epidural Analgesia Combined with Ketamine Provides Effective Preventive Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Major Digestive Surgery, Anesthesiology, 2005, Oct,103(4): 813-820.